Effects of two litter amendments on air NH3 levels in broiler closed-houses

  • Atapattu, N.S.B.M (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna) ;
  • Lakmal, L.G.E. (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna) ;
  • Perera, P.W.A. (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.01
  • 심사 : 2017.03.19
  • 발행 : 2017.10.01


Objective: High $NH_3$ emissions from poultry houses are reported to have negative impacts on health, welfare and safety of birds and humans, and on the environment. Objective of the present study was to determine the effects of two litter amendments on the $NH_3$ levels in broiler closed houses under hot-humid conditions. Methods: Giving a completely randomize design, nine closed houses, each housed 32,500 birds on paddy husk litter, were randomly allocated into two treatment (Mizuho; a bacterial culture mix and Rydall OE; an enzymatic biocatalyst) and control groups. $NH_3$ levels were determined thrice a day (0600, 1200, and 1800 h), at three heights from the litter surface (30, 90, and 150 cm), at 20 predetermined locations of a house, from day 1 to 41. Results: Rydall significantly reduced the $NH_3$ level compared to control and Mizuho. $NH_3$ levels at 30 cm were significantly higher than that of 90 and 150 cm. The $NH_3$ levels at 30 cm height were higher than 25 ppm level from day 9, 11, and 13 in Mizuho, control, and Rydall groups, respectively to day 41. $NH_3$ levels at 150 cm height were higher than maximum threshold limit of 50 ppm for human exposure from day 12, 14, and 15 in Mizuho, control, and Rydall groups, respectively to day 33. Being significantly different among each other, the $NH_3$ level was highest and lowest at 0600 and 1800 h. Litter amendments had no significant effects on growth performance. Rydall significantly increased the litter N content on day 24. Conclusion: It was concluded that the $NH_3$ levels of closed house broiler production facilities under tropical condition are so high that both birds and workers are exposed to above recommended levels during many days of the growing period. Compared to microbial culture, the enzymatic biocatalyst was found to be more effective in reducing $NH_3$ level.


