DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Transition and characteristics of International Conservation Standards for Cultural Heritage - with focus on conservation targets, issues and approach -

문화유산 보존을 위한 국제원칙의 경향과 특성 - 보존대상, 보존쟁점, 보존방식의 변화를 중심으로 -

  • 이화연 (서울대학교 협동과정 도시설계학과) ;
  • 박소현 (서울대학교 건축학과)
  • Received : 2017.06.08
  • Accepted : 2018.01.11
  • Published : 2018.03.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the contents of the cultural heritage conservation standards those have been developed throughout the century to reveal the evolution of the conservation. The analysis targets are prepared principles in response to the risks posed by armed conflicts, improper modifications, risks caused by urban planning and development, and the risk posed by environmental impacts. The study analyzed how conservation targets, issues, and conservation methods have changed. The analysis showed that the results of changed trend of conservation, first, the segmentation and diversification of the conservation targets, second, the integrated approaches, third, risk perception changes due to indirect effects from direct risk factors, forth, changes of conservation from safeguard to sustainable development.

Acknowledgement

Grant : 문화유산 보존을 위한 국제원칙 경향 및 특성에 관한 연구

Supported by : 문화재청

References

  1. Erder, C. (1977). The Venice Charter under Review, Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 3(2), pp.167-190
  2. Menon, K. (1994). Rethinking the Venice Charter: The Indian Experience, South Asian Studies, 10(1), 37-44 https://doi.org/10.1080/02666030.1994.9628475
  3. Phelan, M., Edson, G. & Kimberly, P. (1998). The Law of Cultural Property and Natural Heritage: Protection, Transfer, and Access, Kalos Kapp Press.
  4. Jokilehto, J. (1998). The Context of the Venice Charter(1964), Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 2(4), 229-233 https://doi.org/10.1179/135050398793138762
  5. Jokilehto, J. (1998). International Trends in Historic Preservation: From Ancient Monuments to Living Cultures, The Journal of Preservation Technology, 29(3), 17-19
  6. Robert, P. & Syker, H. (2000). Urban Regeneration, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  7. Harvey, D. (2001). Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7(4) ,319-338 https://doi.org/10.1080/13581650120105534
  8. Petzet, M. (2004). Principles of preservation, an introduction to the International Charters for Conservation and Restoration 40 Years after the Venice charter, Monuments and Sites, ICOMOS
  9. Frigo, M. (2004). Cultural Property vs Cultural Heritage: A "battle of concepts" in international law?, International Review of the Red Cross, 86(854), 367-378 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1560775500180861
  10. Taylor, K. (2004). Cultural Heritage Management: A Possible Role for Charters and Principles in Asia, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 10(5), 417-433 https://doi.org/10.1080/1352725042000299045
  11. Lee, S. (2004). The Principle of Preserving Original Form in the Context of Changing Perspectives of Contemporary Conservation Theory, The Kyong ju mun hwa youn gu, 6(-), 200-224
  12. Ahma, Y. (2006). The Scope and Definitions of Heritage: From Tangible to Intangible, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(3), 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250600604639
  13. Sabbioni, C., Cassar, M. & Brimblecombe, P. (2006). Global climate change impact on built heritage and cultural landscapes, Heritage Weathering and Conservation, 1 & 2, pp. 395-401
  14. Hong, S. & Kim, K. (2008). A Study on the Conservation and Regeneration of Modern Cultural Heritage in Busan Region, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 10(3), 35-47
  15. Jeong, S. (2009). A Study on the Area-based Conservation System for Historic and Cultural Environments, Journal of Urban Design Institute of Korea, 10(4), 233-248
  16. Steele, E. (2009). Cultural Heritage Policy Document, Conservation Institute of Getty Center, http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/research_resources/charters.html
  17. Hardy, M. (2009). The Venice Charter Revisited: modernism conservation and tradition in the 21st century, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  18. Choi, J. & Park, S. (2009). A Study on Problems of the Reconstruction of Heungnyemun and Repair of Geunjeongjeon in Gyeongbok Palace through ICOMOS Documents, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 25(3), 139-151
  19. Cultural Heritage Administration. (2010). Study on the transition of Heritage Conservation in the international conservation standards
  20. Vecco, M. (2010). A definition of cultural heritage: from tangible to Intangible, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(3), 321-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006
  21. Rao, K. (2010). A New Paradigm for the Identification, Nomination and Inscription of Properties on the World Heritage List, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(3), 161-172 https://doi.org/10.1080/13527251003620594
  22. ICOMOS-KOREA. (2010). ICOMOS Charter Statement Collection
  23. Jang, Y. (2011). Case Study on Korean Architecture of Conservation Works based on the International Principles for the Conservation (Masters Dissertation), Myongji Univ.
  24. Lim, Y., Ahn, K. & Park, S. (2011). Expansion of the Historic-cultural Landscape Concept and Evolution of the Urban Planning Control on the Historic Conservation, as demonstrated in the Urban Planning History of Paris, Journal of Urban Design Institute of Korea, 12(6), 43-60
  25. Cultural Heritage Administration. (2011). Study on Establishing Conservation Standards for Korean Heritage (1) study of foundation composition
  26. Cultural Heritage Administration. (2012). Study on Establishing Conservation Standards for Korean Heritage(2) A Study on Rational Ordering System of Domestic Conservation Terms
  27. Choi, B. (2012). Reconsideration of the Athens Charter(1931), Journal of Architectural History, 21(4), 25-36 https://doi.org/10.7738/JAH.2012.21.4.025
  28. Korean National Commission for UNESCO. (2012). Study on Associative Values of Tangible and Intangible Heritage under the World Heritage Convention -. Focus on the OUV Criterion(vi) for World Heritage Nomination
  29. Cultural Heritage Administration. (2013). Study on Establishing Conservation Standards for Korean Heritage (3) Establishment of composition system and basic drafting study
  30. Sweet, J. (2013). Cultural heritage and development in South East Asia. In Clarke, Matthew (ed), Handbook of research on development and religion, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, England, pp.338-355.
  31. Elnokaly, A. & Elseragy, A. (2013). Sustainable heritage development: learning from urban conservation of heritage projects in nonwestern contexts, European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(1)
  32. Lenon, J. (2014). The Venice Charter down under: Its legacy in landscape preservation, Change Over Time, 4(2), 322-336 https://doi.org/10.1353/cot.2014.0015
  33. Rico, T. (2014). The limits of a 'heritage at risk' framework: The construction of post-disaster cultural heritage in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, Journal of Social Archaeology, 14(2)
  34. Chae, H. & Park, S. (2015). Exploring 'Historic Urban Landscape' as a New Approach to Heritage Conservation, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 31(2), 253-260 https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2015.31.2.253
  35. Toman, J. (2017). Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, Routeledge
  36. ICOMOS: http://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts
  37. UNESCO: http://en.unesco.org
  38. World of Heritage Cities: https://www.ovpm.org/
  39. Council of Europe: www.coe.int