DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the seismic performance of existing RC buildings designed to different codes

  • Zeris, Christos A. (Department of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, University Campus) ;
  • Repapis, Constantinos C. (Department of Civil Engineering, University of West Attica)
  • Received : 2017.11.07
  • Accepted : 2018.04.02
  • Published : 2018.06.25

Abstract

Static pushover analyses of typical existing reinforced concrete frames, designed according to the previous generations of design codes in Greece, have established these structures' inelastic characteristics, namely overstrength, global ductility capacity and available behaviour factor q, under planar response. These were compared with the corresponding demands at the collapse limit state target performance point. The building stock considered accounted for the typical variability, among different generations of constructed buildings in Greece, in the form, the seismic design code in effect and the material characteristics. These static pushover analyses are extended, in the present study, in the time history domain. Consequently, the static analysis predictions are compared with Incremental Dynamic Analysis results herein, using a large number of spectrum compatible recorded base excitations of recent destructive earthquakes in Greece and abroad, following, for comparison, similar conventional limiting failure criteria as before. It is shown that the buildings constructed in the 70s exhibit the least desirable behaviour, followed by the buildings constructed in the 60s. As the seismic codes evolved, there is a notable improvement for buildings of the 80s, when the seismic code introduced end member confinement and the requirement for a joint capacity criterion. Finally, buildings of the 90s, designed to modern codes exhibit an exceptionally good performance, as expected by the compliance of this code to currently enforced seismic provisions worldwide.

