DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Analysis of Structural Relationships among Public Technology Transfer, Technological Performance, and R&D Productivity

공공기술 이전, 기술적 성과, 연구개발 생산성 간의 구조적 관계 분석

  • 전지은 (국회입법조사처 과학방송통신팀) ;
  • 권상집 (동국대학교 상경대학 경영학부)
  • Received : 2017.10.09
  • Accepted : 2018.03.28
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

This study aims to identify the causal relationship among public technology transfer, technological performance, and research and development (R&D) productivity. Using the impulse-response function(IRF) of a panel vector autoregressive model (panel VAR), this study suggests the results of how long the factors such as technological performance (patent), public technology transfer, and R&D productivity takes and lasts if a one-unit shock of standard deviation occurs. As a result, first, the increase of public technology transfer activities has no power to increase the technology performance but improve the R&D productivity. If the public institute increases its technology transfer activities by one unit, the R&D productivity will increase within five years. Second, the impact of increasing technological performance on improvement of public technology transfer and R&D productivity is an insignificant. Third, the effect of R&D productivity on the public technology transfer creates a substantial reaction after a current time. Considering the structural relationships among public technology transfer, technological performance, and R&D productivity, if policy makers intend to construct the active R&D circumstance, technology suppliers should be motivated to run the active R&D mechanism because they achieve gains.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 과학기술정책연구원

