Young Men's Choice of Fashion as a Career Path: "Seekers" and "Settlers"

초록

This study explored men's choice of fashion as a college major and, subsequently, a non-traditional career path. Such investigation is important to gain a better understanding of the motives and processes of selecting a non-traditional college major and subsequent career path. This research consulted several theoretical frameworks to guide the development of research questions and help interpret the findings of the study. Specifically, our study builds upon Holland's trait theory (1982), Gottfredson's (1981) circumscription theory, Farmer's (1985) model of career motivation, and Simpson's (2005) typology of men's non-traditional career entry. A qualitative method was used to explore men's experiences of selecting fashion as an academic major in college and deciding to pursue a career in the traditionally female-dominated field. Following the analysis of 22 individual interviews with male upperclassmen majoring in fashion, three topical areas emerged and we proposed a model of male students' path to a non-traditional college major. The model explains male students' dynamics of entering a non-traditional college major, the role of personal and social factors in the decision process as well as the role of future career orientation when choosing to study fashion as an academic major.

키워드

• career choice;
• career orientation;
• non-traditional college major;

파일

원문 PDF 다운로드

참고문헌

1. Bix, A. S. (2002). Equipped for life: Gendered technical training and consumerism in home economics, 1920-1980. Technology and Culture, 43(4), 728-754. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2002.0152
2. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). Labour force statistics from the current population survey. Retrieved May 8, 2018 from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm
3. Buschol, C., Kappler, C., Frei, A. and Berweger, S. (2014). I want to be a scientist/a teacher: Students' perceptions of career decision-making in gender-typed, non-traditional areas of work. Gender and Education, 26(7), 743-758. doi:10.1080/09540253.2014.970615 https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2014.970615
4. Denzim, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. New York, NY: Sage.
5. Equal Opportunities Commission (2003). Facts about men and women in Great Britain. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.
6. Farmer, H. (1985). Model of career and achievement motivation for women and men. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 32, 363-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.32.3.363
7. Galbraith, M. (1992). Understanding career choices of men in elementary education. Journal of Educational Research, 85(4), 246-253. doi:10.1080/00220671.1992.9941123 https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941123
8. Gottfredson, L. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: a developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 28, 545-79. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.545 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.545
9. Hayes, R. (1986). Men's decisions to enter or avoid non-traditional occupations. The Career Development Quarterly, 35(2), 89-101. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.1986.tb00769.x https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1986.tb00769.x
10. Hodges, N., & Karpova, E. (2009). Making a major decision: An exploration of why students enrol in fashion programmes. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 2(2-3), 47-57. doi:10.1080/17543260903183596 https://doi.org/10.1080/17543260903183596
11. Holland, J. (1982). The SDS helps both females and males: A comment. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 30(3), 195-7. doi:10.1002/j.2164-585X.1982.tb00524.x https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-585X.1982.tb00524.x
12. Jacobs, J. A. (1989). Long-term trends in occupational segregation by sex. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 160-173. doi: 10.1086/229217. https://doi.org/10.1086/229217
13. Jacobs, J. A. (2003). Detours on the road to equality: Women, work and higher education. Contexts, 2(1), 32-41. doi:10.1525/ctx.2003.2.1.32 https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2003.2.1.32
14. Karpova, E., Garrin, A., & Lee, J. (2015). Being a minority: Experiences of male students in an apparel program. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 33(4), 297-313. doi:10.1177/0887302X15587755 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X15587755
15. Mastekaasa, A., & Smeby, J. (2008). Educational choice and persistence in male- and female-dominated fields. Higher Education, 55(2), 189-202. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9042-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9042-4
16. McCraken, G. (1988). The long inter-view. Newbury, CA: Sage Publications
17. McDowell, J. (2015). Masculinity and non-traditional occupations: men's talk in women's work. Gender, Work & Organization, 22(3), 273-291. doi:10.1111/gwao.12078 https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12078
18. Nelson, H. N., & Karpova, E. (2009). Women and higher education in Russia: preparation for careers in the apparel industry. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 27(2), 124-142. doi:10.1177/0887302X07309121 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X07309121
19. Simpson, R. (2005). Men in non-traditional occupations: Career entry, career orientation, and experience of role strain. Gender, Work, & Organization, 12(4), 363-380. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00278.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00278.x
20. Smith, L. (1993). A follow up study of the Bachelor of Nursing graduates 1982-1990, University of Glasgow, Scotland. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 1840-8. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18111840.x https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18111840.x
21. Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1086/209413
22. Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the "female" professions. Social Problems, 39(3), 253-267. doi:10.2307/3096961 https://doi.org/10.2307/3096961
23. Williams, L., & Villemez, W. (1993). Seekers and finders: male entry and exit in female dominated jobs. In C. Williams (Ed.) Doing women's work: Men in non-traditional occupations (pp. 64-90). London: Sage.