DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influence of Corporate Knowledge Management System on Learning Orientation

기업의 지식경영시스템이 학습지향성에 미치는 영향

  • Choi, Seung-Il (Dept. of International Trade, Changwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Il (Dept. of Business Administration, Pusan National University)
  • 최승일 (창원대학교 국제무역학과) ;
  • 김동일 (부산대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2018.09.06
  • Accepted : 2018.11.20
  • Published : 2018.11.28

Abstract

In order to survive the competition, companies are developing new knowledge, applying and communicating, and accumulating numerous knowledge management activities. Therefore, it is important to establish and operate an effective knowledge management system to introduce and utilize effective knowledge management. So, the purpose of this study is to confirm the relation between the learning orientation of the organization and the knowledge management which are the main results in the knowledge management. In other words, this study investigated how the knowledge management system of a company affects the learning orientation of the corporate members, so as to be a basis for establishing the direction of knowledge management in the future. This study synthesized theory and previous studies, developed hypotheses and research models, and conducted empirical analysis through questionnaire surveys. This study is analyzed that knowledge management system has a positive effect on learning growth will. In addition, it was confirmed that the knowledge management system has a statistically significant relationship with the intention of internal improvement. Therefore, for the successful operation and management of the support management system, maintenance of the system that can focus on the strategic and appropriate learning model of the organization and the role of the organization member is an important variable. The results of this study are expected to provide meaningful guidance not only in the practical field but also in the study of the organization's knowledge management system.

Keywords

Knowledge Management;Knowledge Management System;Learning Orientation;Competition;Future Orientation

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research Model

Table 1. Analysis of Basis

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Factor, Reliability analysis of Entrepreneurship

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Factor, Reliability analysis of study directivity

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Factor, Reliability analysis of study directivity

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Verification of Hypothesis 1

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Verification of Hypothesis 2

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_231_t0006.png 이미지

References

  1. C. H. Kim & S. W. Byun. (2002). A Study on Prerequisite Factors of Knowledge Management and Mediating Effects on the Organizational Behavior. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 5, 217-235.
  2. P. H. Gray. (2000). The Effects of Knowledge Management System on Emergent Teams : Towards a Research Model. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00040-8
  3. W. E. Baker & J. M. Sinkula. (1999). Learning Orientation, Market Orientation, and Innovation; Integration and Extending Model of Organizational Performance. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 4, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009830402395
  4. H. Sujan, B. A. Weitz & N. Kumar. (1994). Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800303
  5. C. S. Dweck & E. L. Leggett. (1989). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
  6. R. L. Ruggles. (1997). Tools for Knowledge Management: Introduction, in Knowledge Management Tools, Butterworth-Heiemann, Newton: MA, 1-8.
  7. E. S. Jung. (2000). Knowledge Management Strategy in R & D: Case Study of R & D Activities in Heavy Industry, KAIST Master Thesis.
  8. S. G. Kim. (2014). Study on the effect of knowledge management success factors impact on the knowledge management activities of R&D center, Sungkyunkwan University Master of business Administration.
  9. S. F. Slater & J. C. Narver. (1995). Market Orientation and the Learning Organization, Journal of Marketing, 59(Jul), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299505900106
  10. Y. Zhao, Y. Li, S. H. Li & L. B. Chen. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Organizational Learning and Performance: Evidence from China, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1042-2587.
  11. G. T. Lumpkin & G. G. Dess. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
  12. D. J. Shin & D. Y. Cho. (2017). The Moderating Effect of Critically Reflective Work Behavior on Relationship between Learning Orientation and Innovative Behavior in A Company. Korea HRD Review, 12(2), 165-190.
  13. S. G. Song. (2017). Relationship between Technology Innovation Capability, R&D Knowledge Management and Technological Innovation Performance. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 30(3), 1905-1925.
  14. J. M. Chou & S. H. Bae. (2017). The Usage Patterns of MCSs, and the Activation of Knowledge Management Processes for Corporate Innovations: Innovation Openness. Korean Management Science Review, 9(34), 43-60.
  15. C. W. Park. (2016). A Study on the Effect of Entrepreneurship and Self-Efficacy on Knowledge Management : Focusing on Female CEO. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(11), 11-26.