DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

BIBFRAME 2.0 특징 분석 및 BIBFRAME 구축시 고려사항에 관한 연구

A Study on the Considerations in Constructing BIBFRAME by Analyzing BIBFRAME 2.0

  • 이미화 (공주대학교 사범대학 문헌정보교육과)
  • 투고 : 2017.11.11
  • 심사 : 2017.12.14
  • 발행 : 2017.12.30

초록

본고는 국내에서 BIBFRAME 구축을 위한 세부적인 방안 마련의 필요성을 인식하고 BIBFRAME 2.0의 특징을 변경사항을 중심으로 분석하고 이를 바탕으로 BIBFRAME 구축시 고려사항을 제시하고자 문헌연구를 실시하였다. 고려사항으로 첫째, BIBFRAME 2.0에서 핵심 개체로서 표현형 개체의 추가 혹은 표현형의 명확한 기술 방안의 필요성을 제기하였다. 둘째, 자료유형별 다양한 기술 요소를 BIBFRAME과 매핑하여 BIBFRAME에서 RDA 요소의 반영여부를 파악하고, BIBFRAME 속성, 클래스 어휘의 개발을 제안하였다. 셋째, BIBFRAME에서 우선표제 및 우선이름 기술을 위한 목록규칙 개발의 필요성을 제안하였다. 본 연구는 BIBFRAME 2.0 어휘가 지속적으로 변경되고 개발중인 상황에서 BIBFRAME 모델의 개정과 개발에 기여할 수 있을 것이다

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 한국연구재단

참고문헌

  1. Taniguchi, Shoichi. 2015. "BIBFRAME and Its Issues." Journal of Information Processing and Management, 58(1): 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.58.20
  2. Park, Ok Nam & Jung Sun Oh. 2014. "Deployment of BIBFRAME as a New Bibliographic Framework in Linked Data." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(4): 235-263. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.4.235
  3. Park, Zi-young. 2016. "Linking Bibliographic Data and Public Library Service Data Using Bibliographic Framework." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(1): 293-316. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.293
  4. Baker, Thomas, Karen Coyle, & Sean Petiay. 2014. "Multi-entity Models of Resource Description in the Semantic Web." Library Hi Tech, 32(4): 562-582. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2014-0081
  5. Billy, A. 2012. The Future of Bibliographic Description is Here ... Wait a Minute! CatalogingRules. [인용 2017. 9. 15].
  6. Coyle, Karen. 2004. "Future Considerations: the Functional Library Systems Record." Library Hi Tech, 22(2): 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830410524594
  7. Dean, Jason W. 2013. "Charles A. Cutter and Edward Tufte: Coming to a Library Near You, Via BIBFRAME." In the Library with the Lead Pipe, 2013(Dec). [인용 2017. 9. 15].
  8. Gonzales, Brighid M. 2014. "Linking Libraries to the Web: Linked Data and the Future of the Bibliographic Record." Information Technology and Libraries, 2014(Dec): 10-22.
  9. Hess, Kirk. 2017. "BIBFRAME Profiles." In 2017 Proceedings of the International Confer ence on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications(Washington, DC, 26-29 October 2017). [인용 2017. 10. 29].
  10. Jin, Qiang, Jim Hahn, and Gretchen Croll. 2016. "BIBFRAME Transformation for Enhanced Discovery." LRTS, 60(4): 223-235. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.60n4.223
  11. Kroeger, A. 2013. "The Road to BIBFRAME: The Evolution of the Idea of Bibliographic Transition into a Post-MARC Future." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(8): 873-890. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2013.823584
  12. Library of Congress. 2014. BIBFRAME Profiles: Introduction and Specification. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  13. Library of Congress. 2015. Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME) in Action. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  14. Library of Congress. 2016a. Overview of the BIBFRAME 2.0 Model. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  15. Library of Congress. 2016b. BIBFRAME 2.0 Guidelines: Expressing Characteristics of a BIBFRAME Resource. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  16. Library of Congress. 2016c. BIBFRAME 2.0 Vocabulary Category View. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  17. Library of Congress. 2016d. BIBFRAME 2.0 Vocabulary List View. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  18. Library of Congress. 2017a. BIBFRAME 2.0: Event Model. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  19. Library of Congress. 2017b. BIBFRAME 2.0 Specification: Title Notes. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  20. Library of Congress. 2017c. BIBFRAME 2.0: Identifier Notes. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  21. Library of Congress. 2017d. BIBFRAME 2.0: Notes. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  22. Library of Congress. 2017e. BIBFRAME 2.0: Expressing Roles. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  23. McCallum, S. 2013. "Bibliographic Framework Initiative: Data from MARC." In ALA Midwinter Conference(Seattle, WA, Jan. 26, 2013). [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  24. McCallum, S. 2017a. Library of Congress Pilot 2: More, More Complete, More Interactive. [인용2017. 7. 15].
  25. McCallum, S. 2017b. "BIBFRAME Development." JLIS.it, 8(3): 71-85. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  26. Miller, Eric, Uche Ogbuji, Victoria Mueller, & Kathy MacDougall. 2012. Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data. [인용 2017. 2. 15].
  27. Mitchell, Erik T. 2013. "Three Case Studies in Linked Open Data." Library Technology Reports, 2013(July): 26-43.
  28. RDA. 2017. RDA Element Sets. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  29. Shieh, J. 2013. "A Transformative Opportunity: BIBFRAME at the George Washington University, an Early Experimenter." Information Standards Quarterly, 25(4): 17-21. https://doi.org/10.3789/isqv25no4.2013.04
  30. Taniguchi, Shoichi. 2017. "Examining BIBFRAME 2.0 from the Viewpoint of RDA Metadata Schema." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55(6): 387-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1322161
  31. Tharani, Karim. 2015. "Linked Data in Libraries: A Case Study of Harvesting and Sharing Bibliographic Metadata with BIBFRAME." Information Technology and Libraries, 2015(March): 5-19.
  32. Washington University Library. 2016. Mapping of RDA Core to BIBFRAME 2.0. [인용2017. 7. 15].
  33. Welsh, A. 2017. "From WEMI to WII: FRBR, BIBFRAME and the 21st Century Bibliographic Model." Catalogue and Index, 186: 20-29. [인용2017. 7. 15].