A Quantitative Analysis of Scholarly Monograph Publishing by University Presses in Korea

국내 대학출판부의 학술단행본 출판에 대한 양적 분석

  • 심원식 (성균관대학교 문과대학 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 도슬기 (성균관대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이선애 (성균관대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2016.07.25
  • Accepted : 2016.08.08
  • Published : 2016.08.30


Scholarly monographs have been a main vehicle for knowledge representation and transfer as well as an important research outcome. University presses have long been considered as the last bastion for scholarly monographs that have low commercial prospect. Until now there has not been a systematic data analysis regarding scholarly monograph production by university presses in Korea. In this paper, we collected bibliographic records of university presses' monograph publications between 1950 and 2015 using the National Library of Korea's online catalog system. A total of 21,015 records were used in the analysis. In particular, for monographs published between 2001 and 2015, we categorized them into scholarly monographs and non-scholarly monographs. University presses' publishing showed sharp increase during the 1990's but is in decline after its peak in 2005. University presses seem to have engaged in publishing more non-scholarly monographs than scholarly monographs by a ratio of 6:4. Large university presses in size seem to produce higher proportions of scholarly monographs than smaller presses. In terms of authoring types, single authorship accounts for the highest proportion and on the increase. However, edited books are losing ground as translated books seem to hold steady. Monographs in social sciences have been published more frequently than any other subject areas as there seem to be significant discrepancies among subject areas in terms of the scholarly monograph proportion.


University Press;Scholarly Monograph;Scholarly Communication;Quantitative Analysis


  1. 국립중앙도서관. 국립중앙도서관 홈페이지. 서울: 국립중앙도서관. [online] [cited 2016. 4. 1.] National Library of Korea. National Library of Korea Homepage. Seoul: National Libraryof Korea. [online] [cited 2016. 4. 1.]
  2. 권영자. 2012. 한․일 대학출판부 출판 활동의 실증적 비교 연구. 한국출판학연구, 38(1): 5-31. Kwon, Youngja. 2012. "Comparative Empirical Study on the Publication Activities of Koreanand Japanese Universities: Focusing on Seoul National University Press and University ofTokyo Press." Korean Publishing Science Society, 38(1): 5-31.
  3. 출판전문가 중심으로 재편… 한국대학출판협회 역할 확대해야. 2015. 교수신문. 10월 6일. [online] [cited 2016. 5. 18.] "Reorganize around Publishing Experts … Expand the Role of the Association of KoreanUniversity Press." 2015. The Kyosu Shinmun. October 6th. [online] [cited 2016. 5. 18.]
  4. 대한출판문화협회. 1998. 국내 9개 대학출판부의 출판 활동. 출판저널, 240: 10-11. Korean Publishers Association. 1998. "Publishing Activities of Nine University Presses." TheKorean Publishing Journal, 240: 10-11.
  5. 박명희. 2006. 한국 대학 출판부의 역할과 기능에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 건국대학교 언론홍보 대학원. Park, Myung-Hee. 2006. A Study on the Role and Functions of University Press in Korea.M.A. thesis, Major in Publishing, Graduate School of Mass Communication and Public Pelations, Konkuk University, Korea.
  6. 박용두, 홍이현. 2005. 대학출판부, 그 새로운 출발을 위하여. 출판저널, 352: 36-38. Park, Yong-Du and Hong, Lee-Hyeon. 2005. "University Press for a New Start." The KoreanPublishing Journal, 352: 36-38.
  7. 송정숙. 1998. 학술정보전달시스템으로서 대학출판부의 활성화 방안: 부산대학교 출판부를 중심으로. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 28: 137-170. Song, Jung-Sook. 1998. "The Activation Program for the University Press as a ScholarlyCommunication System: The Case of the Pusan National University Press." Journal of KoreanLibrary and Information Science Society, 28: 137-170.
  8. 이영자. 1981. 학술정보 커뮤니케이션 시스템으로서의 대학출판부. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 8:155-184. Lee, Young-Ja. 1981. "The University Press as a Scholarly Communication System." Journalof Korean Library and Information Science Society, 8: 155-184.
  9. 인문학 연구성과 저술 중심으로 평가하자. 2014. 교수신문. 5월 12일. [online] [cited 2016. 5. 18.] "Changing Performance Assessment of Humanities Research based on Scholarly MonographPublication." 2014. The Kyosu Shinmun. May 12th. [online] [cited 2016. 5. 18.]
  10. 정연경, 최윤경. 2011. 인문․사회과학 분야 교수의 연구업적물 평가에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 42(3): 211-233. Chung, Yeon-Kyoung and Choi, Yoon-Kyung. 2011. "A Study on Faculty Evaluation ofResarch Achievements in Humanities and Social Sciences." Journal of Information Management, 42(3): 211-233.
  11. 한국대학출판부협회. 2011. 2010 대학출판부 연감 / 신간도서목록. 서울: 한국대학출판부협회.Association of Korean University Presses. 2011. 2010 University Press Annual Book / Listof New Publications. Seoul: Association of Korean University Press.
  12. 한국연구재단. 2014. 인문학분야 학술성과 평가의 표준모델에 관한 연구. 대전: 한국연구재단, 정책연구-2013-013-인문학.National Research Foundation. 2014. A Study on the Standard Model for Research PerformanceEvaluation in the Humanities. Daejeon: National Research Foundation.
  13. Borgman, C. L. 2007. Scholarship in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  14. Brown, L. et al. 2007. "University Publishing in a Digital Age." Journal of Electronic Publishing, 10(3): 1-69.
  15. Campbell, R., Pentz, E. and Borthwick, I. 2012. Academic and Professional Publishing. Burlington:Elsevier.
  16. Duke University. 2015. Duke University Books & Journals: Fall & Winter 2015. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 5.]
  17. Griffiths, R. J. and Rascoff, M. 2005. The Evolving Environment for Scholarly Electronic Monographs. New York: Ithaka S+R. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 19.]
  18. Gould, C. C. 1988. Information Needs in the Humanities: An Assessment. CA: Research Libraries Group.
  19. Kivisto, S. and Kihlstrom, S. 2015. The Monograph. Helsingfors: University of Helsinki. [online] [cited 2016. 4. 5.]
  20. Schonfeld, R. C., Housewright, R. and Wulfson, K. 2012. Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2012. New York: Ithaka S+R. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 5.]
  21. Schonfeld, R. C. 2013. Stop the Presses: Is the Monograph Headed toward an E-Only Future. New York: Ithaka S+R. [online] [cited 2016. 5. 18.]
  22. Steele, C. 2008. "Scholarly Monograph Publishing in the 21st Century: The Future More than Ever Should Be an Open Book." Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(2). [online] [cited 2016. 4. 5.] doi:
  23. University College London. 2008. Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future. [online] [cited 2016. 4. 18.]
  24. Withey, L. et al. 2011. "Sustaining Scholarly Publishing: New Business Models for University Presses: A Report of the AAUP Task Force on Economic Models for Scholarly Publishing." Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42(4): 397-441.