DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Variations in mitochondrial cytochrome b region among Ethiopian indigenous cattle populations assert Bos taurus maternal origin and historical dynamics

  • Tarekegn, Getinet Mekuriaw ;
  • Ji, Xiao-yang ;
  • Bai, Xue ;
  • Liu, Bin ;
  • Zhang, Wenguang ;
  • Birungi, Josephine ;
  • Djikeng, Appolinaire ;
  • Tesfaye, Kassahun
  • Received : 2017.08.11
  • Accepted : 2018.03.13
  • Published : 2018.09.01

Abstract

Objective: This study was carried out to assess the haplotype diversity and population dynamics in cattle populations of Ethiopia. Methods: We sequenced the complete mitochondrial cytochrome b gene of 76 animals from five indigenous and one Holstein Friesian${\times}$Barka cross bred cattle populations. Results: In the sequence analysis, 18 haplotypes were generated from 18 segregating sites and the average haplotype and nucleotide diversities were $0.7540{\pm}0.043$ and $0.0010{\pm}0.000$, respectively. The population differentiation analysis shows a weak population structure (4.55%) among the populations studied. Majority of the variation (95.45%) is observed by within populations. The overall average pair-wise distance ($F_{ST}$) was 0.049539 with the highest ($F_{ST}=0.1245$) and the lowest ($F_{ST}=0.011$) $F_{ST}$ distances observed between Boran and Abigar, and Sheko and Abigar from the indigenous cattle, respectively. The phylogenetic network analysis revealed that all the haplotypes detected clustered together with the Bos taurus cattle and converged to a haplogroup. No haplotype in Ethiopian cattle was observed clustered with the reference Bos indicus group. The mismatch distribution analysis indicates a single population expansion event among the cattle populations. Conclusion: Overall, high haplotype variability was observed among Ethiopian cattle populations and they share a common ancestor with Bos taurus.

Keywords

Cytochrome b;Ethiopian Cattle;Haplotype Diversity;Population Expansion

References

  1. Loftus RT, MacHugh DE, Bradley DG, Sharp PM, Cunningham P. Evidence for two independent domestications of cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:2757-61. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.7.2757
  2. Troy CS, MacHugh DE, Bailey JF, et al. Genetic evidence for Near-Eastern origins of European cattle. Nature 2001;410:1088-99. https://doi.org/10.1038/35074088
  3. Achilli A, Bonfiglio S, Olivieri A. The multifaceted origin of taurine cattle reflected by the mitochondrial genome. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e5753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005753
  4. Wetterstrom W. Foraging and farming in Egypt: the transition from hunting and gathering to horticultures in the Nile Valley. In: Shaw T, Sinclair P, Andah B, Okpoko A, editors. The archaeology of Africa: food, metals and towns. London, UK: Routledge; 1993. p. 165-226.
  5. Honegger M. Kerma and the beginnings of the African Neolithic. Genava n.s., 2005;53:239-49.
  6. Edea Z, Bhuiyan MSA, Dessie T, et al. Genome-wide genetic diversity, population structure and admixture analysis in African and Asian cattle breeds. Animal 2015;9:218-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002560
  7. Li MH, Zerabruk M, Vangen O, Olsaker I, Kantanen J. Reduced genetic structure of north Ethiopian cattle revealed by Y-chromosome analysis. Heredity 2007;98:214-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800931
  8. Chen S, Lin BZ, Baig M, et al. Zebu cattle are an exclusive legacy of the South Asia neolithic. Mol Biol Evol 2010;27:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp213
  9. Clutton-Brock J. Cattle in ancient north Africa. In: Clutton-Brock J, editor. The walking larder: pattern of domestication, pastoralism, and predation. London, UK: Unwin Hyman; 1989. pp. 200-14.
  10. Decker JE, McKay SD, Rolf MM, et al. Worldwide patterns of ancestry, divergence, and admixture in domesticated cattle. PLoS Genet 2014;10:e1004254. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004254
  11. Dadi H, Tibbo M, Takahashi Y, et al. Variation in mitochondrial DNA and maternal genetic ancestry of Ethiopian cattle populations. Anim Genet 2009;40:556-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.01866.x
  12. Rege JE. The state of African cattle genetic resources I. Classification framework and identification of threatened and extinct breeds. Anim Genet Res Inf 1999;25:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900003448
  13. Dadi H, Tibbo M, Takahashi Y, et al. Microsatellite analysis reveals high genetic diversity but low genetic structure in Ethiopian indigenous cattle populations. Anim Genet 2008; 39:425-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01748.x
  14. Solomon D. Genetic diversity study of five Ethiopian indigenous bovine breeds using microsatellite markers. A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Addis Ababa University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in biotechnology. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University; 2011.
  15. Bruford MW, Hanotte O, Brookfield JY, Burke T. Single-locus and multilocus DNA fingerprinting. In: Hoelzel AR (ed.) Molecular genetic analysis of populations: a practical approach. Oxford, UK: IRL Press; 1992. pp. 225-69.
  16. Lan-Ping W, Rong-Qing G, Hong C. Mitochondrial DNA diversity and origin of Chinese Leiqiong cattle. J Anim Vet Adv 2009;8:1312-5.
  17. Librados P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1451-2. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187
  18. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 2010;10:564-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x
  19. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013;30:2725-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  20. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Rohl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 1999;16: 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036
  21. Cai X, Chen H, Lei C, et al. mtDNA diversity and genetic lineages of eighteen cattle breeds from Bos taurus and Bos indicus in China. Genetica 2007;131:175-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-006-9129-y
  22. Hedrick P, Kumar S. Mutation and linkage disequilibrium in human mtDNA. Eur J Hum Genet 2001;9:969-72. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200735
  23. Salim B, Taha KM, Hanotte O, Mwacharo JM. Historical demographic profiles and genetic variation of the East African Butana and Kenana indigenous dairy zebu cattle. Anim Genet 2014;45:782-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12225
  24. Lau CH, Drinkwater RD, Yusoff K, et al. Genetic diversity of Asian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): mitochondrial DNA D-loop and cytochrome b sequence variation. Anim Genet 1998;29:253-64. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.1998.00309.x
  25. Zerabruk M, Li MH, Kantanen J, et al. Genetic diversity and admixture of indigenous cattle from North Ethiopia: implications of historical introgressions in the gateway region to Africa. Anim Genet 2011;43:257-66.
  26. Hanotte O, Tawah CL, Bradley DG, et al. Geographic distribution and frequency of a taurine Bos taurine and an indicine Bos indicus Y specific allele amongst sub-Saharan African cattle breeds. Mol Ecol 2000;9:387-96. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00858.x
  27. Takele TD, Workneh A, Hegde BP. Farmers' perceptions on trypanosomosis and trypanotolerance character of the taurine Sheko. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012;44:609-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9943-9
  28. Mannen H, Kohno M, Nagata Y, et al. Independent mitochondrial origin and historical genetic differentiation in North Eastern Asian cattle. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2004;32:539-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2004.01.010
  29. Lai SJ, Liu YP, Liu YX, Li XW, Yao YG. Genetic diversity and origin of Chinese cattle revealed by mtDNA D-loop sequence variation. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2006;38:146-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.06.013
  30. Bradley DG, MacHugh DE, Cunningham P, Loftus RT. Mitochondrial diversity and the origins of African and European cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:5131-5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.10.5131

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China