DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bronze Production Technology in the Early Iron Age: A comparative study of bronze artifacts recovered from the Hoam-dong site in Chungju and Chongsong-ri in Buyeo

초기철기시대 청동기의 제작기술 - 충주 호암동유적과 부여 청송리유적 출토 청동기의 비교 연구-

  • Han, Woorim (Gaya National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage) ;
  • Hwang, Jinju (Conservation Division of NRICH) ;
  • Kim, Sojin (Planning and Coordination Division of NRICH)
  • 한우림 (국립가야문화재연구소) ;
  • 황진주 (국립문화재연구소 보존과학연구실) ;
  • 김소진 (국립문화재연구소 연구기획과)
  • Received : 2018.09.30
  • Accepted : 2018.11.12
  • Published : 2018.12.30

Abstract

Thirty-three Early Iron Age bronzes at the sites of Hoam-dong in Chungju and Cheongsong-ri in Buyeo were investigated in order to study the manufacturing technique and the provenance of lead. Chemical analysis using X-ray fluorescence showed that 33 bronzes consist of copper(Cu), tin(Sn) and lead(Pb) served as major elements. Major and minor elemental analyses by EPMA were performed on two mirrors and 2 weapons of the bronzes investigated. The results shows that bronze mirrors from Chungju and Buyeo were high-tin bronzes(> 30 wt%). And 20% of tin and 5% of lead were founded in bronze weapons. Iron, zinc, arsenic, silver, nickel, sulfur and cobalt detected in four bronzes as minor and trace elements. The four bronzes were alloyed considering their function and were not heat treated after casting due to their high tin content. Lead isotope analysis using TIMS indicates that thirty-three bronzes were distributed southern Korea peninsula except Zone 1. As a result, lead raw materials came from various regions in Korean Peninsula not from Gyeongsang-do regions. The manufacturing techniques of bronze ware generalized at this age, and bronze was produced in various sites using raw materials from various sources.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 국립문화재연구소

References

  1. 강대일, 홍종욱, 1998, 문화재 비파괴 분석법의 현황과 문제점 보존과학연구 19, pp.39-67.
  2. 국립부여문화재연구소, 2017, 부여 청송리 유적 국립문화재연구소, pp.44-53
  3. 김소진, 한우림, 황진주, 정연중, 한민수, 2015, 출토 지역과 시대에 따른 한국 청동기의 납동위원소비 분류 특성 보존과학연구 36,
  4. 이은우, 김소진, 한우림, 황진주, 한민수, 2017, 출토 청동유물 부식의 형태학적 고찰 및 부식생성물의 특성 연구 문화재46(3), pp.120-121.
  5. 중원문화재연구원, 2017, 충주 종합스포츠타운 조성사업부지 내 충주 호암동 유적 중원문화재연구원, pp. 1-2, 35-67.
  6. 한국기초과학지원연구원, 2014, 한반도 납동위원소비 분포도를 이용한 청동유물의 산지추정 국립문화재연구소
  7. 황진주, 2009, 우리나라 청동문화재의 주성분 조성분포 연구 명지대학교 석사학위논문
  8. 히라오 요시미츠 편저, 최영희 옮김, 2001, 문화재를 연구하는 과학의눈,학연문화사, p.37, 96.
  9. 馬淵久夫, 平尾良光, 1983, 鉛同位體比法による漢式鏡の研究(二) MUSEUM382, pp.16-26.
  10. 馬淵久夫, 平尾良光, 1987, 東アジア鉛鑲石の鉛伺位體比 考古學雜誌73-2, pp.199-245.
  11. Jeong Youn-Joong, Chenong Chang-sik, Shin Dong-bok, Lee Kwang-Sik, Jo Hui-Je, Mukesh Kumar Gautam, Lee In-sung, 2012, 'Regional variations in the lead isotopic composition of galena from southern Korea with implications for the discrimination of lead provenance', Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, pp.116-127.