DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand models of RC high-rise buildings

  • Pejovic, Jelena R. (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Montenegro) ;
  • Serdar, Nina N. (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Montenegro) ;
  • Pejovic, Radenko R. (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Montenegro)
  • Received : 2017.07.22
  • Accepted : 2017.09.09
  • Published : 2017.09.25

Abstract

One of the important phases of probabilistic performance-based methodology is establishing appropriate probabilistic seismic demand models (PSDMs). These demand models relate ground motion intensity measures (IMs) to demand measures (DMs). The objective of this paper is selection of the optimal IMs in probabilistic seismic demand analysis (PSDA) of the RC high-rise buildings. In selection process features such as: efficiency, practically, proficiency and sufficiency are considered. RC high-rise buildings with core wall structural system are selected as a case study building class with the three characteristic heights: 20-storey, 30-storey and 40-storey. In order to determine the most optimal IMs, 720 nonlinear time-history analyses are conducted for 60 ground motion records with a wide range of magnitudes and distances to source, and for various soil types, thus taking into account uncertainties during ground motion selection. The non-linear 3D models of the case study buildings are constructed. A detailed regression analysis and statistical processing of results are performed and appropriate PSDMs for the RC high-rise building are derived. Analyzing a large number of results it are adopted conclusions on the optimality of individual ground motion IMs for the RC high-rise building.

