A Bibliometric Analysis of Citation Patterns in Conference Papers of Information Science

학술대회 논문의 참고자료 인용패턴 분석 - 정보과학 분야를 중심으로 -

  • 이다니엘 (상명대학교 공과대학 소프트웨어학과)
  • Received : 2017.10.16
  • Accepted : 2017.11.13
  • Published : 2017.11.30


This paper aims to explore the citation patterns of conference papers in 'Information Science' discipline and to analze impacts of various cited works-related factors on future citations of conference papers. Existing bibliometric studies has investigated citation patterns and the statistical relations between a variety of bibliographic factors and the future citations of literature. However, the attentions have been focused largely on journal articles, and the bibliometric studies targeting conference papers are still in an infant stage. Therefore, this study, which is based on 1,904 conference papers in 'Information Science' field, examined several citation patterns and the contributions of the factors about cited works - the number of cited works, type of cited works, citation rates and ages of cited works at the time of being cited and the rate of self-citedness - to the future citation of the citing target articles. The data source of this study including the properties of target articles and cited works and citation rates of target articles was Scopus. As the results, 53% and 29% of the cited works were conference papers and journal articles, respectively. 14% of them are non-traditional types such as web pages, technical reports, patent, etc. More than 60% of the cited works were 5 years old or less. Among several factors considered in this paper, the number of conference papers and the number of non-traditional types of works are the most contributing factors on the citation rates of target articles. The recency of the cited works is also significant contributor on the citation rates of target articles. That is, the target articles citing more conference papers and non-traditonal types of works earned more citations. The target articles citing recent works also earned more citations.


Citation Analysis;References;Bibliometric Analysis;Multiple Regressions;Conference Proceedings


