The Impact of C.E.O's social responsibility and labor relations attitude on job performance

경영자의 사회적책임과 노사관계태도가 직무수행에 미치는 영향

  • Choi, Seung-Il (Dept. of International Trade, Changwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Il (Dept. of Business Administration, Pusan National University)
  • 최승일 (창원대학교 국제무역학과) ;
  • 김동일 (부산대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2016.11.17
  • Accepted : 2017.01.20
  • Published : 2017.01.28


The company strives constantly to prepare for the current crisis and uncertainty of the future and to strengthen its competitiveness. At times, it strives to strengthen its competitiveness through continuous innovation, as well as securing technological innovation and talented personnel. However, even if the company makes such a hard effort, the sustainable growth of the enterprise will not be guaranteed unless smooth communication and efforts among the internal resources are supported. The social responsibility of management and the attitude of labor-management relations are important factors for the smooth coordination of labor-management relations. Therefore, this study empirically analyzed the relationship between manager 's social responsibility, labor relations attitude and job performance. The results of this study showed that the social responsibility of managers affects job satisfaction and job commitment. In addition, managers' attitudes toward labor relations have an effect on job satisfaction and job commitment. Also, job satisfaction has a positive effect on job commitment. The result of this study can be used as a practical application data for establishing new labor - management relations among the managers of the enterprise in the future.


  1. H. J. Jang(2012). "The causal relationships among the In-firm certificate holders motivation for certification and the effect variables of the certification on human resource development,"Seoul National University, Ph. D..
  2. Robinson, D. G., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). Performance consulting: A practical guide for HR and learning professionals (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  3. Locke, E. A.(1976), The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction, in M. Dunnette(ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Chicago: Rand-McNally.
  4. Haj-Yahia, M., Barga, D. & Guterman, N. B.(2000). Perception of job satisfaction, service effectiveness and burnout among Arab social workers in Israel, International Journal of Social Welfare, 9(3), pp. 201-210.
  5. Kahn, W. A.(1990),"Psychological conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at work," Academy of Management Journal, 33, pp. 692-724.
  6. May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., and Harter, L. M.(2004), "The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work,"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), pp. 11-37.
  7. Cooke, W. N.(1990), "Labor-management Corporate: New Partnership in Going in Circles?", Karnmazoo, Ann arbor, Michigan: W.E. Up Johan Institute for Employment Pesearch, 12(1), pp. 39-54.
  8. Dyer, L. and Kochan, T. A.(1997), "Union Attitudes toward Management Cooperation", Industrial Relations, 16(2), pp. 163-172.
  9. S. S. Park(1994), "A Study on Organizational Characteristics of Excellent Small Business and The Stability of Their Management-labor Relations in Korea," Kyungnam University, Ph. D..
  10. S. B. Park(1999), "An Empirical study on the management-labor relations in tourist hotels," Kyungnam University, Ph. D..
  11. S. R.(2004), "A study on the effects of corporate ethical environment on corporate social responsibility and business performance," Changwon National University, Ph. D..