DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Considerations in Constructing BIBFRAME by Analyzing BIBFRAME 2.0

BIBFRAME 2.0 특징 분석 및 BIBFRAME 구축시 고려사항에 관한 연구

  • 이미화 (공주대학교 사범대학 문헌정보교육과)
  • Received : 2017.11.11
  • Accepted : 2017.12.14
  • Published : 2017.12.30

Abstract

This study is to suggest the considerations in constructing BIBFRAME by analyzing change feature of BIBFRAME 2.0 under recognizing the needs of the detailed methods for BIBFRAME construction in Korea through literature review as research methods. First, it is to add or to describe expression level as the core entity in BIBFRAME 2.0. Second, it is to extend classes and properties as BIBFRAME vocabulary to reflect the RDA elements by testing the various materials. Third, preferred title and preferred name is to be described in BIBFRAME and Korean Cataloging Rules related to authorized access point is to be regulated. This study could contribute to develop BIBFRAME development and revision under revising BIBFRAME vocabularies ongoing.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Taniguchi, Shoichi. 2015. "BIBFRAME and Its Issues." Journal of Information Processing and Management, 58(1): 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.58.20
  2. Park, Ok Nam & Jung Sun Oh. 2014. "Deployment of BIBFRAME as a New Bibliographic Framework in Linked Data." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(4): 235-263. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.4.235
  3. Park, Zi-young. 2016. "Linking Bibliographic Data and Public Library Service Data Using Bibliographic Framework." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(1): 293-316. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.293
  4. Baker, Thomas, Karen Coyle, & Sean Petiay. 2014. "Multi-entity Models of Resource Description in the Semantic Web." Library Hi Tech, 32(4): 562-582. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2014-0081
  5. Billy, A. 2012. The Future of Bibliographic Description is Here ... Wait a Minute! CatalogingRules. [인용 2017. 9. 15].
  6. Coyle, Karen. 2004. "Future Considerations: the Functional Library Systems Record." Library Hi Tech, 22(2): 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830410524594
  7. Dean, Jason W. 2013. "Charles A. Cutter and Edward Tufte: Coming to a Library Near You, Via BIBFRAME." In the Library with the Lead Pipe, 2013(Dec). [인용 2017. 9. 15].
  8. Gonzales, Brighid M. 2014. "Linking Libraries to the Web: Linked Data and the Future of the Bibliographic Record." Information Technology and Libraries, 2014(Dec): 10-22.
  9. Hess, Kirk. 2017. "BIBFRAME Profiles." In 2017 Proceedings of the International Confer ence on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications(Washington, DC, 26-29 October 2017). [인용 2017. 10. 29].
  10. Jin, Qiang, Jim Hahn, and Gretchen Croll. 2016. "BIBFRAME Transformation for Enhanced Discovery." LRTS, 60(4): 223-235. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.60n4.223
  11. Kroeger, A. 2013. "The Road to BIBFRAME: The Evolution of the Idea of Bibliographic Transition into a Post-MARC Future." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51(8): 873-890. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2013.823584
  12. Library of Congress. 2014. BIBFRAME Profiles: Introduction and Specification. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  13. Library of Congress. 2015. Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME) in Action. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  14. Library of Congress. 2016a. Overview of the BIBFRAME 2.0 Model. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  15. Library of Congress. 2016b. BIBFRAME 2.0 Guidelines: Expressing Characteristics of a BIBFRAME Resource. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  16. Library of Congress. 2016c. BIBFRAME 2.0 Vocabulary Category View. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  17. Library of Congress. 2016d. BIBFRAME 2.0 Vocabulary List View. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  18. Library of Congress. 2017a. BIBFRAME 2.0: Event Model. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  19. Library of Congress. 2017b. BIBFRAME 2.0 Specification: Title Notes. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  20. Library of Congress. 2017c. BIBFRAME 2.0: Identifier Notes. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  21. Library of Congress. 2017d. BIBFRAME 2.0: Notes. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  22. Library of Congress. 2017e. BIBFRAME 2.0: Expressing Roles. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  23. McCallum, S. 2013. "Bibliographic Framework Initiative: Data from MARC." In ALA Midwinter Conference(Seattle, WA, Jan. 26, 2013). [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  24. McCallum, S. 2017a. Library of Congress Pilot 2: More, More Complete, More Interactive. [인용2017. 7. 15].
  25. McCallum, S. 2017b. "BIBFRAME Development." JLIS.it, 8(3): 71-85. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  26. Miller, Eric, Uche Ogbuji, Victoria Mueller, & Kathy MacDougall. 2012. Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data. [인용 2017. 2. 15].
  27. Mitchell, Erik T. 2013. "Three Case Studies in Linked Open Data." Library Technology Reports, 2013(July): 26-43.
  28. RDA. 2017. RDA Element Sets. [인용 2017. 7. 15].
  29. Shieh, J. 2013. "A Transformative Opportunity: BIBFRAME at the George Washington University, an Early Experimenter." Information Standards Quarterly, 25(4): 17-21. https://doi.org/10.3789/isqv25no4.2013.04
  30. Taniguchi, Shoichi. 2017. "Examining BIBFRAME 2.0 from the Viewpoint of RDA Metadata Schema." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55(6): 387-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1322161
  31. Tharani, Karim. 2015. "Linked Data in Libraries: A Case Study of Harvesting and Sharing Bibliographic Metadata with BIBFRAME." Information Technology and Libraries, 2015(March): 5-19.
  32. Washington University Library. 2016. Mapping of RDA Core to BIBFRAME 2.0. [인용2017. 7. 15].
  33. Welsh, A. 2017. "From WEMI to WII: FRBR, BIBFRAME and the 21st Century Bibliographic Model." Catalogue and Index, 186: 20-29. [인용2017. 7. 15].