- Volume 31 Issue 1
DOI QR Code
Supplementing Rhodobacter sphaeroides in the diet of lactating Holstein cows may naturally produce coenzyme Q10-enriched milk
- Bae, Gui-Seck ;
- Choi, Ahreum ;
- Yeo, Joon Mo ;
- Kim, Jong Nam ;
- Song, Jaeyong ;
- Kim, Eun Joong ;
- Chang, Moon Baek
- Received : 2017.02.27
- Accepted : 2017.04.18
- Published : 2018.01.01
Objective: To examine the effects of Rhodobacter sphaeroides (R. sphaeroides) supplementation as a direct-fed microbial (DFM) on rumen fermentation in dairy cows and on coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) transition into milk, an in vitro rumen simulation batch culture and an in vivo dairy cow experiment were conducted. Methods: The characteristics of in vitro ruminal fermentation were investigated using rumen fluids from six cannulated Holstein dairy cows at 2 h post-afternoon feeding. A control treatment was included in the experiments based on a typified total mixed ration (TMR) for lactating dairy cows, which was identical to the one used in the in vivo study, plus R. sphaeroides at 0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.5% TMR dry matter. The in vivo study employed six ruminally cannulated lactating Holstein cows randomly allotted to either the control TMR (C-TMR) treatment or to a diet supplemented with a 0.5% R. sphaeroides culture (S-TMR, dry matter basis) ad libitum. The presence of R. sphaeroides was verified using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) applied to the bacterial samples obtained from the in vivo study. The concentration of CoQ10 in milk and in the supernatant from the in vitro study was determined using high performance liquid chromatography. Results: The results of the in vitro batch culture and DGGE showed that the concentration of CoQ10 significantly increased after 2 h of R. sphaeroides supplementation above 0.1%. When supplemented to the diet of lactating cows at the level of 0.5%, R. sphaeroides did not present any adverse effect on dry matter intake and milk yield. However, the concentration of CoQ10 in milk dramatically increased, with treated cows producing 70.9% more CoQ10 than control cows. Conclusion: The CoQ10 concentration in milk increased via the use of a novel DFM, and R. sphaeroides might be used for producing value-added milk and dairy products in the future.
Rhodobacter sphaeroides;Coenzyme Q10;Dairy Cow;In vitro;Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE)
- Zhang Y, Aberg F, Appelkvist EL, Dallner G, Ernster L. Uptake of dietary coenzyme Q supplement is limited in rats. J Nutr 1995;125:446-53.
- Lester RL, Crane FL. The natural occurrence of coenzyme Q and related compounds. J Biol Chem 1959;234:2169-75.
- Weber C, Bysted A, Holmer G. Coenzyme Q10 in the diet-daily intake and relative bioavailability. Mol Aspects Med 1997;18:251-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-2997(97)00003-4
- Niklowitz P, Menke T, Giffei J, Andler W. Coenzyme Q10 in maternal plasma and milk throughout early lactation. Biofactors 2005;25:67-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.5520250108
- Quiles JL, Ochoa JJ, Ramirez-Tortosa MC, et al. Coenzyme Q concentration and total antioxidant capacity of human milk at different stages of lactation in mothers of preterm and full-term infants. Free Radic Res 2006;40:199-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715760500404805
- Kalen A, Appelkvist EL, Dallner G. Age-related changes in the lipid compositions of rat and human tissues. Lipids 1989;24:579-84.
- Overvad K, Diamant B, Holm L, et al. Coenzyme Q10 in health and disease. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999;53:764-70.
- Choi JH, Ryu YW, Seo JH. Biotechnological production and applications of coenzyme Q10. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2005;68:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-1946-x
- Yoshida H, Kotani Y, Ochiai K, Araki K. Production of ubiquinone-10 using bacteria. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1998;44:19-26. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.44.19
- Yen H-W, Chiu C-H. The influences of aerobic-dark and anaerobiclight cultivation on CoQ10 production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides in the submerged fermenter. Enzyme Microb Technol 2007;41:600-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.05.005
- Van Niel CB. The culture, general physiology, morphology, and classification of the non-sulfur purple and brown bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 1944;8:1-118.
- Harris RF, Sommers LE. Plate-dilution frequency technique for assay of microbial ecology. Appl Microbiol 1968;16:330-4.
- McDougall EI. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochem J 1948;43:99-109. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0430099
- Miller TL, Wolin MJ. A serum bottle modification of the Hungate technique for cultivating obligate anaerobes. Appl Microbiol 1974;27:985-7.
- Chaney AL, Marbach EP. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem 1962;8:130-2.
- Erwin ES, Sterner W, Gordon RS, Machlin LJ, Tureen LL. Etiology of muscular dystrophy in the lamb and chick. J Nutr 1961;75:45-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/75.1.45
- Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951;193:265-75.
- Rius AG, Kittelmann S, Macdonald KA, et al. Nitrogen metabolism and rumen microbial enumeration in lactating cows with divergent residual feed intake fed high-digestibility pasture. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:5024-34. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5392
- Karr EA, Sattley WM, Jung DO, Madigan MT, Achenbach LA. Remarkable diversity of phototrophic purple bacteria in a permanently frozen Antarctic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:4910-4.
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
- Orozco D, Skamarack J, Reins K, et al. Determination of ubidecarenone (coenzyme Q10, ubiquinol-10) in raw materials and dietary supplements by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection: single-laboratory validation. J AOAC Int 2007;90:1227-36.
- Zahiri HS, Yoon SH, Keasling JD, et al. Coenzyme Q10 production in recombinant Escherichia coli strains engineered with a heterologous decaprenyl diphosphate synthase gene and foreign mevalonate pathway. Metab Eng 2006;8:406-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2006.05.002
- Tang PH, Miles MV, Steele P, et al. Determination of coenzyme Q10 in human breast milk by high-performance liquid chromatography. Biomed Chromatogr 2006;20:1336-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.702
- SAS. SAS Procedures Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.; 1999.
- Steel RG, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
- Lila ZA, Mohammed N, Yasui T, et al. Effect of a twin strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation in vitro. J Anim Sci 2004;82:1847-54. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8261847x
- Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ, Chen XB, McIntosh FM. Different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ their effects on ruminal acterial numbers in vitro and in sheep. J Amim Sci 1995;73:1811-18.
- Katayama K, Fujita T. Studies on lymphatic absorption of 1',2'-(3H)-coenzyme Q10 in rats. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 1972;20:2585-92. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.20.2585
- Miles MV. The uptake and distribution of coenzyme Q(10). Mitochondrion 2007;7:S72-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mito.2007.02.012
Supported by : Chung-Ang University Graduate