DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mechanics based force-deformation curve of steel beam to column moment joints

  • Kasar, Arnav A. (Department of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur) ;
  • Bharti, S.D. (Department of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur) ;
  • Shrimali, M.K. (Department of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur) ;
  • Goswami, Rupen (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras)
  • Received : 2017.03.27
  • Accepted : 2017.06.02
  • Published : 2017.09.20

Abstract

The widespread damage to steel Moment Resisting Frames (MRFs) in past major earthquakes have underscored the need to understand the nonlinear inelastic behaviour of such systems. To assess the seismic performance of steel MRF, it is essential to model the nonlinear force-deformation behaviour of beam to column joints. To determine the extent of inelasticity in a beam to column joint, nonlinear finite element analysis is generally carried out, which is computationally involved and demanding. In order to obviate the need of such elaborate analyses, a simplistic method to predict the force-deformation behaviour is required. In this study, a simple, mechanics driven, hand calculation method is proposed to obtain the forcedeformation behaviour of strong axis beam to column moment joints. The force-deformation behaviour for twenty-five interior and exterior beam to column joints, having column to beam strength ratios ranging from 1.2 to 10.99 and 2.4 to 22, respectively, have been obtained. The force-deformation behaviour predicted using the proposed method is compared with the results of finite element analyses. The results show that the proposed method predicts the force-deformation behaviour fairly accurately, with much lesser computational effort. Further the proposed method has been used to conduct Nonlinear Dynamic Time History Analyses of two benchmark frames; close correspondence of results obtained with published results establishes the usefulness and computational accuracy of the method.

References

  1. ABAQUS (2011), ABAQUS 6.11 Analysis User's Manual; Online Documentation Help: Dassault Systemes.
  2. AISC 341-05 (2005), Seismic Provisions for Steel Structural Buildings; AISC 341-05, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
  3. AISC 360-10 (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings; AISC 360-10, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
  4. Castro, J.M., Davila-Arbona, F.J. and Elghazouli, A.Y. (2008), "Seismic design approaches for panel zones in steel moment frames", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(S1), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460801922712
  5. Choi, S.W. and Park, H.S. (2011), "A study on the minimum column-to-beam moment ratio of steel moment resisting frame with various connection models", Proceedings of Structures Congress, ASCE.
  6. Choi, S.W. and Park, H.S. (2012), "Multi-objective seismic design method for ensuring beam-hinging mechanism in steel frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 74, 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.01.012
  7. Choi, S.W., Kim, Y., Lee, J., Hong, K. and Park, H.S. (2013), "Minimum column-to-beam strength ratios for beam-hinge mechanisms based on multi-objective seismic design", J. Constr. Steel Res., 88, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.05.004
  8. CSI (2015), CSI Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000; Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.
  9. Dubina, D., Ciutina, A. and Stratan, A. (2001), "Cyclic tests of double-sided beam-to-column joints", J. Struct. Eng., 127(2), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(129)
  10. El-Tawil, S., Vidarsson, E., Mikesell, T. and Kunnath, S.K. (1999), "Inelastic behavior and design of steel panel zones", J. Struct. Eng., 125(2), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:2(183)
  11. Engelhardt, M.D. and Sabol, T.A. (1998), "Reinforcing of steel moment connections with cover plates: Benefits and limitations", Eng. Struct., 20(4), 510-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00038-2
  12. FEMA-355C (2000), State of the art report on systems performance; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  13. FEMA-356 (2000), Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings; American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Washington, D.C., USA.
  14. Fielding, D.J. and Huang, J.S. (1971), "Shear in steel beam-tocolumn connections", Welding J., 50(7), 313-326.
  15. Huang, J.S., Fielding, D. and Chen, W.F. (1972), "Future connection research problems", Fritz Laboratory Reports; Paper 296.
  16. Jin, J. and El-Tawil, S. (2005), "Evaluation of FEMA-350 seismic provisions for steel panel zones", J. Struct. Eng., 131(2), 250258.
  17. Kato, B. (1982), "Cold formed welded steel tubular members", Axially Compressed Structures, 149-180.
  18. Krawinkler, H. (1978), "Shear in Beam-Column Joints in Seismic Design of Frames", Eng. J., 15(3).
  19. Krawinkler, H. and Popov, E.P. (1982), "Seismic behavior of moment connections and joints", J. Struct. Div., 108(2), 373391.
  20. Lee, C.H., Jeon, S.W., Kim, J.H. and Uang, C.M. (2005), "Effects of panel zone strength and beam web connection method on seismic performance of reduced beam section steel moment connections", J. Struct. Eng., 131(12), 1854-1865. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1854)
  21. Liu, X.G., Tao, M.X., Fan, J.S. and Hajjar, J.F. (2014), "Comparative study of design procedures for CFST-to-steel girder panel zone shear strength", J. Constr. Steel Res., 94, 114121.
  22. Mele, E., Calado, L. and De Luca, A. (2001), "Cyclic behaviour of beam-to-column welded connections", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 1(3), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2001.1.3.269
  23. Nasrabadi, M.M., Torabian, S. and Mirghaderi, S.R. (2013), "Panel zone modelling of flanged cruciform columns: An analytical and numerical approach", Eng. Struct., 49, 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.029
  24. Pan, L., Chen, Y., Chuan, G., Jiao, W. and Xu, T. (2016), "Experimental evaluation of the effect of vertical connecting plates on panel zone shear stability", Thin-Wall. Struct., 99, 119131.
  25. Popov, E.P. (1987), "Panel zone flexibility in seismic moment hoints", J. Constr. Steel Res., 8, 91-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(87)90055-1
  26. Popov, E.P. (1988), "Seismic moment connections for MRFs", J. Constr. Steel Res., 10, 163-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(88)90030-2
  27. Popov, E.P. and Pinkney, B.R. (1969), "Cyclic yield reversal in steel building connections", J. Struct. Div.
  28. Popov, E.P., Tsai, K.C. and Engelhard, M.D. (1989) "On seismic steel joints and connections", Eng. Struct., 11(3), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(89)90003-5
  29. Schneider, S.P. and Amidi, A. (1998), "Seismic behavior of steel frames with deformable panel zones", J. Struct. Eng., 124(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:1(35)
  30. Schneider, S.P., Roeder, C.W. and Carpenter, J.E. (1993), "Seismic behavior of moment-resisting steel frames: Experimental study", J. Struct. Eng., 119(6), 1885-1902. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:6(1885)
  31. Tsai, K.C. and Popov, E.P. (1988), "Steel beam-column joints in seismic moment resisting frames", Report no. UCB/EERC88/19; Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  32. Tuna, M. and Topkaya, C. (2015), "Panel zone deformation demands in steel moment resisting frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 110, 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.017
  33. Xue, M., Kaufmann, E.J., Lu, L.W. and Fisher, J.W. (1996), "Achieving ductile behavior of moment connections - Part II", Modem Steel Construction.
  34. Zekioglu, A., Mozaffarian, H. and Uang, C.M. (1997), "Moment frame connection development and testing for the city of Hope National Medical Center", Building to Last, ASCE.