  1. Fowler D, O'donoghue M, Muller JBA et al. A chronology of nitrogen deposition in the UK between 1900 and 2000. Water Air Soil Pollt Focus 2005;4:9-23.
  2. Ritz CW, Fairchild BD, Lacy MP. Implications of NH3 production and emissions from commercial poultry facilities: A review. J Appl Poult Res 2004;13:684-92.
  3. Asman WA, Sutton MA, Schjorring JK. Ammonia: emission, atmospheric transport and deposition. New phytol 1998;139:27-48.
  4. Wei FX, Hu XF, Xu B, et al. 2015. Ammonia concentration and relative humidity in poultry houses affect the immune response of broilers. Genet Mol Res 2015;14:3160-9.
  5. Miles DM, Miller WW, Branton SL, Maslin WR, Lott BD. Ocular responses to NH3 in broiler chickens. Avian Dis 2006;50:45-9.
  6. Jones EK, Wathes CM, Webster AJF. Avoidance of atmospheric NH3 by domestic fowl and the effect of early experience. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005;90:293-308.
  7. Yahav S. 2005 Ammonia affects performance and thermoregulation of male broiler chickens. Anim Res 2005;3:289-93.
  8. Miles DM, Branton SL, Lott BD. Atmospheric $NH_3$ is detrimental to the performance of modern commercial broilers. Poult Sci 2004; 83:1650-4.
  9. Beker A, Vanhooser SL, Swartzlander JH, Teeter RG. Atmospheric $NH_3$ concentration effects on broiler growth and performance. J Appl Poult Res 2004;13:5-9.
  10. Moore PA, Daniel TV, Edwards DR. Reducing phosphorus runoff and improving poultry production with alum. Poult Sci 1999;78:692-698.
  11. Singh A, Casey KD, King WD, et al. Efficacy of urease inhibitor to reduce $NH_3$ emission from poultry houses. J Appl Poult Res 2009;18: 34-42.
  12. Coufal CD, Chavez C, Niemeyer PR, Carey JB. Nitrogen emissions from broilers measured by mass balance over eighteen consecutive flocks. Poult Sci 2006;85:384-91.
  13. Moore PA, Huff WE, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Sauer TC. Effect of aluminum sulfate on NH3 fluxes from poultry litter in commercial broiler houses. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium. on Livestock Environ. 2009 May 29-30 1997; Bloomington, UK. American Society of Agricultural Engineering; 1997. pp. 883-91.
  14. Weaver WD, Meijerhof R. The effect of different levels of relative humidity and air movement on litter conditions, $NH_{3}$ levels, growth, and carcass quality for broiler chickens. Poult Sci 199;70:746-55.
  15. Redwine JS, Lacey RE, Mukhtar S, Carey JB. Concentration and emissions of ammonia and particulate matter in tunnel–ventilated broiler houses under summer conditions in Texas. Trans ASAE 2002;45:1101.
  16. Kay RM, Lee PA. Ammonia emission from pig buildings and characteristics of slurry produced by pigs offered low crude protein diets. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on $NH_3$ and Odour Control from Animal Production Facilities. Vinkeloord, The Netherlands: 1997. p. 253-260.
  17. Robertson AP, Hoxey RP, Demmers TGM et al. Commercial studies of the effect of broiler protein intake on aerial pollutant emissions. Biosyst Eng 2002;82:217-25.
  18. Karunakaran D. Microbial Additives to Reduce $NH_3$ Emission from Poultry Houses Proceedings of the National Conference on Mitigating Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations: Exploring the Advantages, Limitations, and Economics of Mitigation Technologies. 2008 May 19-21; Des Moines, USA.
  19. De Laune PB, Moore PA, Daniel TC, Lemunyon JL. Effect of chemical and microbial amendments on $NH_{3}$ volatilization from composting poultry litter. J Environ Qual 2004;33:728-34.
  20. Seedorf J, Hartung J. Survey of ammonia concentrations in livestock buildings. J Agric Sci 1999;133:433-7.
  21. Atapattu NSBM, Senaratna D, Belpagodagamage UD. Comparison of ammonia emission rates from three types of broiler litters. Poult Sci 2008;87:2436-40.
  22. Moore PA, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Miller DM. Evaluation of chemical amendments to reduce NH3volatilization from poultry litter. Poult Sci 1996;75:315-20.
  23. Pope MJ, Cherry TE. An evaluation of the presence of pathogens on broilers raised on poultry litter treatment-treated litter. Poult Sci 2000;79:1351-5.
  24. Carlile FS. Ammonia in poultry houses: A literature review. Worlds Poult Sci J 1984;40:99-113.
  25. Wathes CM, Jones JB, Kristensen HH, Jones EKM, Webster AJF. Aversion of pigs and domestic fowl to atmospheric ammonia. Trans ASAE 2002;45:1605.
  26. Lahav O, Mor T, Hebe AJ et al. A new approach for minimizing NH3 emissions from poultry houses. Water Air Soil Pollt 2008;191:183-97.
  27. Wijewardene K, Mohideen MR, Mendis S, et al. Prevalence of hypertension, diabetes and obesity: baseline findings of a population based survey in four provinces in Sri Lanka. Ceylon Med J 2005;50:62-70.
  28. Zhu J, Jacobson L, Schmidt D, Nicolai R. Daily variations in odor and gas emissions from animal facilities. Appl Eng Agric 2000;16:153.
  29. Reece FN, Bates BJ, Lott BD. $NH_3$ control in broiler houses. Poult Sci 1979;58:754-5.
  30. Xin H, Berry IL, Tabler GT. Minimum ventilation requirement and associated energy cost for aerial $NH_3$ control in broiler houses. Trans ASAE 1996;39:645-8.
  31. Carr LE, Nicholson JL. Broiler response to three ventilation rates. Trans ASAE 1980;23:414-8.

피인용 문헌

  1. Effectiveness of poultry litter amendments on bacterial survival and Eimeria oocyst sporulation pp.09728988, 2018,