DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The social character and cultural capital of curriculum : Focusing on Bourdieu's theories of cultural reproduction

교육과정의 사회적 성격과 문화자본 : Bourdieu의 문화재생산론적 관점을 중심으로

  • Received : 2017.12.13
  • Accepted : 2018.02.20
  • Published : 2018.02.28

Abstract

In this study, we will examine that the social class is reproduced by the school curriculum from the viewpoint of cultural reproduction theory by Pierre Bourdieu. Specially, we will examine the sociality of the curriculum, the social control of cultural capital, and how these make class reproduction possible. In this study, social class is reproduced by the ideological orientation of curriculum. This means that the school curriculum has social character and is closely related to the cultural capital of the ruling class.

Keywords

Curriculum;Social Character;Cultural Capital;Social Control;Bourdieu

References

  1. P. Bourdieu, & J. C. Passeron. (1995). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publication.
  2. H. J. Park & Y. H. Kim. (2010). The Effect of Family's Cultural Capital and Social Capital on the Improvement of Students' English Academic Achievement: A Latent Growth Model Analysis. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education. 20(4). 55-82.
  3. B. B. Baek. & K. K. Kim. (2007). Structural relationships between academic achievement and economic, social, and cul- tural capital. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education. 17(3). 101-129.
  4. Y. H. Kim. (2012). A critical review of empirical researches on cultural capital performed in Korea. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education. 22(4). 51-81.
  5. S. Yu & Y. A. Chung. (2012). The relationship between socio-economic status and academic achievement: mediated effects of cultural capital and perceived teachers' expectancy. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education. 50(4). 1-22.
  6. J. Y. Kim & B. K. Yu. (2015). The effects of parents'' socio-economic status on the levels of children''s occupational aspiration: focusing on the mediation process and interaction effects. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education. 25(2). 23-46.
  7. W. J Kim. (2012). The Trend in Socioeconomic Inequalities in Student Achievement: Focusing on the effects of school policy. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education. 22(3). 49-76.
  8. K. K. Kim. (2005). Educational Gap in Korea and Determinant Factors. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education. 15(3). 1-27.
  9. O. H. Oh. (2008). Searching for causes of educational gap: Beyond school, toward family and society. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education. 18(3). 111-133.
  10. K. M. Lee. (2014). Sociology of Education. Paju: Yangseowon.
  11. S. C. Gang & Y. G. Seong. (1995). Understanding of the new Sociology of Education. Seoul: Wonmisa.
  12. C. G. Kim. (2003). Sociological Understanding of Education. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  13. J. G. Lee. (2003). Introduction to Sociology of Education. Seoul: Dongmun Publication.
  14. C. Jong trans. (1995). La Distinction. Seoul: New Wave Publication.
  15. J. J. Son. (2010). Education and Society; Issues and Explations in the Sociology of Education. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  16. O. K. Oh. (2003). Research and Understan-ding to Sociology of Education. Seoul: Kyoyook-kwahaksa.
  17. N. Elias. (1980). Uber den Prozess der Zivilisation. Frankfurt.
  18. K. S An. (1997). Cultural Capital as Reproduction Factors of Social Inequality. Sociology of Education. 7(1). 113-125.
  19. P. Buchner. (1984). Die Bedeutung kultureller Hegemonie fur den Bildungadel. In: Osterreichsche Zeitschrift fur Soziologie 3.
  20. C. D. Kang. (2014). Understanding of Sociology of Education. Seoul: Hakji Publication.
  21. P. Bourdieu & J. C. Passeron. (1983). Okonomische Kapital. (1984). kuturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In: soziale Welt, Frankfurt.
  22. B. S. Kim. (2002). Sociology of Education Seoul : Hakji Publication.
  23. K. M. Lee. (2009). The Transition of Education and Social Thought. Seoul: Wonmisa.
  24. A. S. Wells & I. Sema. (1997). The Politics of Culture: Understanding local political Resistance to Detracking inracially mixed Schools. In Halsey et al.
  25. J. Beck. (1983). Demokratische Schulreform in der Klassengesellschaft. in: Erziehung in der Klassengesellschaft. Munchen.
  26. J. Eggleston. (1977). The Sociology of the School Curriculum. London: RKP.
  27. J. Anyon. (1979). Ideology and U.S. History Textbooks. Harvard Educational Review. 49. 361-386. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.49.3.v6m47l352g3hp5j6
  28. I. H. Lee & H. Y. Lee. trans. (1995). Education and Society. Seoul: Kyoyook kwahaksa.
  29. B. K. Park & H. Y. Lee. trans.(1986). Michael. W. Apple, Ideology and Curriculum. Seoul: Hangilsa.
  30. S. I. Kim. (2000). Socialogy of Education. Seoul: Kyoyook-kwahaksa.
  31. M. F. D. Young. (1971). Knowledge and Control, London: Collier-Macmillan.
  32. S. Bowles & H. Gintis. (1976). Schooling in Capitalist America : Educational Reform and the Contradictions of economic Life. New York: Basic Books.
  33. M. W. Apple. (1982). Education and Power, Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  34. H. Giroux. (1982). Power and Resistance in the New Sociology of Education: Beyond Theories of Social and Cultural Reproduction, Curriculum Perspectives. 2(3). 1-13.
  35. H. J. Park. trans. (1998) Colin Marsh, Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum. Seoul : Kyoyook-kwahaksa.
  36. K. H. Lee. (1987). Critical Sociology of Education. Paju: Hanul Publication.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Wonkwang University