DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the evaluation model of project

<인생나눔교실> 사업 평가모형 개발 연구

  • Lee, Sang-Min (Catholic College, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 이상민 (가톨릭대학교 학부대학)
  • Received : 2018.09.03
  • Accepted : 2018.10.20
  • Published : 2018.10.28

Abstract

In this study, the evaluation index was developed to design the project evaluation model, and the weight was given through the AHP survey. project was evaluated for the first time by using the designed evaluation model for the field appraisal. As a result, it was revealed that the weight of the propriety index of the participant effect and the project content was the highest among 20 indexes. This study is significant in having built a base on which the evaluation system could be stabilized, by developing the integrative project evaluation model of . However, we have yet to adequately address the evaluator's acceptability and efficacy in evaluating indicators. The validity and continuity of the evaluation model will be secured through this.

Keywords

;Project evaluation;Evaluation index;Evaluation model;Weight

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Catholic University of Korea

References

  1. S. J. Yoon, K. H. Lee & J. H. Hong. (2008). Comparative analysis of overseas case on performance management system, Seoul : KIPA.
  2. S. B. Park. (2000). Lecture in Policy Studies. Seoul : Daeyoung.
  3. J. Y. Lee. (2004). Constructing the Indicators for Cultural Policy Evaluation. Korean journal of policy analysis and evaluation, 14(1), 129-150.
  4. H. S. Yim, S. H. Park, S. M. Lee & K. J. Chae. (2012). A study on development of performance evaluation model of social arts and culture education policy. Journal of digital content & cultural policy, 137-167.
  5. S. K. Baik, J. H. Gwon & J. H. Lee. (2013). The research of CT R&D's performance assessment model, 28, 189-217.
  6. B. Y. Choe & S. H. Kim. (2015). The application of the balanced scorecard for the arts and cultural sector, 33, 89-129.
  7. Korea arts & culture education service. (2017). Fundamental research on building indicators of cultural arts education effectiveness, Seoul : arte.
  8. Korea arts & culture education service. (2017). Establishment and investigation of detailed indicators of cultural arts education effectiveness, Seoul : arte.
  9. Korea arts & culture education service. (2017). The Study of Kundarak Saturday Cultural School evaluation, Seoul : arte.
  10. Korea arts & culture education service. (2017). Research on ODA project performance evaluation of culture arts education, Seoul : arte.
  11. E. S. Cho & S. J. Lee. (2011). A study on the korean performance evaluation system, 13(1), 161-198.
  12. D. L. Stufflebeam. (2001). Evaluation Models. New Directions for Evaluation, 89, 7-98.
  13. S. M. Lee. (2012). A Study on Evaluation Theory and Model Based on Philosophical Paradigm. Korea journal of policy analysis and evaluation, 22(1), 59-89.
  14. Saaty, Thomas. L. (1982). Decision Making For Leader: The AHP for Decisions in a Complex World. CA : Wadsworth.
  15. C. Y. Kim. (2011). How to improve the evaluation methods of IT outcomes in government organizations. Journal of digital policy & management, 9(2), 15-31.
  16. Arts Council Korea. (2016). Introductory textbook for mentors, Naju : Arco.
  17. Arts Council Korea. (2016). A study of project evaluation, Naju : Arco.
  18. Arts Council Korea. (2017). A study of project evaluation, Naju : Arco.
  19. J. S. Wholey. (1997). Clarifying Goals, Reporting Results. New Directions for Evaluation, 76, 95-105.
  20. T. H. Poister. (2003). Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
  21. H. P. Hatry. (1989). Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting: Its Time has Come. Washington. DC: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
  22. J. W. Hedge & M. S, Teachout. (2000). Exploring the Concept of Acceptability as a Criterion for Evaluating Performance Measures. Group & Organization Management, 25(2), 22-44.
  23. J. M. Yang. (2017). The success factors of performance evaluation on the public sector. The Graduate school the Catholic University of Korea.
  24. R. L. Dipboye & R. dePontbriand. (1981). Correlates of Employee Reactions to Performance Appraisals and Appraisal Systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2), 248-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.2.248
  25. G. H. Kim, J. G. Kim & S. J. Lee. (2008). Development of Ubiquitous Information Projects Evaluation Models and Indexes. The journal of digital policy & management, 6(3), 1-11.
  26. E. R. House. (1993). Professional Evaluation: Social Impact and Political Consequence. CA: Sage.