Emergy Evaluation of Korean Agriculture

한국 농업의 에머지 평가

  • Kang, Daeseok (Department of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University)
  • 강대석 (부경대학교 생태공학과)
  • Received : 2017.08.15
  • Accepted : 2017.08.28
  • Published : 2017.09.30


Emergy methodology was used to analyze the biophysical basis of Korean agriculture and assess its sustainablility. Total yearly emergy input into Korean agriculture was $7.72{\times}10^{22}sej/yr$ in 2013. Purchased inputs were the dominant emergy source, accounting for 90.1% ($6.95{\times}10^{22}sej/yr$) of the annual input. This clearly indicates that the Korean agriculture is a modern, industrialized system that depends mostly on market goods and services derived from nonrenewable resources. The monetary equivalent of the total emergy input was 18.9 trillion \/yr, 1.5 times greater than the total production cost from farm expense surveys. Emergy return on investment of Korean agriculture was low, with an emergy yield ratio of 1.11. Korean agriculture appears to exert pressure on the environment as revealed by the high environmental loading ratio of 9.30. With very low emergy input from renewable sources (9.7%) and high environmental pressure, Korean agriculture is not sustainable, with an emergy sustainability index of 0.12. This study suggests that higher use efficiency of and lower dependence on nonrenewable purchased inputs need to be prioritized in an effort to enhance the sustainability of Korean agriculture.


