DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Asian Airline Implementation of Smartphone Collaboration: From Training to Operations

스마트폰을 활용한 항공사의 협업 사례 연구: 훈련 기간과 운영 기간의 차이 분석

  • Dionne, Dante (Bushido Management) ;
  • Schutz, Douglas M. (Talent Management, Citizens Bank) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Young (Division of International Business, Konkuk Univerisity)
  • Received : 2018.07.12
  • Accepted : 2018.10.20
  • Published : 2018.10.28

Abstract

In order to provide quality services across international airports, airline personnel must rapidly and effectively develop and share knowledge. Combining components of adaptive structuration theory (AST) and media synchronicity theory (MST), a research framework was developed to convey three distinct stages of knowledge sharing. We use the grounded theory research method for the qualitative data collected from audio transcripts of employees learning how to use and work with company issued smartphones with push-to-talk functionalities. Data was collected from 33 operations personnel. The results of the content analysis are recorded for the elements of each of the three concepts of our research framework. During the social interaction stage, the content of the audio conversations shifts mainly from conflict management to task management; for media synchronicity, from quality to quantity; for productive outcomes, from efficiency to commitment. New insights are uncovered from our analysis of data from the field as users advance from learning how to use the mobile devices, to using the devices for managing knowledge for their work in the airline industry.

References

  1. S. Oh, J.M. Lee, & Y.-Y. Kim. (2017). A Study on the Job Satisfaction in the Smart Work Environment, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(11), 393-401. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.11.393
  2. Y.-Y. Kim. (2017). An Exploratory Study on the Role of Empathy for Facilitating Smart Work, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(5), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.5.201
  3. J.-Y. Lee & P.-S. Jang. (2017). Study on Research Trends in Airline Industry Using Keyword Network Analysis, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(5), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.5.169
  4. A.R. Dennis, R.M. Fuller, & J.S. Valacich. (2008). Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes, MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575-600. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148857
  5. G. DeSanctis & M.S. Poole. (1994). Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use, Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
  6. E.M. Rogers. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press.
  7. K. Olesen & M.D. Myers. (1999). Trying to Improve Communication and Collaboration with Information Technology, Information Technology & People, 12(4), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593849910301621
  8. W.J. Orlikowski. (1992). Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation, ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 362-369.
  9. J. Halloran, Y. Rogers, & M. Scaife. (2002). Taking the 'No' out of Lotus Notes, Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, 169-178.
  10. A. Giddens. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory, University of California Press.
  11. M.S. Poole and G. DeSanctis. (2004). Structuration Theory in Information Systems Research: Methods and Controversies, IDEA Group Publishing.
  12. W. Orlikowski & D. Robey. (1991). Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations, Information Systems Research, 2(2), 143-169. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.2.143
  13. A. Majchrzak, R.E. Rice, A. Malhotra, N. King, & S. Ba. (2000). Technology Adaptation, MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 569-600. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250948
  14. W.D. Salisbury, W.W. Chin, A. Gopal, & P.R. Newsted. (2002). Better Theory Through Measurement, Information Systems Research, 13(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.91.93
  15. S.R. Barley. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78-108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392767
  16. A. Sivunen & M. Valo. (2006). Team Leaders' Technology Choice in Virtual Teams, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2006.870458
  17. R.L. Daft & R.H. Lengel. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design, Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  18. J. Fulk. (1993). Social Construction of Communication Technology, Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921-950. https://doi.org/10.2307/256641
  19. K. Charmaz. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Research, Sage.
  20. K.A. Neuendorf. (2016). The Content Analysis Guidebook, Sage.
  21. J.W. Creswell. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Sage.
  22. A.M. Tashakkori & C.B. Teddlie, Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Sage, 1998.
  23. M.D. Myers. (2013). Qualitative Research in Business and Management, Sage.
  24. A. Strauss & J. Corbin (1994). Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview, Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, 273-285.
  25. B.G. Glaser and A.L. Strauss. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine Publishing.
  26. B.G. Glaser. (1978), Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory, Sociology Press.
  27. R.E. Nisbett. (2004). The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently...and Why, The Free Press.