Comparative nitrogen use efficiency of urea and pig slurry for regrowth yield and nutritive value in perennial ryegrass sward

  • Park, Sang Hyun (Department of Animal Science, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Bok Rye (Department of Animal Science, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Won Mo (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Tae Hwan (Department of Animal Science, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2016.07.05
  • Accepted : 2016.09.08
  • Published : 2017.04.01


Objective: The study aimed to assess the N use efficiency (NUE) of pig slurry (in comparison with chemical fertilizer) for each regrowth yield and annual herbage production and their nutritive value. Methods: Consecutive field experiments were separately performed using a single application with a full dose of N (200 kg N/ha) in 2014 and by four split applications in 2015 in different sites. The experiment consisted of three treatments: i) control plots that received no additional N, ii) chemical fertilizer-N as urea, and iii) pig-slurry-N with five replicates. Results: The effect of N fertilization on herbage yield, N recovery in herbage, residual inorganic N in soil, and crude protein were significantly positive. When comparing the NUE between the two N sources (urea and pig slurry), pig slurry was significantly less effective for the earlier two regrowth periods, as shown by lower regrowth dry matter (DM) yield, N amount recovered in herbage, and inorganic N availability in soil at the 1st and 2nd cut compared to those of urea-applied plots. However, the effect of split application of the two N sources was significantly positive at the last two regrowth periods (at the 3rd and 4th cut). The two N sources and/or split application had little or no influence on neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content, acid detergent fiber (ADF) content, and in vitro DM digestibility, whereas cutting date was a large source of variation for these variables, resulting in a significant increase in in vitro DM digestibility for the last two regrowth periods when an increase in NDF and ADF content occurred. Split application of N reduced the N loss via nitrate leaching by 36% on average for the two N sources compared to a single application. Conclusion: The pig slurry-N was utilized as efficiently as urea-N for annual herbage yield, with a significant increase in NUE especially for the latter regrowth periods.


Lolium perenne;Nitrate Leaching;N Use Efficiency;Nutritive Value;Pig Slurry;Regrowth