Supported by : 부경대학교


  1. Brandt-Williams, S. L., 2001, Folio #4: Emergy of Florida agriculture, Handbook of emergy evaluation, Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
  2. Brown, M. T., Arding, J., 1991, Transformities working paper, Center for Wetlands, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
  3. Brown, M. T., Protano, G., Ulgiati, S., 2011, Assessing geobiosphere work of generating global reserves of coal, crude oil, and natural gas, Ecol. Model., 222, 879-887.
  4. Brown, M. T., Ulgiati, S., 2004, Emergy analysis and environmental accounting, Encyclopedia of Energy 2, 329-354.
  5. Buranakarn, V., 1998, Evaluation of recycling and reuse of building materials using the emergy analysis method, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  6. Campbell, E. T., Brown, M. T., 2012, Environmental accounting of natural capital and ecosystem services for the US national forest system, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 14, 691-724.
  7. Cavalett, O., de Queiroz, J. F., Ortega, E., 2006, Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil, Ecol. Model., 193, 205-224.
  8. Cavalett, O., Ortega, E., 2009, Emergy, nutrients balance, and economic assessment of soybean production and industrialization in Brazil, J. of Clean. Prod., 17, 762-771.
  9. Chen, G. Q., Jiang, M. M., Chen, B., Yang, Z. F., Lin, C., 2006, Emergy analysis of Chinese agriculture, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 115, 161-173.
  10. Cohen, M. J., Sweeney, S., Brown, M. T., 2007, Computing the unit emergy value of crustal elements, in Brown, M. T., Bardi, E., Campbell, D., Comar, V., Haung, S. H., Rydberg, T., Tilley, D., Ulgiati, S. (eds.), Emergy synthesis 4: Theory and applications of the emergy methodology, Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  11. Eum, K. H., Son, J. H., Cho, E. I., Lee, S. M., Park, C. K., 1996, The estimation of carrying capacity in Deukryang Bay by emergy analysis, J. Korean Fish. Soc., 29, 629-636.
  12. Gasparatos, A., 2011, Resource consumption in Japanese agriculture and its link to food security, Energ. Policy, 39, 1101-1112.
  13. Ghisellini, P., Zucaro, A., Viglia, S., Ulgiati, S., 2014, Monitoring and evaluating the sustainability of Italian agricultural system: An Emergy decomposition analysis, Ecol. Model., 271, 132-148.
  14. GIR (Greenhouse Gas Inventory & Research Center), 2015, National greenhouse gas inventory report of Korea, GIR, Seoul.
  15. Hong, C. O., Noh, Y. D., Kim, S. Y., Kim, P. J., 2014, Determining effect of oyster shell on cadmium extractability and mechanism of immobilization in arable soil, Korean J. Environ. Agric., 33, 245-253.
  16. Hong, S., Lee, J., Kang, D., 2015, Emergy evaluation of management measures for derelict fishing gears in Korea, Ocean Sci. J., 50, 603-613.
  17. Jeong, H., Kim, C., Kim, J., 2015, Evaluating the economic value of environmentally sound functions of environment-friendly agriculture, J. Rural Develop., 38, 61-82.
  18. Kang, D., 2001, Emergy evaluation perspective on the natural environment and economy of Seoul, Bull. Korean Env. Sci. Soc., 10(S-1), 1-10.
  19. Kang, D., 2007, Emergy evaluation overview of the natural environment and economy of the Han River basin in Korea, J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Eng., 10, 138-147.
  20. Kang, D., 2013, Emergy-based value of the contributions of the Youngsan River estuary ecosystem to the Korean economy, The Sea, 18, 13-20.
  21. Kang, D., 2015, Emergy evaluation of the Korean economy and environment: Implications for the valuation of marine ecosystem services, J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Energy, 18, 102-115.
  22. Kang, D., 2016, Emergy evaluation database for Korea, Unpublished Manuscript.
  23. Kang, D., Nam, J., 2003, Emergy-based valuation of marine environmental resources and policy implications, Korea Maritime Institute, Seoul.
  24. Kang, D., Nam, J., Choi, H. W., Son, K., 2015, Spatial valuation map for Gyeonggi Bay in Korea based on emergy methodology, 8th International Ecosystem Services Partnership Conference 2015, 9-13 November, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
  25. Kang, D., Park, S. S., 2002, Emergy evaluation perspective of a multipurpose dam proposal in Korea, J. Environ. Manage., 66, 293-306.
  26. K-eco, 2016, Survey on agricultural wastes, K-eco, Incheon, Korea.
  27. Kim, H. C., Lee, Y., 2007, Heat flow in the Republic of Korea, J. Geophy. Res., 112, B05413.
  28. Kim, W. S., 2002, Development and application of strategic environmental assessment to the tideland reclamation project by the environmental accounting, MS Thesis, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea.
  29. Kim, Y., Jeong, H., Heo, J., 2014, The economic evaluation of the public values of agriculture and rural area in Korea, J. Korean Soc. Rural Plan., 20, 101-112.
  30. KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration), 2014, Annual climatological report, KMA, Seoul.
