DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Land Use Optimization using Genetic Algorithms - Focused on Yangpyeong-eup -

유전 알고리즘을 적용한 토지이용 최적화 배분 연구 - 양평군 양평읍 일대를 대상으로 -

  • Received : 2016.05.23
  • Accepted : 2016.12.28
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

Sustainable development is important because the ultimate objective is efficient development combining the economic, social, and environmental aspects of urban conservation. Despite Korea's rapid urbanization and economic development, the distribution of resources is inefficient, and land-use is not an exception. Land use distribution is difficult, as it requires considering a variety of purposes, whose solutions lie in a multipurpose optimization process. In this study, Yangpyeong-eup, Yangpyeong, Gyeonggi-do, is selected, as the site has ecological balance, is well-preserved, and has the potential to support population increases. Further, we have used the genetic algorithm method, as it helps to evolve solutions for complex spatial problems such as planning and distribution of land use. This study applies change to the way of mutation. With four goals and restrictions of area, spatial objectives, minimizing land use conversion, ecological conservation, maximizing economic profit, restricting area to a specific land use, and setting a fixed area, we developed an optimal planning map. No urban areas at the site needed preservation and the high urban area growth rate coincided with the optimization of purpose and maximization of economic profit. When the minimum point of the fitness score is the convergence point, we found optimization occurred approximately at 1500 generations. The results of this study can support planning at Yangpyeong-eup.ausative relationship between the perception of improving odor regulation and odor acceptance.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 환경부

References

  1. Aerts JCJH, Eisinger E, Heuvelink GBM., Stewart TJ. 2003. Using linear integer programming for multi-site land use allocation. Geographical Analysis. 35: 148-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.2003.tb01106.x
  2. Aerts JCJH, Heuvelink GBM. 2002. Using simulated annealing for resource allocation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 16(6): 571-587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810210138751
  3. Balling RJ, Brown MR, Day K. 1999. Multiobjective urban planning using genetic algorithm. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 125(2): 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1999)125:2(86)
  4. Cao K, Batty M, Huang B, Liu Y, Yu L, Chen J. 2011. Spatial multi-objective land use optimization: extensions to the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 25(12): 1949-1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.570269
  5. Cao K, Huang B, Wang S, Lin H. 2012. Sustainable land use optimization using Boundary-based Fast Genetic Algorithm. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 36(3): 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.08.001
  6. Choi YG. 2013. The research of finding Cooperation of Land Use and Environment policy for Developing land harmonized with the environment. KRIHS POLICY BRIEF. 425. [Korean Literature]
  7. Chung SS, Jeong SC. 2014. A Study on Urban Land use Drafting Plan Improvement Method through a Comparison Analysis of the Current Residential Area Status and the Demand Forecast Model -With a Focus on a Residential Area Example-. Korea Real Estate Academy. 57: 195-209. [Korean Literature]
  8. Guldmann JM. 1979. Urban land use allocation and environmental pollution control: an intertemporal optimization approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 13(2): 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(79)90041-7
  9. Huang B, Zhang W. 2014. Sustainable land-use planning for a downtown lake area in central China: multiobjective optimization approach aided by urban growth modeling. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 140(2): 04014002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000186
  10. Janssen R, Van Herwijnen M, Stewart TJ, Aerts JC. 2008. Multiobjective decision support for land-use planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 35(4): 740-756. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33071
  11. Kim EY, Jeon SW, Song WK, Gwack JR, Lee J. 2012. Application of ECVAM as a Indicator for Monitoring National Environment in Korea. 11(2): 3-16. [Korean Literature]
  12. Ligmann-Zielinska A, Church RL, Jankowski P. 2008. Spatial optimization as a generative technique for sustainable multiobjective land-use allocation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 22(6): 601-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701587495
  13. Liu X, Ou J, Li X, Ai B. 2013. Combining system dynamics and hybrid particle swarm optimization for land use allocation. Ecological Modelling. 257: 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.027
  14. Liu Y, Tang W, He J, Liu Y, Ai T, Liu D. 2015. A land-use spatial optimization model based on genetic optimization and game theory. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 49: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.09.002
  15. Liu Y, Yuan M, He J, Liu Y. 2015. Regional land-use allocation with a spatially explicit genetic algorithm. Landscape and Ecological Engineering. 11(1): 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-014-0267-6
  16. Masnavi MR. 2000. The new millennium and the new urban paradigm: the compact city in practice. Achieving sustainable urban form, 64-73.
  17. Ma X, Zhao X. 2015. Land Use Allocation Based on a Multi-Objective Artificial Immune Optimization Model: An Application in Anlu County, China. Sustainability. 7(11): 15632-15651. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115632
  18. Memmah MM, Lescourret F, Yao X, Lavigne C. 2015. Metaheuristics for agricultural land use optimization. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 35(3): 975-998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0303-4
  19. Moon BR. 2008. Easy Classing Genetic Algorithm. Hanbit Media. Seoul. [Korean Literature]
  20. Morio M, Schadler S, Finkel M. 2013. Applying a multi-criteria genetic algorithm framework for brownfield reuse optimization: Improving redevelopment options based on stakeholder preferences. Journal of Environmental Management. 130: 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.002
  21. Park CS. 2005. The Research of Considering Ecological Efficiency of Urban Land Use. [Korean Literature]
  22. Stewart TJ, Janssen R. 2014. A multiobjective GIS-based land use planning algorithm. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 46: 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.04.002
  23. Stewart TJ, Janssen R, Van Herwijnen M. 2004. A genetic algorithm approach to multiobjective land use planning. Computers and Operations Research. 31(14): 2293-2313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00188-6
  24. Wang X, Yu S, Huang GH. 2004. Land allocation based on integrated GIS optimization modeling at a watershed level. Landscape and Urban Planning. 66: 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00095-1
  25. Wardoyo W, Jordan GA. 1996. Measuring and assessing management of forested landscapes. The Forestry Chronicle. 72(6): 639-645. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc72639-6
  26. WCED. 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  27. Yang-pyeonggun. 2016. Hope&Happiness Yangpyung. [Korean Literature]
  28. Zhang W, Huang B. 2014. Land Use Optimization for a Rapidly Urbanizing City with Regard to Local Climate Change: Shenzhen as a Case Study. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 141(1).