DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Safety Techniques-Based Improvement of Task Execution Process Followed by Execution Maturity-Based Risk Management in Precedent Research Stage of Defense R&D Programs

국방 선행연구단계에서 안전분석 기법에 기반한 수행프로세스의 개선 및 수행성숙도 평가를 활용한 위험 관리

  • Received : 2018.07.26
  • Accepted : 2018.10.05
  • Published : 2018.10.31

Abstract

The precedent study stage of defense programs is a project stage that is conducted to support the determination of an efficient acquisition method of the weapon system determined by the requirement. In this study, the FTA/FMEA technique was used in the safety analysis process to identify elements to be conducted in the precedent study stage and a methodology for deriving the key review elements through conceptualization and tailoring was suggested. To supplement the key elements derived from the existing research, it is necessary to analyze various events that may arise from key elements. To accomplish this, the HAZOP technique for safety analysis in other industrial fields was used to supplement the results of kdy element derivation. We analyzed and modeled the execution procedure by establishing input/output information and association with the key elements of the precedent study stage derived by linking HAZOP/FTA/FMEA techniques. In addition, performance maturity was evaluated for performance of precedent study, and a risk-based response manual was generated based on inter-working information with key elements with low maturity. Based on the results of this study, it is possible to meet the performance, cost, and schedule of the project implementation through application of the key elements and procedures and the risk management response manual in the precedent study stage of the defense program.

Keywords

Weapon System;Systems Engineering;Precedent study;Defense project;Failure Mode & Effects Analysis;Fault-Tree Analysis;HAZOP;Weapon systems;Project management

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Department of Defense Instruction for Defense Force Development, Department of Defense, 2017.
  2. K.Y. Wig, C.S. HA, C.H. Jeon, J.H. Lee, "Effective linkage between weapons system decision making and project promotion methods", Korea Institute for Military Affairs, 2014.
  3. W.J. Pyun, S.K. Kim, J.H. Lee, "An Empirical Study on Managerial Factors Affecting Performance of Defense R&D Projects", Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, The Korea Database Society, vol.16(No.4), pp. 223-224, Dec. 2009.
  4. Defense Acquisition Program Administration Instruction for Defense Project management, DAPA, 2018.
  5. S.Y. Yun, S.H. Lee, J.H. Park, "Study on the promotion method of the precedent study specialization", SMI, 2014.
  6. Glancey, Jim. "Failure Analysis Methods-What, Why and How." Special Topics in Design. MEEG 466 (2006).
  7. S. Mergen, W.J. Schreiber-Prillwitz, P. Schmidt-Webe, "An Overview of System Safety Assessment Merging FMEA and FTA for safety analysis of sensors for automotive application", TDK-EPC, Sep. 2016.
  8. K.Y. Lee, B.R. Lee, H.Y. Lee, "Standard Model of Weapon systems Feasibility Study", Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, Seoul, Tech. Rep. DtaQ-10-2472-R, Nov. 2010.
  9. DAPA, "Systems Engineering Risk Management Guidebook", 2018.
  10. S.L. Kwak, W.H. Park, D.H. Koo, "A Study on Emergency Response Manuals for Urban Train Accident", 2014 Annual Meeting & Spring Conference of the Korean Society for Railway, pp.669-673, 2014.
  11. Bubbico, Roberto, Viviana Greco, and Carla Menale. "Hazardous scenarios identification for Li-ion secondary batteries." Safety science 108, pp.72-88, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.024