Effects of LED Light Quality of Urban Agricultural Plant Factories on the Growth of Daughter Plants of 'Seolhyang' Strawberry

  • Lee, Kook-Han (Korea Agency of Education, Promotion & Information Service in Food, Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries)
  • Received : 2018.09.21
  • Accepted : 2018.10.20
  • Published : 2018.10.31


This study was conducted to examine the influence of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) light quality in urban agricultural plant factories on the growth and development of Seolhyang strawberry daughter plants in order to improve the efficiency of daughter plant growth and urban agriculture. LED light quality by demonstrated that above-ground growth and development were greatest for daughter plant 2. Daughter plant 1 showed the next highest growth and development, followed by daughter plant 3. Among the different qualities of LED light, the stem was thickest and growth rate of leaves was highest for R + B III (LED quality: red 660 nm + blue 450 nm/photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD): $241-243{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$) and lowest for R (red $660nm/115-117{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$). Plant height, leaf width, petiole length, and the leaf growth rate were highest for W (white fluorescent lamp/$241-243{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$) and lowest for R + B I (red 660nm+blue 450nm/$80-82{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$). For above-ground growth and development, as the plants surpassed the seedling age, mixed light (red + blue), rather than monochromatic light (red or blue), and higher PPFD values tended to increase development. Regarding the quality of the LED light, daughter plant 2 showed the highest chlorophyll content, followed by daughter plant 1, and daughter plant 3 showed the least chlorophyll content. When the wavelength was monochromatic, chlorophyll content increased, compared to that when PPFD values were increased. Mixed light vitality was highest in daughter plant 2, followed by 1, and 3, showed increased photosynthesis when PPFD values were high with mixed light, in contrast to the results observed for chlorophyll content.


  1. Albregts, E. E., 1968, Influence of plant size at transplanting on strawberry fruit yield, Proceedings of the Florida state Hort. Soc., 81, 163-166.
  2. Brown, C. S., Schuerger, A. C., Seger, J. C., 1995, Growth and photomorphogenesis of plants under red light-emitting diodes with supple mental blue or far-red lighting, J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 120(5), 808-813.
  3. Choi, Y. W., Ahn, C. K., Son, B. G., Kang, J. S., Lee, Y. J., Chang, M. K., Son, K. W., Choi, Y. H., 2003, Response of growth and photosynthesis of pepper seedling to potassium fertilizer, J. Bio-Environ. Control, 12(1), 26-29.
  4. Chungnam Agricultural Research and Extension Services, 2009, Strawberry seedling cultivation technology for producing high quality seedlings, Chungnam Strawberry Industry-Academic-Research Cooperation Foundation, Korea.
  5. Eun, J. S., Choi, J. H., 2010, Effects of LEDs on growth of perilla(Perilla frutesens L.), Kor. J. Hort. Sci. & Tec., 28(5), 57-57.
  6. Fankhauser, C., Chory, J., 1997, Light control of plant development, Annual Rev. of Cell and Develop. Bio., 13, 203-229.
  7. Giannakou, I., Karpouzas, D., 2003, Evaluation of chemical and integrated strategies as alternatives to methyl bromide for the control of root-knot nematodes in Greece, Pest Manage. Sci., 59(8), 883-892.
  8. Ha, J. Y., Lee, S. S., Choi, G. S., Kang, S. M., 1997, Crop physiology, Hyang Moon Publisher, 129-138.
  9. Ito, T., 1997, The greenhouse and hydroponic industries of Japan, Acta Hort., 481(2), 761-764.
  10. Khan, N., Abas, N., 2011, Comparative study of energy saving light sources, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15(1), 296-309.
  11. Kim, K. S., Kim, M. K., Nam, S. W., 2004, Optimization of growth environment in the enclosed plant production system using photosynthesis efficiency model, Kor. Soc. Bio-Environ. Control, 13(4), 209-216.
  12. Kim, T. I., Kim, W. S., Choi, J. H., Jang, W. S., 1999, Comparison of runner production and growth characteristics among strawberry cultivars, Kor. J. Hort. Sci. & Tec., 17(2), 111-114.
  13. Kim, Y. H., Kim, D. E., Lee, G. I., Kang, D. H., 2011, Current status and development direction of the domestic and overseas for the artificial plant factory, Kor. J. Hort. Sci. & Tec., 29(10), 37-37.
  14. Lee, H. J., Lee, Y. B., Bae, J. H., 2004, Effect of root zone temperature on the growth and quality of single-stemmed rose in cutted rose production factory, J. Bio-Environ. Control, 13(4), 266-270.
  15. Lee, J. G., Oh, S. S., Cha, S. H., Jang, Y. A., Kim, S. Y., Um, Y. C., Jung, S. R., 2010, Effects of red/blue light ratio and short-term light quality conversion on growth and anthocyanin contents of baby leaf lettuce, J. Bio-Environ. Control, 19(4), 351-359.
  16. Lee, K. S., Choi, S. Y., 1999, Effect of soil water potential on stomatal conductance and photosynthesis of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.), Theses Collection of the Agricultural College, Chonbuk National University Institute Agri. Sci. & Tec., 30(1), 77-85.
  17. Lichtenthaler, H. K., Buschmann, C., Rahmsdorf, U., 1980, The blue light syndrome, Springer verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 485-494.
  18. Mohr, H., 1969, The physiology of plant growth and development, McGraw-Hill, London, 695.
  19. Oda, M., 1995, New grafting methods for fruit-bearing vegetables in Japan, Japan Agric. Res. Quarterly, 29(3), 187-194.
  20. Okamoto, K., Yanagi, T., Tanaka, S., Higuchi, T., Ushida, Y., Watanabe, H., 1996, Development of plant growth apparatus using blue and red LED as artificial light source, Acta Hort., 440, 111-116.
  21. Park, S. Y., Chang, M. S., Choi, J. H., Kim, B. D., Lee, S. R., Ham, K. H., 2007, Effect of a refrigerator with LED on functional composition changes and freshness prolongation of cabbage, Kor. J. Food Preserv., 14(2), 113-118.
  22. Salisbury, F. B., Ross, C. W., 1992, Plant physiology, 4th edition, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California, 682.
  23. Yanagi, T., Okamoto, K., Takita, S., 1996, Effects of blue, red and blue red light of two different PPF levels on growth and morphogensis of lettuce plants, Acta Hort., 440, 117-122.
  24. Yetisir, H., Sari, N., 2003, Effect of different rootstock on plant growth, yield, and quality of watermelon, Animal Production Sci., 43(10), 1269-1274.