DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of 20-day litter weight on weaned piglets' fighting behavior after group mixing and on heart rate variability in an isolation test

  • Sun, YaNan (College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University) ;
  • Lian, XinMing (College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University) ;
  • Bo, YuKun (Animal Husbandry Technology Promotion Institution of Zhangjiakou) ;
  • Guo, YuGuang (College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University) ;
  • Yan, PeiShi (College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2016.03.15
  • Accepted : 2016.05.10
  • Published : 2017.02.01

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of 20-day litter weight on behavior and heart rate variability (HRV) of piglets under stress. Methods: Forty four original litters were categorized as high litter weight (HW) litters (n = 22) and low litter weight (LW) litters (n = 22) by 20-day litter weight. From each original HW litter, three males and three females were randomly selected after weaning and the 12 piglets from two original litters with similar age of days were regrouped into one new high litter weight (NHW) litter (11 NHW litters in total). The original LW litters were treated with a same program, so that there were 11 new low litter weight (NLW) litters as well. The latencies to first fighting, fighting frequencies and duration within three hours were recorded after regrouping and the lesions on body surface within 48 hours were scored. Besides, HR (heart rate, bpm, beats per minute) and activity count (ACT), time domain indexes and frequency domain indexes of the piglets were measured in an isolation trial to analyze the discrepancy in coping with stress between the original HW and LW litters. Results: The results exhibited that piglets from the HW litters launched fighting sooner and got statistically higher skin lesion score than those from the LW litters (p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively). Regarding the HRV detection, compared with the HW litters, the LW litters exhibited a lower mean HR (p<0.05). In the isolation test, a highly significant higher ACT value was observed between the HW litters, compared to the LW litters (p<0.01). Significant differences were observed in standard deviation of R-R intervals, standard deviation of all normal to normal intervals, and most frequency-domain indicators: very low-frequency, low-frequency, and high frequency between the HW and LW litters as well. The difference in LF:HF was not significant (p = 0.779). Conclusion: This study suggests that compared with litters of low 20-day litter weights, litters with higher 20-day litter weight take more positive strategies to cope with stress and have stronger HRV regulation capacity; HW litters demonstrate better anti-stress and adaptation capacity in the case of regrouping and isolation.

Keywords

Fighting Behavior;Isolation Test;Skin Lesion Score;Heart Rate Variability;Autonomic Nervous System

