DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SNA 분석을 활용한 항만배후지 연구동향 분석에 관한 연구

Research Trends Analysis on Port Hinterland Using SNA Method

  • 송시성 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원) ;
  • 완준협 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원) ;
  • 박성훈 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원) ;
  • 여기태 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원)
  • Song, Shi-cheng (Graduate school of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • Nguyen, Tuan-hiep (Graduate school of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • Park, Sung-hoon (Graduate school of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • Yeo, Gi-Tae (Graduate school of Logistics, Incheon National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.20
  • 심사 : 2018.11.20
  • 발행 : 2018.11.28

초록

본 연구는 1990년부터 2018년까지 기간 동안의 항만배후지에 대한 연구동향을 사회네트워크 방법론을 이용하여 분석하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 연구에 사용된 자료는 전 세계 116개 관련 학술논문 자료에서 추출하였다. 10년 단위로 분석된 연구결과를 살펴보면, 먼저 1990-1999년 사이에는 컨테이너화, 수송 기반시설 및 선진물류 국가에 관련된 이탈리아, 독일, 캐나다 등이 분석지표상 상위에 위치하였다. 2000-2009년 사이에는 지역화, 경쟁력, 아시아국가 화물유치 및 물류기술 등이 중심적인 위치를 점하였다. 마지막으로 2010-2018년 사이에는 복합운송, 내륙거점, 컨테이너 및 관련 키워드, 해운 및 연관 키워드가 중요하게 연구되었다. 항만배후지 연구동향은 시대가 변화함에 따라 체계화되고 통합적으로 진행되었음을 확인할 수 있으며. 본 연구결과는 항만배후지와 관련된 학계와 산업계의 산업발전에 대한 이해도 및 연구 집중도에 대한 시사점을 제공한다.

키워드

항만;배후지;사회네트워크분석;연구 동향분석;연구 키워드

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_17_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research Flow

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_17_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Result of visualizing keywords in 1990-1999

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_17_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Result of visualizing keywords in 2000-2009

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_17_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Result of visualizing keywords in 2010-2018

Table 1. Normalized data of 3 centrality (1990-1999)

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_17_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Normalized data of 3 centrality 2000-2009

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_17_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Normalized data of 3 centrality 2010-2018

