DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determinants of R&D Commercialization by SMEs after Technology Transfer

  • Song, Minkyoung (University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Park, Ji-One (Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Park, Beom Soo (University of Science and Technology, Electronics and Telecommunication Research Institute)
  • Received : 2017.02.06
  • Accepted : 2017.04.14
  • Published : 2017.04.28

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors that could influence business decisions of in the commercialization of R&D when technology is transferred from government research institutes (GRIs) to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). We examine 353 such cases of technology transfer. The dependent variable is whether the licensee had the intention of following up with R&D after the technology has been transferred. The independent variables, classified into ex-ante factors and ex-post factors, consist of the involvement of SMEs into GRI R&D, technology readiness level, relatedness to existing technologies, and contribution to sales revenue and level-up of existing technologies. The results of the study show that the contribution to existing technologies has a positive impact on R&D commercialization. However, unlike our expectation, contribution to sales revenue, the involvement of SMEs into GRI R&D, technology readiness level, the relatedness to existing technologies of the technology transferred have no impact on follow-up R&D.

References

  1. Agrawal, A. (2006) Engaging the inventor: exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge, Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.508
  2. Barney, J. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive, Advantage Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  3. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2002) R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: sme empirical evidence from Belgium, American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344704
  4. Choi, Y.H. and Lee, J.J. (1998) Success factor of technology transfer to SMEs: lssons to Korean policy for technology transfer, Conference Proceedings for Korea Public Administration Society, 223-236.
  5. Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1986) An investigation into the new product process: steps, deficiencies, and impact, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3(2), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(86)90030-5
  6. D'Aveni, R.A. and Gunther, R. (1994) Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering, Free Press.
  7. Dechenaux, E., Thursby, J. and Thursby, M. (2011) Inventor moral hazard in university licensing: the role of contracts, Research Policy, 40(1), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.015
  8. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Schoonhoven, C.B. (1996) the Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms, Organization Science, 7(2), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.136
  9. Graves, S.B. and Langowitz, N.S. (1993) Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry, Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 593-605. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140803
  10. Greiner, M.A. and Franza, R.M. (2003) Barriers and bridges for successful environmental technology transfer, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(2), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022998617118
  11. Griliches, Z. (1998) R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, 1-14.
  12. Jang, J.H., Kim, W.S. and Lee, B.H. (2008) Study of certification and evaluation program on innovative small and medium enterprises, Social Science Research Review, Kyungsung University, 24(2), 153-177.
  13. Jung, H.S., Kim, Y.S. and Yeum, S.Y. (2008) Impact of joint project of delayed gap for the type of industry-university cooperation, Proceedings of 2008 Joint Conference, Korean Academic Society of Business Administration, 1-16.
  14. Kamiyama, S., Sheehan, J. and Martinez, C. (2006) Valuation and exploitation of intellectual property, OECD STI working paper 2006/5.
  15. Kim, J.G. (2005) Impact Factors of Public R&D Output, Ph.D. Dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University.
  16. Kim, J.W. (2012) The effects of Korean ventures' external collaborations on their performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), 215-224.
  17. Kim, K.H., Hyun, S.H. and Choi, Y.J. (2006) An explorative study on the factors of technology commercialization through technology transfer, Journal of IT Service, 5(3), 151-163.
  18. Kim, S.W., Jung, D.B. and Park, Y.S. (2009) Understanding and Application of Logistic Regression Analysis, Seoul: Hannah Publishing.
  19. Kim, Y.J. (2015) Technological collaboration linkages and the innovation output in small and medium-sized firms: a study on the moderating effects of absorptive capacity, Korea Business Review, 34(5), 1365-1390.
  20. Lawson, B. and Samson, D. (2001) Developing innovation capability in organizations: A dynamic capabilities approach, International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377-400. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000427
  21. Lee, H.S. and Lim, J.H. (2008) SPSS 14.0 Manual, Kyunggi-do: Bommunsa.
  22. Min, J.W. (2015) Analysis of Technology Transfer and Success Factors of Government Research Institutes, Ph.D. Dissertation, Korea University
  23. Park, J.W., Yoon, S.J. and Park, B.S. (2015) Commercialization success factors of transfer technology from public R&D and enhancing performance, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 18(1), 28-48.
  24. Rothwell, R. and Dodgson, M. (1994) Innovation and size of firm, Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, 310-324.
  25. Santoro, M. D. and Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002) Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions, Research Policy 26(7-8), 843-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00066-8
  26. Seo, J.Y. (2012) What is the determinant for R&D investment? Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 25(2), 1097-1109.
  27. Seo, Y.H. and Yang D.W. (2007) The empirical study on relationship between technology factor and technology commercialization in CT SMEs and ventures, Journal of Technology Innovation, 15(1), 44-87.
  28. Schilling, Melissa A. and Phelps, Corey C. (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: the impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation, Management Science, 53(7), 1113-1126. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0624
  29. Wiggins, R.R. and Ruefli, T.W. (2002) Sustained competitive advantage: temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance, Organization Science, 13(1), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.1.81.542
  30. Yeo, I.G. (2009) A Study on Strategy for Public Technology Transfer by an Analysis of Impact factors, Ph.D. Dissertation, Konkuk University.
  31. Zahra, S.A. Neubaum, D.O. and Huse, M. (2000) Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems, Journal of Management, 26(5), 947-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00064-7