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry of Agriculture

References

  1. Mesa H, Safranski TJ, Johnson RK, Lamberson WR. Correlated response in placental efficiency in swine selected for an index of components of lifter size. J Anim Sci 2003;81:74-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81174x
  2. Wang J, Yang M, Xu S, et al. Comparative effects of sodium butyrate and flavors on feed intake of lactating sows and growth performance of piglets. Anim Sci J 2014;85:683-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12193
  3. Algers B, Jensen P, Steinwall L. Behaviour and weight changes at weaning and regrouping of pigs in relation to teat quality. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1990;26:143-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90094-T
  4. Fels M, Hoy S, Hartung J. Influence of origin litter on social rank, agonistic behaviour and growth performance of piglets after weaning. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2012;139:225-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.03.017
  5. Colson V, Martin E, Orgeur P, Prunier A. Influence of housing and social changes on growth, behaviour and cortisol in piglets at weaning. Physiol Behav 2012;107:59-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.06.001
  6. Melotti L, Oostindjer M, Bolhuis JE, Held S, Mendl M. Coping personality type and environmental enrichment affect aggression at weaning in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;133:144-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.018
  7. Rhim S-J, Son S-H, Hwang H-S, Lee J-K, Hong J-K. Effects of Mixing on the Aggressive Behavior of Commercially Housed Pigs. Asian- Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:1038-43. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0907
  8. Samarakone TS, Gonyou HW. Domestic pigs alter their social strategy in response to social group size. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009; 121:8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.08.006
  9. Turner SP, Roehe R, D'Eath RB, et al. Genetic validation of postmixing skin injuries in pigs as an indicator of aggressiveness and the relationship with injuries under more stable social conditions. J Anim Sci 2009;87:3076-82. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1558
  10. Fraser D. Vocalizations of isolated piglets. I. Sources of variation and relationships among measures. Applied Animal Ethology 1975; 1:387-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(75)90075-9
  11. Pollard JC, Littlejohn RP. Consistency in avoidance of humans by individual red deer. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995;45:301-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00592-G
  12. Zupan M, Janczak AM, Framstad T, Zanella AJ. The effect of biting tails and having tails bitten in pigs. Physiol Behav 2012;106:638-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.025
  13. von Borell E, Langbein J, Despres G, et al. Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals - A review. Physiol Behav 2007; 92:293-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.007
  14. Marchant-Forde RM, Marchant-Forde JN. Pregnancy-related changes in behavior and cardiac activity in primiparous pigs. Physiol Behav 2004;82:815-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.06.021
  15. Lee H-H, Chen B-Y, Lo S-H, Chen P-C, Guo Y-L. 0248 Predicting physician's duty stress by parasympathetic nervous function (also to be considered for mini-symposium: Early detection and management of workers under stress). Occup. Environ. Med. Suppl 2014; 71:A93.1-A. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2014-102362.290
  16. Kuwahara M, Suzuki A, Tsutsumi H, Tanigawa M, Tsubone H, Sugano S. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability for assessment of diurnal variation of autonomic nervous activity in miniature swine. Lab Anim Sci 1999;49:202-8.
  17. de Jong IC, Sgoifo A, Lambooij E, Korte SM, Blokhuis HJ, Koolhaas JM. Effects of social stress on heart rate and heart rate variability in growing pigs. Can J Anim Sci 80:273-80. https://doi.org/10.4141/A99-085
  18. Stookey JM, Gonyou HW. Recognition in swine: recognition through familiarity or genetic relatedness? Appl Anim Behav Sci 1998;55: 291-305.
  19. Melotti L, Oostindjer M, Bolhuis JE, Held S, Mendl M. Coping personality type and environmental enrichment affect aggression at weaning in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;133:144-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.018
  20. Bolhuis JE, Schouten WGP, Schrama JW, Wiegant VM. Individual coping characteristics, aggressiveness and fighting strategies in pigs. Anim Behav 2005;69:1085-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.09.013
  21. Li Y, Wang L. Effects of previous housing system on agonistic behaviors of growing pigs at mixing. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;132: 20-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.03.009
  22. Forkman BaMH. The maintenance of stable dominance hierarchies and the pattern of aggression: support for the suppression hypothesis. Ethology 2005;110:737-44.
  23. Seguin MJ, Barney D, Widowski TM. Assessment of a group-housing system for gestating sows:Effects of space allowance and pen size on the incidence ofsuperficial skin lesions, changes in body condition, and farrowing performance. J Swine Health Prod 2006;14: 89-96.
  24. Hainsworth R. The control and physiological importance of heart rate. In: Heart Rate Variability 1995.
  25. Stahl WR. Scaling of respiratory variables in mammals. J Appl Physiol 1967;22:453-60. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1967.22.3.453
  26. Physick-Sheard PW, Marlin DJ, Thornhill R, Schroter RC. Frequency domain analysis of heart rate variability in horses at rest and during exercise. Equine Vet J 2000;32:253-62.
  27. Ponikowski P, Anker SD, Chua TP, et al. Depressed heart rate variability as an independent predictor of death in chronic congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1645-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00215-4
  28. Dupjan S, Tuchscherer A, Langbein J, Schon PC, Manteuffel G, Puppe B. Behavioural and cardiac responses towards conspecific distress calls in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Physiol Behav 2011; 103:445-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.03.017
  29. Porges SW. The Polyvagal Theory: phylogenetic contributions to social behavior. Physiol Behav 2003;79:503-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00156-2
  30. Koolhaas JM, Korte SM, De Boer SF, et al. Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1999;23:925-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(99)00026-3
  31. Zhong X, Hilton HJ, Gates GJ, et al. Increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic cardiovascular modulation in normal humans with acute sleep deprivation. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2005; 98:2024-32. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00620.2004