DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Do-It-Yourself (DIY) manufacture of a Nano-LC MALDI spotter robot using 3D printing technology

  • Lee, Jae-ung (Department of Chemistry, Sogang University) ;
  • Oh, Han Bin (Department of Chemistry, Sogang University)
  • Received : 2017.05.26
  • Accepted : 2017.06.21
  • Published : 2017.08.25

Abstract

In the era of the forth Industrial Revolution, open source code and open source hardware have gained much attention. In particular, 3D printing technology is expanding into the realms of classical science, technology and our daily lives. Relatedly, in the present study, we demonstrate the manufacture of a nano-LC MALDI spotter robot using 3D printing technology. The parts of the spotter robot were either made using a 3D printer or purchased as 3D printer parts from the 3D printer online market, so that anyone can make the robot without a deep knowledge of engineering or electronics, i.e., DIY (do-it-yourself) product. In the nano-LC MALDI spotter, the nano-LC eluent and MALDI matrix were mixed in a T-union and discharged from the capillary outlet. The eluent and matrix mixture could be spotted onto the movable MALDI plate. The MALDI plate was designed to translate in a two-dimensional space (xy plane), which was enabled by the movements of two stepper motors. In the paper, all computer-aided design (CAD) files for the parts and operation software are provided to help the reader manufacture their own spotter robot.

Keywords

MALDI;Do-it-yourself;Spotter;Robot;3D printing;liquid chromatography

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Korea Basic Science Institute

References

  1. A brief history of 3D printing, https://individual.troweprice.com/staticFiles/Retail/Shared/PDFs/3D_Printing_Infographic _FINAL.pdf, Assessed May 2012.
  2. B. C. Gross and D. M. Spence, Anal. Chem., 86(7), 3240-3253 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac403397r
  3. R. Walczak and K. Adamski, J. Micromech. Microeng., 25, 085013 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/25/8/085013
  4. M. Coakley and D. E. Hurt, J. Lab. Autom., 21(4), 489-495 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2211068216649578
  5. Y. He and J.-J. Qiu, Electroanal., 28, 1658-1678 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201600043
  6. E. K. Grasse and A. W. Smith, J. Chem. Educ., 93(1), 146-151 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00654
  7. P. Lolur and R. Dawes, J. Chem. Educ., 91(8), 1181-1184 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500199m
  8. C. Stewart and J. Giannini, J. Chem. Educ., 93, 1310-1315 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00984
  9. S. M.-Jarquin and R. Winkler, Anal. Chem., 88(14), 6976-6980 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01019
  10. Y. Hioki and K. Tanaka, Anal. Chem., 86(5), 2549-2558 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac4037069
  11. Y. Yang and T. W. Thannhauser, J. Biomol. Tech., 18(4), 226-237 (2007).
  12. Polulu, https://www.pololu.com/product/1182.