References

  1. Ambraseys, N., Smit, P., Sigbjornsson, R., Suhadolc, P. and Margaris, B. (2002), Internet-site for European strong-motion data, European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Environmental and Climate Programme; Brussels, Belgium. http://www.isesd.cv.ic.ac.uk.
  2. Baker, J.W. and Cornell C.A. (2005), "A vectored-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(10), 1193-1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.474
  3. Bavaghar, Y. and Bayat, M. (2017), "Seismic fragility curves for highly skewed highway bridges", J. Vibroeng., 19(4), 2749-2758. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.18340
  4. Bayat M. and Daneshjoo F. (2015), "Seismic performance of skewed highway bridges using analytical fragility function methodology", Comput. Concr., 16(5), 723-740. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2015.16.5.723
  5. Bayat, M., Daneshjoo, F. and Nistico N. (2015a), "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of multi-span highway bridges", Steel. Compos. Struct., 19(1), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.1.237
  6. Bayat, M., Daneshjoo, F. and Nistico N. (2015b), "A novel proficient and sufficient intensity measure for probabilistic analysis of skewed highway bridges", Struct. Eng. Mech., 55(6), 1177-1202. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.6.1177
  7. Bayat, M., Daneshjoo, F. and Nistico N. (2017), "The effect of different intensity measures and earthquake directions on the seismic assessment of skewed highway bridges", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 16(1), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0375-z
  8. Chopra, A.K. (1995), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, First edition, Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey, USA.
  9. Cordova, P.P., Deierlein, G.G., Mehanny, S.S., and Cornell, C.A. (2001), "Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure", The Second U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Sapporo, Japan.
  10. Cornell, A.C., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R.O. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), "Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines", J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 526-532. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
  11. CTBUH (2011), The Tallest 20 in 2020: Entering the Era of the Megatall; The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, USA.
  12. EN1992-1-1 (2004), Design of Concrete Structures. Part 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  13. EN1998-1 (2004), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  14. EN1998-3 (2005), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  15. ETABS (2013), ETABS 2013 Integrated Analysis, Design and Drafting of Buildings Systems, CSI Computers & Structures Inc., Berkeley, USA.
  16. Giardini, D., Woessner, J., Danciu, L., Crowley, H., Cotton, F., Grunthal, G., Pinho, R., Valensise, G. and the SHARE consortium (2013), SHARE European Seismic Hazard Map, European Commission. http://www.share-eu.org.
  17. Giovenale, P., Cornell, A.C. and Esteva, L. (2004), "Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33(8), 951-979. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.386
  18. Guan, M., Du, H., Cui, J., Zeng, Q. and Jiang H. (2015), "Optimal ground motion intensity measure for long-period structures", Meas. Sci. Technol., 26(10), 1-12.
  19. HAZUS MR4 (2003), Technical manual, Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology - Earthquake Model, National Institute of Building Sciences, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Ishington DC.
  20. Housner, G.W. (1952), "Spectrum intensities of strong motion earthquakes", Proceedings of Symposium on Earthquake and Blast Effects on Structures, EERI. http://www.ctbuh.org/TallBuildings/HeightStatistics/BuildingsinNumbers/TheTallest20in2020/tabid/2926/language/en-US/Default.aspx
  21. Ji, J., Elnashai, A.S and Kuchma, D.A. (2009), "Seismic fragility relationships for reinforced concrete high-rise buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 18(3), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.408
  22. Ji, J., Elnashai, A.S. and Kuchma, D.A. (2007), "Seismic fragility assessment for reinforced concrete high-rise buildings", Research Report No. 07-14; Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  23. Kostinakis, K.G. and Athanatopoulou A.M. (2015), "Evaluation of scalar structure-specific ground motion intensity measures for seismic response prediction of earthquake resistant 3D buildings", Earthq. Struct., 9(5), 1091-1114. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.5.1091
  24. Lu, X., Lu, X.Z. and Ye, L.P. (2012), "Discussion on the ground motion intensity measures for super high-rise buildings", China Civil. Eng. J., 45(1), 292-296.
  25. Lu, X., Ye, L.P., Lu, X.Z., MengKe, L.I. and XiaoWei M.A. (2013), "An improved ground motion intensity measure for super high-rise buildings", Sci. China Tech. Sci., 56(6), 1525-1533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5234-1
  26. Luco, N. and Cornell, C.A. (2007), "Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake motions", Earthq. Spectra, 23(2), 357-391. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2723158
  27. Mackie, K. and Stojadinovic, B. (2001), "Probabilistic seismic demand model for California bridges", J. Bridge Eng., 6(6), 468-480. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(468)
  28. Martinez-Rueda, J.E. (1998), "Scaling procedure for natural accelerograms based on a system of spectrum intensity scales", Earthq. Spectra, 14(1), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585992
  29. Matsumura, K. (1992), "On the intensity measure of string motions related to structural failures", Proceedings of the 10WCEE, Madrid, July.
  30. Mosalem, K.M., Ayala, G., White, R.N. and Roth, C. (1997), "Seismic fragility of LRC frames with and without masonry infill walls", J. Earthq. Eng., 1(4), 693-719. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469708962384
  31. Nagashree, B.K., Kumar R.C.M. and Reddy V.D. (2016), "A parametric study on seismic fragility analysis of RC buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 10(3), 629-643.
  32. Padgett, J.E., Nielson, B.G. and DesRoches, R. (2008), "Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(5), 711-726. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.782
  33. PEER (2010), Technical Report for the PEER Ground Motion Database Web Application, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
  34. PEER TBI (2014), Tall Buildings Initiative; Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. http://peer.berkeley.edu/tbi/
  35. Pejovic, J. and Jankovic, S. (2015), "Dependence of RC high-rise buildings response on the earthquake intensity", J. Croatian Assoc. Civil Eng., 67(8), 749-759.
  36. Pejovic, J.R. (2016), "Seismic analysis of reinforced concrete high-rise building", Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Civil Engineering Podgorica, University of Montenegro, Podgorica.
  37. PERFORM (2006), PERFORM 3D Nonlinear Analysis and Performance Assessment for 3D Structures, CSI Computers & Structures Inc., Berkeley, USA.
  38. Powell, G.H. (2007), PERFORM 3D Detailed example of a tall shear wall building - Nonlinear Modeling, Analysis and Performance Assessment for Earthquake Loads, Computers & Structures Inc, Berkeley, USA.
  39. Rossetto, T. and Elnashai, A. (2003), "Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data", Eng. Struct., 25(10), 1241-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9
  40. Shome, N. (1999), "Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear structures", Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford.
  41. Shome, N., Cornell, C.A., Bazzurro, P. and Carballo, J.E. (1998) "Earthquakes, records and nonlinear responses", Earthq. Spectra, 14(3), 469-500. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586011
  42. Singhal, A. and Kiremidjian, A.S., (1997), "A Method for Earthquake Motion-Damage Relationships with Application to Reinforced Concrete Frames", NCEER-97-0008; National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo.
  43. Stewart, J.P., Chiou, S.J., Bray, J.D., Graves, R.W., Somerville, P.G. and Abrahamson, N.A. (2002) "Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 22(9), 765-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00097-0
  44. Su, N., Lu, X., Zhou, Y. and Yang, T.Y. (2017) "Estimating the peak structural response of high-rise structures using spectral value-based intensity measures", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 26(8), 1-8.
  45. Taranath, B.S. (2010), Reinforced Concrete Design of Tall Buildings, International Code Council, Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, USA.
  46. Tothong, P. and Luco, N. (2007), "Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced intensity measures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13),1837-1860. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.696
  47. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  48. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2005), "Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(13), 1573-1600. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.496
  49. Ye, L.P., Ma, Q.L., Miao, Z., Guan, H. and Zhuge, Y. (2011), "Numerical and comparative study of earthquake intensity indices in seismic analysis", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 22(4), 362-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.693
  50. Zhang, Y., He, Z., Lu, W. and Yang, Y. (2017), "A spectral-acceleration-based linear combination-type earthquake intensity measure for high-rise buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1286624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1286624

Cited by

  1. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of steel moment frames by utilising Bayesian statistics pp.2116-7214, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2018.1538905