DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative study of prediction methods of power increase and propulsive performances in regular head short waves of KVLCC2 using CFD

  • Lee, Cheol-Min (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Seo, Jin-Hyeok (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Yu, Jin-Won (Global Core Research Center for Ships and Offshore Plants, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Jung-Eun (Global Core Research Center for Ships and Offshore Plants, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Inwon (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2018.11.06
  • Accepted : 2019.02.19
  • Published : 2019.02.18

Abstract

This paper employs computational tools to predict power increase (or speed loss) and propulsion performances in waves of KVLCC2. Two-phase unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations have been solved using finite volume method; and a realizable k-ε model has been applied for the turbulent closure. The free-surface is obtained by solving a VOF equation. Sliding mesh method is applied to simulate the flow around an operating propeller. Towing and self-propulsion computations in calm water are carried out to obtain the towing force, propeller rotating speed, thrust and torque at the self-propulsion point. Towing computations in waves are performed to obtain the added resistance. The regular short head waves of λ/LPP = 0.6 with 4 wave steepness of H/λ = 0.007, 0.017, 0.023 and 0.033 are taken into account. Four methods to predict speed-power relationship in waves are discussed; Taylor expansion, direct powering, load variation, resistance and thrust identity methods. In the load variation method, the revised ITTC-78 method based on the 'thrust identity' is utilized to predict propulsive performances in full scale. The propulsion performances in waves including propeller rotating speed, thrust, torque, thrust deduction and wake fraction, propeller advance coefficient, hull, propeller open water, relative rotative and propulsive efficiencies, and delivered power are investigated.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy

References

  1. Arribas, F.P., 2007. Some methods to obtain the added resistance of a ship advancing in waves. Ocean Eng. 34, 946-955.
  2. Baree, M.S., 2010. An investigation of ship performance in seas. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Marine Technology (MARTEC), 11-12, December 2010, BUET, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  3. Carrica, P.M., Castro, A.M., Stern, F., 2010. Self-propulsion computations using a speed controller and a discretized propeller with dynamic overset grids. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 15, 316-330.
  4. Castro, A.M., Carrica, P.M., Stern, F., 2011. Full scale self-propulsion computations using discretized propeller for the KRISO container ship KCS. Comput. Fluids 51, 35-47.
  5. CD Adapco, 2016. STAR-CCM+ User Guide, version 11.04.
  6. Choi, J.E., Kim, J.H., Lee, H.G., Choi, B.J., Lee, D.H., 2009. Computational predictions of ship-speed performance. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 14 (3), 322-333.
  7. Choi, J.E., Min, K.-S., Kim, J.H., Lee, S.B., Seo, H.W., 2010. Resistance and propulsion characteristics of various commercial ships based on CFD results. Ocean Eng. 37, 549-566.
  8. Chuang, Z., Steen, S., 2011. Prediction of speed loss of a ship in waves. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Marine Propulsors (SMP), M. Abdel-Maksoud. Hamburg, Germany, 1: 8.
  9. Chuang, Z., Steen, S., 2013. Speed loss of a vessel sailing in oblique waves. Ocean Eng. 64, 88-99.
  10. Eide, E., 2015. Calculation of Service and Sea Margins. Master thesis. Institute for Marine Technology Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
  11. Faltinsen, O.M., 1990. Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  12. Faltinsen, O.M., Minsaas, K.J., Liapis, N., Skjordal, S.O., 1980. Prediction of resistance and propulsion of a ship in a seaway. In: Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics (SNH), pp. 505-529.
  13. Gerritsma, J., Beukelman, W., 1972. Analysis of the resistance increase in waves of a fast cargo ship. Int. Shipbuild. Prog. 19, 285-293.
  14. Guo, B., Steen, S., Deng, G.B., 2012. Seakeeping prediction of KVLCC2 in head waves with RANS. Appl. Ocean Res. 35, 56-67.
  15. Journee, J.M.J., 1976a. Report 428, May 1976. Motions, Resistance and Propulsion of a Ship in Regular Head Waves, vol. 2. Delft University of Technology, Ship Hydromechanics Laboratory, Mekelweg, CD Delft, The Netherlands, p. 2628.
  16. Journee, J.M.J., 1976b. Prediction of speed and behaviour of a ship in a seaway. Int. Shipbuild. Prog. 23 (265), 1-24.
  17. Kayano, J., Yabuki, H., Sasaki, N., Hiwatashi, R., 2013. A study on the propulsion performance in the actual sea by means of full-scale experiments. The International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation 7 (4), 521-526.
  18. Kim, M., Hizirb, O., Turana, O., Incecika, A., 2017a. Numerical studies on added resistance and motions of KVLCC2 in head seas for various ship speeds. Ocean Eng. 140, 466-476.
  19. Kim, M., Hizirb, O., Turana, O., Incecika, A., 2017b. Estimation of added resistance and ship speed loss in a seaway. Ocean Eng. 141, 465-476.
  20. Kim, W.J., Van, D.H., Kim, D.H., 2001. Measurement of flows around modern commercial ship models. Exp. Fluid 31, 567-578.
  21. McCarthy, J.H., Norley, W.H., Ober, G.L., 1961. The Performance of a Submerged Propeller in Regular Waves. David Taylor Model Basin, Washington DC, USA.
  22. MEPC 66/21 Annex 5, 2014. Guidelines on the Method of Calculation of the Attained Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for New Ships.
  23. Nakamura, S., Naito, S., 1975. Propulsive performance of a container ship in waves. J. Kansai Soc. Nav. Archit. Jpn. 158, 24-47.
  24. Prpic-Orsic, J., Faltinsen, O.M., 2009. Speed loss calculation in a seaway. In: Proceedings of the 13th Congress. International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean (IMAM), p. 393-400.
  25. Prpic-Orsic, J., Faltinsen, O.M., 2012. Estimation of ship speed loss and associated CO2 emissions in a seaway. Ocean Eng. 44, 1-10.
  26. Rathje, H., Schellin, T.E., Brehm, A., 2011. Speed loss in waves and wave-induced torsion of a wide-breadth containership. Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 225, 387-401.
  27. Seo, J.H., Seol, D.M., Lee, J.H., Rhee, S.H., 2010. Flexible CFD meshing strategy for prediction of ship resistance and propulsion performance. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 2, 139-145.
  28. Taskar, B., Yum, K.K., Steen, S., Pedersen, E., 2016. The effect of waves on enginepropeller dynamics and propulsion performance of ships. Ocean Eng. 122, 262-277.
  29. Valanto, P., Hong, Y., 2017. Wave added resistance and propulsive performance of a cruise ship in waves. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE), 25-30 June, San Francisco, California, USA.
  30. Yu, J.W., Lee, C.M., Choi, J.E., Lee, I.W., 2017. Effect of ship motions on added resistance in regular head waves of KVLCC2. Ocean Eng. 146, 375-387.