DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Sample Paper for Activism Archives

액티비즘 아카이브로서 동물권 운동 아카이브

  • 이윤희 (한국외국어대학교 대학원 정보.기록학과) ;
  • 이영학 (한국외국어대학교 대학원 정보.기록학과)
  • Received : 2017.10.15
  • Accepted : 2017.11.20
  • Published : 2017.11.30

Abstract

As the animal rights movement has recently gained recognition as a social movement that represents one of society's minorities, it is now creating a new social and political perspective in the Korean society. This paper explores animal rights through their activism archives. The principles of community archives that can be applied to the animal rights movement are organized into four categories, and how the principles work according to the types of archives. Among these, the activism archive was selected, and the social meaning and issues of the animal archive were examined. We reviewed the issues of the activism archive in the case of KARA.

References

  1. (사)동물보호시민단체카라 (2016). KARA 정기대의원총회자료집. 서울: (사)동물보호시민단체카라(Korea Animal Rights Advocates (2016). KARA General meeting of representatives. Seoul: Korea Animal Rights Advocates.)
  2. (사)동물보호시민단체카라, 강은엽, 공규동, 권희중, 김강석, 김영준, ... 허남결 (2013). 동물, 아는 만큼 보인다. 서울: (사)동물보호시민단체카라.(Korea Animal Rights Advocates, Kang Eun Yup, Gong Dong Kyu, Kwon Hee Jung, Kim Kang Suk, Kim YoungJun, ... Heo NamGyeol (2013). Animals, You can see as much as you know. Seoul: Korea Animal Rights Advocates.)
  3. 봉준호 (감독) (2017). 옥자 [영화]. 미국: 넷플릭스.(Bong Junho (Director) (2017). Okja [Movie]. United States of America: Netflix.)
  4. 설문원, 김영 (2016). 공동체 아카이브를 위한 기록 평가론의 재조명. 기록학연구, 48, 210-252.(Seol, Munwon & Kim, Yeong (2016). Revisiting Archical Appraisal Theories for their Application to Community Archives. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 48, 210-252.)
  5. 유선봉 (2008). 동물권 논쟁 - 철학적, 법학적 논의를 중심으로. 중앙법학, 10(2), 435-468.(Yoo, Seonbong (2008). Current Debates over Animal Rights, Focusing on Philosophical and Legal Arguments. CHUNG_ANG LAW REVIEW, 10(2), 435-468.)
  6. 유선봉 (2010). 현대적 동물권 운동과 동물해방전선에 관한 고찰. 법학논문집, 34(1), 231-261.(Yoo, Seonbong (2010). A Study on the Modern Animal Rights Movement and Animal Liberation Front. CHUNG-ANG JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES. 34(1), 231-261.)
  7. 유철인 (2004). 구술된 경험 읽기: 제주4.3관련 수형인 여성의 생애사. 한국문화인류학회지, 37(1), 3-39.(Yoo, Cheolin (2004). Reading the Experience as Told: A Life History of the Woman who Served the Sentence during Jeju April Third Uprising, KOREAN CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 37(1), 3-39.)
  8. 윤은하 (2012). 공동체와 공동체아카이브에 대한 고찰. 기록학연구, 33, 3-37.(Yun, Eunha (2012). Communities and community archives. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 33, 3-37.)
  9. 윤은하 (2016). 아키비스트의 객관성에 대한 재고찰 - 클리포드 기어츠(Clifford Geertz)의 인류학적 방법론을 통해. 기록학연구, 47, 131-159.(Yun, Eunha (2016). A Study on a Archivist's Objectivity Based on Clifford Geertz's anthropological Approach. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 47, 131-159.)
  10. 이승억 (2013). 경계 밖의 수용 - 보존기록학과 포스트모더니즘. 기록학연구, 38, 189-223.(Lee, Seungeok (2013). Accepting out of Boundary: Archival Science and the Impact of Postmodernism. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 38, 189-223.)
  11. 이영남 (2012). 공동체아카이브 몇 가지 단상. 기록학연구, 31, 3-42.(Lee, Yeongnam (2012). Some Possibities of Community Archivs. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 31, 3-42.)
  12. 이영숙 (2005). 시민단체 기록 분류방안 연구: 환경연합을 중심으로, 기록관리학회지, 5(2), 73-101.(Lee, Yeongsuk (2005). A Study on the Development of Classification Schemes for NGO Records. Journal of records management & archives society of Korea, 5(2), 73-101.)