Supported by : Rural Development Administration


  1. Outcome of animal waste generation and recycling (2006-2012). Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, 2013.
  2. Oh IH, Kim WG, Jang CH, Eltawil MA. Animal waste management in Korea and anaerobic co-fermentation process using the swine manure with organic by product. In: Agricultural Technologies in a Changing Climate: The 2009 CIGR International Symposium of the Australian Society for Engineering in Agriculture. Brisbane, Australia: Australian Society for Engineering; 2009. p. 282-9.
  3. Rochette P, Chantigny MH, Angers DA, Bertrand N, Cote D. Ammonia volatilization and soil nitrogen dynamics following fall application of pig slurry on canola crop residues. Can J Soil Sci 2001;81;515-23.
  4. Sommer SG, Hutchings NJ. Ammonia emission fromfield applied manure and its reduction. Eur J Agron 2001;15:1-15.
  5. Chantigny MH, Angers DA, Morvan T, Pomar C. Dynamics of pig slurry nitrogen in soil and plant as determined with $^{15}N$. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2004;68:637-43.
  6. Chantigny MH, Rochette P, Angers DA. Short-term Cand N dynamics in a soil amended with pig slurry and barley straw: A field experiment. Can J Soil Sci 2001;81:131-37.
  7. Morvan T, Leterme P, Arsene GG, Mary B. Nitrogen transformations after the spreading of pig slurry on bare soil and ryegrass using $^{15}N$-labelled ammonium. Eur J Agron 1997;7:181-88.
  8. Schroder J. Revisiting the agronomic benefits of manure: a correct assessment and exploitation of its fertilizer values spares the environment. Bioresource Technol 2005;96:253-61.
  9. Chadwick DR, Weerden T, Martinez J, Pain BF. Nitrogen transformations and losses following pig slurry applications to a natural soil filter system (Solepur Process) in Brittany, France. J Agr Eng Res 1998:6985-93.
  10. Maag M, Vinther FP. Effect of temperature and water on gaseous emissions from soils treated with animal manure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1999;63:858-65.
  11. Svoboda N, Taube F, Wienforth B, et al. Nitrogen leaching losses after biogas residue application to maize. Soil Till Res 2013;130:69-80.
  12. Wang S, Luo S, Li X, et al. Effect of split application of nitrogen on nitrous oxide emission from plastic mulching maize in the semiarid Loess Plateau. Agr Ecosys Environ 2016;220:21-7.
  13. Hoekstra NJ, Lalor STJ, Richards KG, et al. Slurry $^{15}NH_4$-N recovery in herbage and soil: effects of application method and timing. Plant soil 2010;330:357-68.
  14. Schroder J. Effect of split application of cattle slurry and mineral fertilizer-N on the yield of silage maize in a slurry-based cropping system. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 1999;53:209-18.
  15. Burger M, Jackson LE. Microbial immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in relation to ammonification and nitrification rates in organic and conventional cropping systems. Soil Biol Biochem 2003;35:29-36.
  16. Beckwith CP, Lewis PJ, Chalmers AG, Forment MA, Smith KA. Successive annual application of organic manure cut grass: Shortterm observation on utilization of manure nitrogen. Grass Forage Sci 2002;57:191-202.
  17. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97.
  18. Tilley JMA, Terry RA. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J Brit Grassland Soc 1963;18:104-11.
  19. Keeney DR, Nelson DW. Nitrogen-Inorganic forms. In: Page AL, Miller RH, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy Monograph 9. Madison, WI: The American Society of Agronomy; 1982. p. 643-698.
  20. Kelly H, Annemie R, Hauke S, Dirk S, Winnie D. Determinants of the microbial community structure of eutrophic, hyporheic river sediments polluted with chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2014;87:715-32.
  21. Pontes LS, Carrere P, Andueza D, Louault F, Soussana JF. Seasonal productivity and nutritive value of native temperate grasses. Responses to cutting frequency and N supply. Grass Forage Sci 2007;62:485-96.
  22. Lemaire G, Salette J. The effects of temperature and fertilizer nitrogen on the growth of two forage grasses in spring. Grass Forage Sci 1982;37:191-98.
  23. Reid D. The effects of frequency of defoliation on the yield response of perennial ryegrass sward to a wide range of nitrogen applications. J Agric Sci 1978;90:447-57.
  24. Hanley KP, Murphy M. Comparative effects of animal manures and fertilisers on grass in pot experiments. Irish J Agric Res 1976;15:146-51.
  25. Choi WJ, Ro HM, Chang SX. Recovery of fertilizer-derived inorganic-$^{15}N$ in a vegetable field soil as affected by application of an organic amendment. Plant Soil 2004;263:191-201.
  26. Peyraud JL, Astigarraga L. Review of the effect of nitrogen fertilization on the chemical composition, intake, digestion and nutritive value of fresh herbage: consequences on animal nutrition and N balance. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1998;72:235-59.
  27. Van Soest PJ. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1994. p. 476.
  28. Burns JC, Chamblee DS, Giesbrecht FG. Defoliation intensity effects on season-long dry matter distribution and nutritive value of tall fescue. Crop Sci 2002;42:1274-84.
  29. Scheneiter JO, Camarasa J, Carrete JR, Amendola C. Is the nutritive value of tall fescue (Festuca arundinasea Schreb.) related to the accumulated forage mass? Grass Forage Sci 2014;71:102-11.
  30. Groot JC, Neuteboom JH. Composition and digestibility during ageing of Italian ryegrass leaves of consecutive insertion the same levels. J Sci Food Agric 1997;75:227-36.<227::AID-JSFA869>3.0.CO;2-F
  31. Nave RLG, Sulc RM, Barker DJ. Relationships of forage nutritive value to cool-season grass canopy characteristics. Crop Sci 2013;53:341-8.
  32. Nelson CJ, Moser LE. Plant factors affecting forage quality. In: Fahey GC Jr, Collins M, Mertens DR, Moser LE, editors. Forage quality, evaluation and utilization. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, SSSA; 1994. p. 115-54.
  33. Moore KJ, Jung HG. Lignin and fiber digestion. J Range Manage 2001;54:420-30.
  34. European Commission (EC). Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 12th of December 2006 on the protection of ground water against pollution and deterioration. Off J Eur Union; 2006. L372/19-31.

Cited by

  1. Changes in Nitrogen Mineralization as Affected by Soil Temperature and Moisture vol.38, pp.3, 2018,
  2. Acidification of pig slurry effects on ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions, nitrate leaching, and perennial ryegrass regrowth as estimated by 15N-urea flux vol.31, pp.3, 2018,