References

  1. 강대석, 전병훈, 김능진 2012. "공공연구기관의 지적 자본 측정 및 인과관계 연구," 지식경영연구(13:4), pp. 55-70.
  2. 구본철 2014. "연구성과의 기술이전 및 사업화 촉진요인 도출 및 실증분석," 벤처창업연구 (9:5), pp. 69-81.
  3. 권상집, 백서인, 김희태, 장현준, 김성진 2013. "기업가적 의지, 조직학습, 기술/시장 변화에 의한 대학발 창업 벤처기업의 기회실현 과정: i-KAIST 탐색적 사례연구," 지식경영연구 (14:5), pp. 55-80.
  4. 김명희 2014. "새로운 유형의 기업가정신," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지 (12:2), pp. 44-51.
  5. 김슬기, 연승민, 강인제, 이병희 2016. "정부출연연구기관의 기술이전 영향 요인 분석: 국가 R&D 과제 특성을 중심으로," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지 (16:8), pp. 624-639. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.08.624
  6. 박검진, 김병근, 조현정 2011. "우리나라 대학의 특허 창출과 기술이전 성과에 영향을 주는 요인 연구," 산업재산권 (35), pp. 149-198.
  7. 박규호 2012. "국가 R&D 성과 기술이전의 결정요인에 관한 연구: 개별 특허 수준의 라이센싱을 대상으로," 지식재산연구 (7:3), pp. 187-215.
  8. 박영상, 이우진 2016. "공공조직의 사내기업가정신 인식이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향," 벤처창업연구 (11:6), pp. 83-98.
  9. 백서인, 김희태, 권상집 2014. "중국 3대 경제권 자동차 산업에 대한 연구: 기술학습, 아키텍처, 클러스터를 중심으로," 지식경영연구 (15:4), pp. 147-170. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2014.15.4.008
  10. 서리빈, 윤현덕 2012. "개방형 혁신과 조직학습 특성이 벤처기업의 기술경쟁우위에 미치는 영향," 지식경영연구 (13:2), pp. 73-98.
  11. 성웅현, 문혜정, 강훈 2015. "공공기술 이전, 사업화 영향요인 및 연구개발 관리전략," 기술혁신학회지 (18:3), pp. 468-491.
  12. 양동우, 김수정 2008. "기술공급자(R&D기관)의 기술이전 애로요인에 관한 기초연구," 대한경영학회지 (21:1), pp. 205-227.
  13. 여인국, 유왕진 2008. "공공기술이전 성과의 영향요인 분석," 한국경영공학회지 (13:3), pp. 185-196.
  14. 윤지영, 민진영, 한세희, 이희석 2010. "개방형 혁신이 산업에 미치는 효과: 슘페터 경쟁 하의 전략적 제휴를 중심으로," 지식경영연구 (11:4), pp. 1-19.
  15. 이상훈, 권상집 2015. "국내 중소기업의 기술융합 전략 및 성장 정책: IT & BT 융합기술 기반 네트워크 분석," 지식경영연구 (16:2), pp. 113-137. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2015.16.2.006
  16. 이성상 2016. "공공부문 기술사업화 기업 10년: 국가혁신 관점에서 본 성과와 과제," 한국혁신학회지 (11:2), pp. 33-52.
  17. 이재헌, 정명선 2016. "특허의 특성이 시장, 기술영역에서의 확산성과에 미치는 영향," 지식재산연구 (11:2), pp. 223-246.
  18. 임채윤, 이윤준 2007. 기술이전 성공요인 분석을 통한 기술사업화 활성화 방안: 정부출연연구소를 중심으로, 과학기술정책연구원 보고서.
  19. 정지용, 권상집 2017. "대전시 문화기술(Culture Technology) 기업의 기회 탐색: 기업가적 지향성과 조직의 폐기학습 흡수역량을 중심으로," 한국창업학회지 (12:2), pp. 1-30.
  20. 한동성 2010. "SFA를 이용한 국내 대학 기술이전전담조직(TLO)의 기술이전 효율성 분석에 관한 연구," 한국기술혁신학회 춘계학술대회 발표논문집, pp. 318-341.
  21. Abrigo, M., and Love, I. 2016. "Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata," The Stata Journal (16:3), pp. 778-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1601600314
  22. Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. B. 1989. "Patents as a measure of innovative activity," KYKLOS (42:2), pp. 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1989.tb00186.x
  23. Anderson, R., Daim, U., and Lavoie, F. 2007. "Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer," Technovation (27:5), pp. 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.003
  24. Anderson, W., and Hsiao, C. 1982. "Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data," Journal of Econometrics (18:1), pp. 47-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(82)90095-1
  25. Arellano, M., and Bond, R. 1991. "Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and components models," Review of Economic Studies (58:2), pp. 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
  26. Arellano, M., and Bover, O. 1995. "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models," Journal of Econometrics (68:1), pp. 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
  27. Bellone, C. J., and Goerl, G. F. 1992. "Reconciling public entrepreneurship and democracy," Public Administration Review (52:2), pp. 130-134. https://doi.org/10.2307/976466
  28. Cantwell, J. A., and Hodson, C. 1991. Global R&D and UK competitiveness, in M. C. Casson (ed.), Global research strategy and international competitiveness, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  29. Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  30. Chiu, Y. C., and Shyu, J. Z. 2004. "Applying multivariate timeseries models to technological product sales forecasting," International Journal of Technology Management (27:2-3), pp. 306-319. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2004.003957
  31. Cincera, M. 1997. "Patents, R&D, and technological spillovers at the firm level: Some evidence from econometric count model for panel data," Journal of Applied Econometrics (12:3), pp. 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199705)12:3<265::AID-JAE439>3.0.CO;2-J
  32. Cohen, W., Nelson, R., and Walsh, J. 2002. "Links and impacts: The influences of public research on industrial R&D," Management Science (48:1), pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
  33. Daghfous, A. 2004. "Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices," SAM Advanced Management Journal (69:2), pp. 21-27.
  34. Desyllas, P., and Hughes, A. 2010. "Do high technology acquires become more innovative?," Research Policy (39:8), pp. 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.005
  35. Friedman, J., and Silberman, J. 2003. "Un iversity technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter?," Journal of Technology Transfer (28:1), pp. 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021674618658
  36. Geisler, E., and Clements, C. 1995. Commercialization of technology from Federal laboratories: The effects of barriers, incentives, and the roles of internal entrepreneurship, Whitewater, WI: Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Wisconsin.
  37. Gil, Y., Bong, S., and Lee, J. 2003. "Integration model of technology internalization modes and learning strategy: Globally late starter Samsung' s successful practices in Korea," Technovation (23:4), pp. 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00110-9