  13. 이현정 (2014). 기록학 실천주의(Archival Activism)의 과제와 전망, 기록학연구, 42, 213-243.(Lee, Hyeonjeong (2014). The Prospects and Challenges of Archival Activism: Focusing on the Documentation Case of Occupy Wall Street Movement. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 42, 213-243.)
  14. 조은성 (2013). 기록학 패러다임 전환에 따른 기술에 관한 연구. 기록학연구, 37, 75-142.(Jo, Eunseong (2013). A Study on the Archival Description in according with Paradigm Shift of the Archival Sciences. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 37, 75-142.)
  15. 조중헌 (2013a). 활동가들의 경험을 통해 본 동물권운동의 의미변화 과정. 박사학위논문. 한양대학교 대학원.(Jo, Jungheon (2013a). A study on the social meaning of animal rights movement seen through the activists' experienes. doctoral dissertation. Hanyang University.)
  16. 조중헌 (2013b). 동물 옹호의 논의와 실천을 통해 본 물권 담론의 사회적 의미. 법학논총, 30(1), 111-131.(Jo, Jungheon (2013b). A Study on the Animal Rights Discourse Seen through the Social Discussion and Practice of Animal Advocacy. hanyang journal of law, 30(1), 111-131.)
  17. Cox, J. (2007). Industrial animal agriculture, part of the poverty problem.
  18. Crooke, E. (2010). The politics of community heritage: motivations, authority and control. Int J Herit Stud 16(1-2):16-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441705
  19. Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science, 14, 312.
  20. Dunbar, A. (2006). Introducing critical race theory to archival discourse: getting the conversation started. Arch Sci 6:109-129 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9022-6
  21. Kumbier A (2012) Inventing history: the Watermelon Womanand archive activism. In: Bly L, Wooten K (eds) Make your own history: documentingfeminist and queer activism in the 21st century. Litwin Books, Los Angeles, Quoted inToward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessonsfrom community archives. Archival Science, 14, 313.
  22. Flinn, A. & Stevens, M. (2009). 'It is nohmistri, wimekin history'. Telling our own story: independent and community archives in the UK, challenging and subverting the mainstream. In: Bastian J, Alexander B (eds) Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet, London, pp 3-28 Quoted in Michelle Caswell (2014). Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science, 14, 313.
  23. Flinn, A., Stevens, M., & Shepherd, E. (2009). Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Arch Sci 9:71-86 Quoted in Michelle Caswell (2014). Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science, 14, 311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2
  24. Michelle Caswell (2014). Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science, 14, 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
  25. Peter Singer (2012). 동물해방. (김성한 역). 경기: 연암서가 (원전 발행년 1975)(Peter Singer (2012). Animals Liberation. (Kim SungHan trans). Gyeonggi-do: Yeonamseoga (original publication year 1975).)
  26. Peter Singer, Matt Ball, Martin Balluch, paola Cavalieri, Marian Stamp Dawkins, ... Paul Waldau (2012). 동물과 인간이 공존해야 하는 합당한 이유들. (노승영 역). 서울: 시대의 창. (원전 발행년 2005).(Peter Singer, Matt Ball, Martin Balluch, paola Cavalieri, Marian Stamp Dawkins, …Paul Waldau (2012). In Defense of Animal Rights. (No SeungYeong trans). Seoul: Sidaeui Chang. (original publication year 2005).)
  27. Terry Cook (2013). Evidence, Memory, Identity, and Community: Four Shifting Archival Paradigms. Archival Science, 13, 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
  28. World Society for the Protection of Animals. Quoted in 조중헌 (2013a). 활동가들의 경험을 통해 본 동물권운동의 의미변화 과정. 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 137.(World Society for the Protection of Animals. Quoted in Jo, Jungheon (2013). A study on the social meaning of animal rights movement seen through the activists' experienes, Hanyang University, 137.)