  31. KREI (Korea Rural Economic Institute), 2016, Agricultural outlook 2016, KREI, Naju, Korea.
  32. KREI, 2017, Agricultural outlook 2017(I), KREI, Naju, Korea.
  33. KSO (Korea Statistical Office), 2014, Korea statistical yearbook, KSO, Daejeon, Korea.
  34. Lee, H., Lee, W. K., Kim, J. G., 2005, Emergy analysis of Korean agriculture, Korean J. Environ. Agric., 24, 169-179.
  35. Lee, K., Yoon, K., Choi, D., Jung, J., Choi, W., Lim, S., 2013, Agricultural soil carbon management considering water environment, J. Environ. Impact Assess., 22, 1-17.
  36. Lee, S. M., Odum, H. T., 1994, Emergy analysis overview of Korea, J. Korean Env. Sci. Soc., 3, 165-175.
  37. Lu, H. F., Campbell, D. E., Li, Z. A., Ren, H., 2006, Emergy synthesis of an agro-forest restoration system in lower subtropical China, Ecol. Eng., 27, 175-192.
  38. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs), 2013, Development plan for agriculture, rural areas and food industry, MAFRA, Sejong, Korea.
  39. MAFRA, 2014, Agriculture, food and rural affairs statistics yearbook, MAFRA, Sejong, Korea.
  40. MAFRA, 2015, Agriculture, food and rural affairs statistics yearbook, MAFRA, Sejong, Korea.
  41. MAFRA, 2016, Agriculture, food and rural affairs statistics yearbook, MAFRA, Sejong, Korea.
  42. Martin, J. F., Diemont, S. A. W., Powell, E., Stanton, M., Levy-Tacher, S., 2006, Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 115, 128-140.
  43. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affaris), 2011, Long-term water management plan (2011-2020), MLTM, Seoul, Korea.
  44. MOTIE (Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy), 2015, Energy consumption survey, MOTIE, Sejong, Korea.
  45. NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Science), 2009, Monitoring project on agri-environment quality in Korea, NAAS, Suwon, Korea.
  46. NAAS, 2011, Food composition table, NAAS, Suwon, Korea.
  47. Nam, J., Chang, W., Kang, D., 2010, Carrying capacity of an uninhabited island off the southwestern coast of Korea, Ecol. Model., 221, 2102-2107.
  48. Nam, J., Kang, D., 2016, Emergy valuation of tidal flat ecosystems in Korea: I. Characteristics of environ-mental emergy inputs, The Sea, 21, 134-143.
  49. NIAST (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology), 2005, Assessment of soil erosion potential in Korea, NIAST, Suwon, Korea.
  50. NIAST, 2007, Assessment of impacts and vulnerability of agriculture to climate change and adaptation strategies, NIAST, Suwon, Korea.
  51. NIE (National Institute of Ecology), 2015, National ecosystem assessment for the sustainable land management, NIE, Seocheon, Korea.
  52. Odum, H. T., 1996, Environmental accounting: Emergy and environmental decision making, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  53. Odum, H. T., 2000, Folio #2: Emergy of global processes, Handbook of emergy evaluation, Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
  54. Odum, H. T., Brown, M. T., Brandt-Williams, S., 2000, Folio #1: Introduction and global budget, Handbook of emergy evaluation, Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  55. Park, Y. S., Egilmez, G., Kucukvar, M., 2016, Emergy and end-point impact assessment of agricultural and food production in the United States: A Supply chain-linked ecologically-based life cycle assessment, Ecol. Indic., 62, 117-137.
  56. RDA (Rural Development Administration), 2014, 2013 Income of agricultural and livestock products, RDA, Jeonju, Korea.
  57. Rydberg, T., Haden, A. C., 2005, Emergy evaluations of Denmark and Danish agriculture: Assessing the influence of changing resource availability on the organization of agriculture and society, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 117, 145-158.
  58. Sagong, J. H., Jung, O. S., Yeo, H. B., 2015, Appraising the worth of ecosystem services of rice-fields in Chungcheongnam-do region, J. Korean Soc. Rural Plan., 21, 1-17.
  59. Ugiati, S., Odum, H. T., Bastianoni, S., 1994, Emergy use, environmental loading and sustainability: An Emergy analysis of Italy, Ecol. Model., 73, 215-268.
  60. Wang, Z., Chen, Y., Sui, P., Gao, W., Qin, F., Zhang, J., Wu, X., 2014, Emergy analysis of grain production systems on large-scale farms in the North China plain based on LCA, Agr. Syst., 128, 66-78.
  61. Yang, D., Lee, E., Lee, J., Kim, M. S., Han, D., Kim, M. H., Cho, K. J., Oh, Y. J., Park, S., 2016, Occurrence patterns of C4 plants in agroecosystems (farming fields) in South Korea, Korean J. Ecol. Environ., 49, 89-101.
  62. Yi, T., Ziang, P., 2016, Emergy analysis of paddy farming in Hunan province, China: A New perspective on sustainable development of agriculture, J. Integr. Agr., 15, 2426-2436.
  63. Zhang, X. H., Zhang, R., Wu, J., Zhang, Y. Z., Lin, L. L., Deng, S. H., Li, L., Yang, G., Yu, X. Y., Qi, H., Peng, H., 2016, An Emergy evaluation of the sustainability of Chinese crop production system during 2000-2010, Ecol. Indic., 60, 622-633.