  38. Hamilton, D., and Herrera, M. 2004. "Oil shocks and aggregate macroeconomic behavior: The role of monetary policy," Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking (36:2), pp. 265-286. https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2004.0012
  39. Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., and Rosen, H. 1988. "Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data," Econometrica (56:6), pp. 1371-1395. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913103
  40. Jeon, J., Hong, S., Yang, T., and Ohm, J. 2015. "Causal relationships among technology acquisition, absorptive capacity, and innovation performance: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry,"PLoSOne(10:7),pp.1-14.
  41. Jeon, J., Hong, S., Yang, T., and Ohm, J. 2016. "How technological innovation affects the structure of an industr y: Entrepreneurship evolution in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry since 1980," Technology Analysis & Strategic Management ( 28:6), p p. 733-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1142073
  42. Kilian, L. 2001. "Impulse response analysis in vector autoregression with unknown lag order," Journal of Forecasting (20:3), pp. 161-179. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-131X(200104)20:3<161::AID-FOR770>3.0.CO;2-X
  43. Kim, Y., and Lee, B. 2002. "Patterns of technological learning among the strategic groups in the Korean electronic parts industry," Research Policy (31:4), pp. 543-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00127-5
  44. Kim, Y., Song, K., and Lee, J. 1993. "Determinants of technological innovation in the small firms of Korea," R&D Management (23:3), pp. 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1993.tb00824.x
  45. Kim, Y. 2013. "The ivory tower approach to entrepreneurial linkage: Productivity changes in university technology transfer," Journal of Technology Transfer (38:2), pp. 180-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9217-8
  46. Kwon, S. J., Park, E., Ohm, J. Y., and Yoo, K. 2015. "Innovation activities and the creation of new employment: An empirical assessment of South Korea's manufacturing industry," Social Science Information (54:3), pp. 354-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018415580190
  47. Love, I., and Zicchino, L. 2006. "Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from Panel VAR," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (46:2), pp. 190-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.007
  48. Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B., and Gianiodis, P. T. 2005. "Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer," Journal of Business Venturing (20:2), pp. 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003
  49. Morris, M. H., and Jones, F. F. 1999. "Entrepreneurship in established organizations: The case of the public sector," Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice (24:1), pp. 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902400105
  50. Napolitano, G., and Sirlli, G. 1990. "The patent system and the exploitation of inventions: Results of a statistical survey conducted in Italy," Technovation (10:1), pp. 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(90)90038-L
  51. Nunes, A., and Balsa, C. 2013. "Clustering entrepreneurship aspirations: Innovation, growth, and international orientation of activities," International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development (5:2), pp. 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2013.055235
  52. OECD. 2013. Commercializing public research: New trends and strategies, OECD Research Report.
  53. Osborne, D., and Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector, Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley Public Comp.
  54. Patel, P., and Pavitt, K. 1994. "Uneven (and divergent) technological accumulation among advanced countries: Evidence and a framework of explanation," Industrial and Corporate Change (3:1), pp. 759-787. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.3.759
  55. Roessner, D. 2000. "Quantitative and qualitative methods and measures in the evaluation of research," Research Evaluation (9:2), pp. 125-132. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154400781777296
  56. Sandelin, J. 1994. Knowledge transfers through patenting and licensing, Stanford University, Office of Technology Licensing, Unpublished Paper.
  57. Scotchmer, S. 2006. Innovation and incentives, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  58. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., and Link, A. N. 2004. "Toward a model of the ef fective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (21:1), pp. 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
  59. Stock, H., and Watson, W. 2003. Introduction to econometrics, US: Addison Wesley, 840.
  60. Szulanski, G. 2000. "The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (82:1), pp. 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2884
  61. Winebrake, J. 1992. "An analysis of technology transfer mechanisms for federally funded R&D," Journal of Technology Transfer (17:4), pp. 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172612
  62. Zhao, F. 2001. Managing innovation and quality of collaborative R&D, Paper presented at the conference proceedings of 5th International & 8th National Research Conference, Melbourne.