References

  1. Anagnostopoulos, S. and Lekidis, V. (1986), "Seismic design based on the new provisions of the design code: application examples, instructions and parametric investigations", ITSAK, Thessaloniki. (in Greek)
  2. Applied Technology Council (1996), "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings", Report ATC 40 / SSC 96-01, Palo Alto.
  3. Bala, I.E., Crowley, H., Pinho, R. and Gülay, F.G. (2008), "Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment models", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 28, 914-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.005
  4. Benavent-Climent, A. and Zahran, R. (2010), "Seismic evaluation of existing RC frames with wide beams using an energy-based approach", Earthq. Struct., 1(1), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.1.093
  5. Borzi, B., Vona, M., Masi, A., Pinho, R. and Pola, D.C. (2013), "Seismic demand estimation of RC frame buildings based on simplified and nonlinear dynamic analyses", Earthq. Struct., 4(2), 157-179. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.2.157
  6. Bracci, J.M., Reinhorn, A.M. and Mander, J.B. (1995), "Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed for gravity loads: performance of structural system", ACI Struct. J., 92(5), 597-609.
  7. De Stefano, M., Tanganelli, M. and Viti, S. (2013), "On the variability of concrete strength as a source of irregularity in elevation for existing RC buildings: a case study", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 11, 1711-1726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9463-2
  8. Decanini, L., de Sortis, A., Goretti, A., Liberatore, L., Mollaioli, F. and Bazzurro, P. (2004), "Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake", Earthqu. Spectra, 20(1), 221-256. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1765107
  9. EAK (2000), Ministry of Environment, Planning and Public Works, "Greek Earthquake Resistant Design Code", Decree 2184B/20.12.1999, 1154B/12.8.2003, Athens, Greece. (in Greek)
  10. EC1 (2002), European Committee for Standardization, EN-1991, Eurocode No. 1, "Actions on Structures", Brussels.
  11. EC2 (2004), European Committee for Standardization, EN-1992-1-1, "Eurocode No. 2, Design of Concrete Structures, Part 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings", Brussels.
  12. EC8 (2004), European Committee for Standardization, EN-1998-1, Eurocode No. 8, "Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings and National Annex", Brussels.
  13. Ehlers, G. (1960), "Beton-Kalender. Taschenbuch für Beton- und Stahlbetonbau sowie die verwandten Facher", 2, Verlag Von Wilhelm Ernst & Sohn, Berlin. (in German)
  14. EKOS (2000), Ministry of Public Works, "Greek Code for Design of Concrete Works", Decree 1329B/6.11.2000, Athens, Greece. (in Greek)
  15. Eleftheriadou, A. and Karabinis, A. (2012), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings based on damage data after a near field earthquake (7 September 1999 Athens-Greece)", Earthq. Struct., 3(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.2.117
  16. Fajfar, P. (1999), "Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28, 979-993. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979::AID-EQE850>3.0.CO;2-1
  17. Favvata, M.J., Naoum, M.C. and Karayannis, C.G. (2013), "Limit states of RC structures with first floor irregularities", Struct. Eng. Mech., 47(6), 791-818. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.47.6.791
  18. FEMA (2000), "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 356)", Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington (DC).
  19. Ghobarah, A., Aly, N.M. and El-Attar, M. (1998), "Seismic reliability assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings, J. Earthq. Eng., 2(4), 569-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469809350335
  20. Hueste, M.B.D. and Bai, J.W. (2007), "Seismic retrofit of a reinforced concrete flat-slab structure: Part I-seismic performance evaluation", Eng. Struct., 29, 1165-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.023
  21. IAEE (2008), "Regulations for seismic design; A world list-2008", http://www.iaee.or.jp/
  22. Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G., Polese, M., Verderame, G.M. and Fabbrocino, G. (2007), "Seismic risk of R.C. building classes", Eng. Struct., 29, 813-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.019
  23. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, G.D.P.K. (1998), "Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation", Eng. Struct., 20(4-6), 452-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8
  24. La Brusco, A., Mariani V., Tanganelli M., Viti S. and De Stefano M., (2015), "Seismic assessment of a real RC asymmetric hospital building according to NTC 2008 analysis methods", Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13, 2973-2994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9758-6
  25. LC45 (1945), Ministry of Public Works, "Greek Loadings Code", G.G. 325 Α 31.12.45, Athens, Greece. (in Greek)
  26. Lima, C., De Stefano, G. and Martinelli, E. (2014), "Seismic response of masonry infilled RC frames: practice-oriented models and open issues", Earthq. Struct., 6(4), 409-436. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.4.409
  27. Lynch, K.P., Rowe, K.L. and Liel, A.B. (2011), "Seismic performance of reinforced concrete frame buildings in Southern California", Earthq. Spectra, 27(2), 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3570684
  28. Mehani, Y., Bechtoula, H., Kibboua, A. and Naili, M. (2013), "Assessment of seismic fragility curves for existing RC buildings in Algiers after the 2003 Boumerdes earthquake", Struct. Eng. Mech., 46(6), 791-808. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.46.6.791
  29. MOD84 (1984), Ministry of Public Works, "Amendments and Additions to the RD of 26/2/59", Decree 239B/6-4-1984, Athens, Greece. (in Greek)
  30. Mwafy, A.M. and Elnashai, A.S. (2001), "Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings", Eng. Struct., 23, 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00068-7
  31. NEAK (1995), Ministry of Environment, Planning and Public Works, "Greek Earthquake Resistant Design Code", Decree 534Β/20-6-1995, Athens, Greece, (in Greek)
  32. NEKOS (1991), Ministry of Public Works, "New Greek Code for Design of Concrete Works", Decree 1068Β/31-12-1991, Athens, Greece. (in Greek)
  33. Nguyen, X.H. and Nguyen, H.C. (2016), "Seismic behavior of non-seismically designed reinforced concrete frame structure", Earthq. Struct., 11(2), 281-295. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.2.281
  34. Ni, P. (2014), "Seismic assessment and retrofitting of existing structure based on nonlinear static analysis", Struct. Eng. Mech., 49(5), 631-644. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.49.5.631
  35. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.N.J. (1992), Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
  36. Pianigiani, M. and Mariani, V. (2017), "Sensitivity study on the discretionary numerical model assumptions in the seismic assessment of existing buildings", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 98, 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.001
  37. Prakash, V., Powell, G.H. and Campbell, S. (1993), "Drain-2DX: Base program description and user guide", Version 1.10, Report No. UCB/SEMM-93/17, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
  38. RD59 (1959), Ministry of Public Works, "Earthquake design regulation of building works", Royal Decree 26/2/59, Decree 36Α/26/2/59, Greece, (in Greek)
  39. Repapis, C. (2002), "DrainExplorer, a Drain-2DX post-processor program", Reinforced Concrete Laboratory, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Greece.
  40. Repapis, C., Vintzileou, E. and Zeris, C. (2006a), "Evaluation of the seismic performance of existing RC buildings: I. Suggested methodology", J. Earthq. Eng., 10(2), 265-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460609350596
  41. Repapis, C., Zeris, C. and Vintzileou, E. (2006b), "Evaluation of the seismic performance of existing RC buildings: II. A case study for regular and irregular buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 10(3), 429-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460609350604
  42. Salvitti, L.M. and Elnashai, A.S. (1996), "Evaluation of Behaviour Factors for RC buildings by nonlinear dynamic analysis", Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico.
  43. Tanganelli, M., Viti, S., Mariani, V. and Pianigiani, M. (2017), "Seismic assessment of existing RC buildings under alternative ground motion ensembles compatible to EC8 and NTC 2008", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 15, 1375-1396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0028-z
  44. Thermou, G.E. and Pantazopoulou, S.J. (2011), "Assessment indices for the seismic vulnerability of existing R.C. buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(3), 293-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1028
  45. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2003), "Applied incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Spectra, 20(2), 525-533.
  46. Whittaker, A., Hart, G. and Rojahn, C. (1999), "Seismic response modification factors", J. Struct. Eng., 125(4), 438-444. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(438)
  47. Zeris, C., Giannitsas, P., Alexandropoulos, K. and Vamvatsikos, D, (2006), "Inelastic modeling sensitivity of the predicted seismic performance of an existing RC building", Proceedings of the 13th European Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Geneva, Switzerland.
  48. Zeris, C., Vamvatsikos, D., Giannitsas, P. and Alexandropoulos, K. (2007), "Impact of FE modeling in the seismic performance prediction of existing RC buildings", ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, COMPDYN 2007, Rethymnon.