Performance analysis of dynamic positioning system with loss of propulsion power of T/S NARA

실습선 나라호의 추진력 상실에 따른 동적위치제어시스템의 성능 분석

  • 이준호 (부경대학교 실습선 나라호) ;
  • 공경주 (부경대학교 실습선 나라호) ;
  • 정봉규 (부경대학교 실습선 나라호)
  • Received : 2018.04.02
  • Accepted : 2018.05.17
  • Published : 2018.05.31


In order for the probe to perform ocean exploration and survey research, it is necessary to adjust the position of the ship as desired by dynamic positioning system. The dynamic positioning system of T/S NARA is applied to K-POS dynamic positioning system of Kongsberg, which makes maintaining the ship's position, changing position and heading control possible. T/S NARA is not capable of dynamic positioning if one or more propulsive forces are lost with DP Level One. However, it is predicted that dynamic positioning can be achieved even at the time of missing one thrust in a good sea condition. Therefore, we want to analyze the effect of each propulsion on the performance of dynamic position system. When one of the bow thruster and azimuth thrusters lost their propulsion, maintaining the ship's position, changing position and heading control performance were compared and analyzed. If the situation occurred disable from using the bow thruster, they can not maintain ship's position. Azimuth thruster was influential for the ship's position control and bow thruster was influential in heading control. The excellent dynamic positioning performance can be achieved, considering the propulsion power that will have a impact on each situation in the future.


Dynamic positioning system;Loss of propulsion power;Training ship;Performance analysis


  1. Asgeir J. Sorensen. 2011. A survey of dynamic positioning control systems. Annual Reviews in Control 35, 123-136
  2. Jorrit-Jan Serrais. 2009. Time domain analysis for DP simulations. ASME International Conference on Ocean, OMAE Conference, Honolulu
  3. Kim JM, Kim YT and Kim SS. 2008. Indoor localization for mobile robot using extended Kalman Filter. Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems 18(5), 706-711
  4. Kongsberg. 2015. Kongsberg K-Pos DP-11 and cJoy technical manuals, 17-24, 252-254
  5. Lee JY. 2017. Development of a framwork for evaluating time domain performance of a floating offshore structure with dynamic positioning system. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 18(11), 718-724
  6. Samsung Heavy Industries. 2000. Development of ship dynamic positioning system, 6-15
  7. Tannuri EA and Morishita HM. 2006. Experimental and numerical evaluation of a typical dynamic positioning system. Applied Ocean Research 28, 133-146