  1. 김갑선. 2002. 참고문헌의 동시공존현상-한국 사회과학자들의 인용동기와 참고자료의 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 36(4): 21-47. (Kim, Kapseon. 2002. "An Analysis on the Citation Motivations and References by Social Scientists: The Co-occurrence Phenomenon of Both Korean and Non-Korean Literatures Within the Korean Reference." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(4): 21-47.)
  2. 김미라, 이응봉. 2013. 참고문헌 분석을 통한 국방과학 연구자들의 인용행태 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(2): 143-159. (Kim, Mi-Ra and Lee, Eung-Bong. 2013. "A Study on the Citing Behavior of Military Scientists by Reference Analysis." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(2): 143-159.)
  3. 오세훈. 2005. 우리나라 문헌정보학 학술지 논문 및 인용문헌 분석을 통한 연구동향 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(3): 379-408. (Oh, Se-Hoon. 2005. "A Study on the Research Trends of Library & Information Science in Korea by analyzing Journal articles and the Cited Literatures." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3): 379-408.)
  4. 조인숙, 한미숙. 2007. 문헌정보학분야 연구자들의 학술지 게재논문과 인용학술지 분석 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2): 89-105. (Cho, In-Sook and Han, Mi-Sook. 2007. "An Analysis on the Articles and Cited Journals Suggested by LIS Researchers of Korea." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 18(2): 89-105.)
  5. Antoniou, G. A. et al. 2015. "Bibliometric Analysis of Factors Predicting Increased Citations in the Vascular and Endovascular Literature." Annals of Vascular Surgery, 29(2): 286-292.
  6. Barbosa, S. D. J., Silveira, M. S. and Gasparini, I. 2017. "What Publications Metadata Tell Us about the Evolution of a Scientific Community: The Case of the Brazilian Human-Computer Interaction Conference Series." Scientometrics, 110(1): 275-300.
  7. Bartneck, C. and Hu, J. 2009. "Scientometric Analysis of the CHI Proceedings." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 04-09, 2009, Boston, MA, USA: 699-708.
  8. Biscaro, C. and Giupponi, C. 2014. "Co-Authorship and Bibliographic Coupling Network Effects on Citations." PLOS ONE, 9(6): e99502.
  9. Bornmann, L. et al. 2012. "Diversity, Value and Limitations of the Journal Impact Factor and Alternative Metrics." Rheumatology International, 32(7): 1861-1867.
  10. Chakraborty, T. et al. 2014. "Towards a Stratified Learning Approach to Predict Future Citation Counts." In Proceedings of the 14th A CM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, September 08-12, 2014: 351-360.
  11. Cohen, J. et al. 2013. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge.
  12. Didegah, F. and Thelwall, M. 2013. "Determinants of Research Citation Impact in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5): 1055-1064.
  13. Donner, P. 2016. "Enhanced Self-citation Detection by Fuzzy Author Name Matching and Complementary Error Estimates." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3): 662-670.
  14. Eckmann, M., Rocha, A. and Wainer, J. 2012. "Relationship Between High-Quality Journals and Conferences in Computer Vision." Scientometrics, 90(2): 617-630.
  15. Falagas, M. E. et al. 2013. "The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals." PLoS One, 8(2): e49476.
  16. Franceschet, M. 2010. "A Comparison of Bibliometric Indicators for Computer Science Scholars and Journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar." Scientometrics, 83(1): 243-258.
  17. Freyne, J. et al. 2010. "Relative Status of Journal and Conference Publications in Computer Science." Communications of the ACM, 53(11): 124-132.
  18. Harzing, A.-W. and Alakangas, S. 2016. "Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A Longitudinal and Cross-Disciplinary Comparison." Scientometrics, 106(2): 787-804.
  19. Keith, T. Z. 2014. Multiple Regression and Beyond: An Introduction to Multiple Regression and Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Routledge.
  20. Lariviere, V., Sugimoto, C. R. and Cronin, B. 2012. "A Bibliometric Chronicling of Library and Information Science's First Hundred Years." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5): 997-1016.
  21. Lisee, C., Lariviere, V. and Archambault, E. 2008. "Conference Proceedings as A Source of Scientific Information: A Bibliometric Analysis." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11): 1776-1784.
  22. Meho, L. I. and Yang, K. 2007. "Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science Versus Scopus and Google Scholar." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13): 2105-2125.
  23. Montesi, M. and Owen, J. M. 2008. "From Conference to Journal Publication: How Conference Papers in Software Engineering are Extended for Publication in Journals." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5): 816-829.
  24. Nederhof, M. J. 2006. "Bibliometric Monitoring of Research Performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review." Scientometrics, 66(1): 81-100.
  25. Onodera, N. and Yoshikane, F. 2015. "Factors Affecting Citation Rates of Research Articles." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4): 739-764.
  26. Sakr, S. and Alomari, M. 2012. "A Decade of Database Conferences: A Look Inside the Program Committees." Scientometrics, 91(1): 173-184.
  27. Schreiber, M. 2007. "Self-Citation Corrections for the Hirsch Index." EPL (Europhysics Letters), 78(3): 30002.
  28. Scopus. 2013. Scopus Content Coverage Guide. [online] [cited 2017. 9. 20.]
  29. Shirakawa, N. et al. 2012. "Global Competition and Technological Transition in Electrical, Electronic, Information and Communication Engineering: Quantitative Analysis of Periodicals and Conference Proceedings of the IEEE." Scientometrics, 91(3): 895-910.
  30. Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A. and Ahamdzadeh, K. 2016. "Factors Affecting Number of Citations: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature." Scientometrics, 107(3): 1195-1225.
  31. van Wesel, M., Wyatt, S. and ten Haaf, J. 2014. "What a Difference a Colon Makes: How Superficial Factors Influence Subsequent Citation." Scientometrics, 98(3): 1601-1615.
  32. Vardi, M. Y. 2010. "Revisiting the Publication Culture in Computing Research." Communications of the ACM, 53(3): 5.
  33. Vasilescu, B. et al. 2014. "How Healthy are Software Engineering Conferences?" Science of Computer Programming, 89(C): 251-272.
  34. Vrettas, G. and Sanderson, M. 2015. "Conferences Versus Journals in Computer Science." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12): 2674-2684.
  35. Wainer, J. and Valle, E. 2013. "What Happens to Computer Science Research after It Is Published? Tracking CS Research Lines." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(6): 1104-1111.
  36. Wainer, J., Przibisczki de Oliveira, H. and Anido, R. 2011. "Patterns of Bibliographic References in the ACM Published Papers." Information Processing & Management, 47(1): 135-142.
  37. Waltman, L. 2016. "A Review of the Literature on Citation Impact Indicators." Journal of Informetrics, 10(2): 365-391.
  38. Wuehrer, G. and Smejkal, A. 2013. "The Knowledge Domain of the Academy of International Business Studies (AIB) Conferences: A Longitudinal Scientometric Perspective for the Years 2006-2011." Scientometrics, 95(2): 541-561.
  39. Zhang, Y. and Jia, X. 2013. "Republication of Conference Papers in Journals?" Learned Publishing, 26(3): 189-196.