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_17_t0003.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. X. Shi & H. Li. (2016). Developing the port hinterland: Different perspectives and their application to Shenzhen Port, China. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 19, 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.05.004
  2. Ming-Jun, J. &Yan-Ling, C. (2012). Optimization for hub-and-spoke port logistics network of dynamic hinterland. Physics Procedia, 33, 827-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.141
  3. G. Blauwens. & E. Van de Voorde. (1988). The valuation of time savings in commodity transport. International Journal of Transport Economics/Rivista internazionale di economia dei trasporti, 77-87.
  4. T. Notteboom. (2008). The relationship between seaports and the inter-modal hinterland in light of global supply chains.
  5. C. Ferrari, F. Parola & E. Gattorna. (2011). Measuring the quality of port hinterland accessibility: The Ligurian case. Transport Policy, 18(2), 382-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.11.002
  6. H. E. Haralambides. (2002). Competition, excess capacity, and the pricing of port infrastructure. International journal of maritime economics, 4(4), 323-347. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ijme.9100053
  7. T. Kramberger, B. Rupnik, G. Strubelj & K. Prah. (2015). Port Hinterland modelling based on port choice. PROMET-Traffic&Transportation, 27(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v27i3.1611
  8. O. Merk & T. Notteboom. (2015). Port hinterland connectivity. International Transport Forum Discussion Paper.
  9. V. Roso. (2008). Factors influencing implementation of a dry port. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(10), 782-798. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810926493
  10. G. Giuliano & T. O'Brien. (2008). Extended gate operations at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach: a preliminary assessment. Maritime Policy & Management, 35(2), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830801956854
  11. J. Monios & B. Lambert. (2013). Intermodal freight corridor development in the United States. Dry Ports-A Global Perspective, Challenges and Developments in Serving Hinterlands, 197-218.
  12. W. Y. Yap, J. S. Lam & T. Notteboom. (2006). Developments in container port competition in East Asia. Transport Reviews, 26(2), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640500271117
  13. T. E. Notteboom & J. P. Rodrigue. (2005). Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy &Management, 32(3), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830500139885
  14. H. A. Van Klink & G. C. van Den Berg. (1998). Gateways and intermodalism. Journal of transport geography, 6(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(97)00035-5
  15. R. Robinson. (2002). Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(3), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830210132623
  16. F. Iannone. (2012). The private and social cost efficiency of port hinterland container distribution through a regional logistics system. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(9), 1424-1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.019
  17. R. A. Halim, J. H. Kwakkel & L. A. Tavasszy. (2016). A strategic model of port-hinterland freight distribution networks. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 95, 368-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.05.014
  18. R. A. Halim, J. H. Kwakkel & L. A. Tavasszy. (2016). A scenario discovery study of the impact of uncertainties in the global container transport system on European ports. Futures, 81, 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.09.004
  19. T. Y. Tan. (2007). Port cities and hinterlands: A comparative study of Singapore and Calcutta. Political Geography, 26(7), 851-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.06.008
  20. A. Woodburn. (2013). Effects of rail network enhancement on port hinterland container activity: a United Kingdom case study. Journal of Transport Geography, 33, 162-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.10.010
  21. V. Roso., J. Woxenius & K. Lumsden. (2009). The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(5), 338-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.008
  22. G. Wilmsmeier, J. Monios & B. Lambert. (2011). The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1379-1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.010
  23. J. P. Rodrigue & T. Notteboom. (2012). Dry ports in European and North American intermodal rail systems: Two of a kind?. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 5, 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.10.003
  24. J. S. L. Lam & Y. Gu. (2013). Port hinterland intermodal container flow optimisation with green concerns: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 5(3), 257-281. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2013.054190
  25. J. A. Barnes. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human relations, 7(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700102
  26. L. C. Freeman. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  27. C. S. Wang, I. H. Ting & Y. C. Li. (2011, July). Taiwan academic network discussion via social networks analysis perspective. In Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 2011 International Conference on (pp. 685-689). IEEE.
  28. L. C. Freeman. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  29. M. Glanzer & R. Glaser. (1961). Techniques for the study of group structure and behavior: II. Empirical studies of the effects of structure in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 58(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041302
  30. L. C. Freeman. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 35-41.
  31. Y. Hayuth. (1985). Seaports: the challenge of technological and functional changes. Ocean Yearbook Online, 5(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1163/221160085X00069
  32. M. Barke. (1986). Transport and trade. Oliver & Boyd.
  33. A. J. Sargent. (1938). Seaports & Hinterlands. A. and C. Black.
  34. R. D. Neufville & K. Tsunokawa. (1981). Productivity and returns to scale of container ports. Maritime Policy and Management, 8(2), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088838100000033
  35. Y. Zhang & J. S. L. Lam. (2016). Estimating economic losses of industry clusters due to port disruptions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 91, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.05.017
  36. P. E. Kent & A. Hochstein. (1998). Port reform and privatization in conditions of limited competition: the experience in Colombia, Costa Rica and Nicaragua. Maritime Policy & Management, 25(4), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839800000056
  37. M. R. St-Onge, D. J. Scott & N. Wodicka (2001). Terrane boundaries within Trans-Hudson Orogen (Quebec-Baffin segment), Canada: changing structural and metamorphic character from foreland to hinterland. Precambrian Research, 107(1-2), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(00)00155-8
  38. S. W. Lee, D. W. Song & C. Ducruet. (2008). A tale of Asia's world ports: the spatial evolution in global hub port cities. Geoforum, 39(1), 372-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.07.010
  39. Y. Zhang & J. S. L. Lam. (2016). Estimating economic losses of industry clusters due to port disruptions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 91, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.05.017