DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Attitude Confidence and User Resistance for Purchasing Wearable Devices on Virtual Reality: Based on Virtual Reality Headgears

가상현실 웨어러블 기기의 구매 촉진을 위한 태도 자신감과 사용자 저항 태도: 가상현실 헤드기어를 중심으로

  • Sohn, Bong-Jin (Department of Tourism Management, Global Business School, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Park, Da-Sul (Department of International Cultural Studies, College of Humanities, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Choi, Jaewon (Department of Business Administration, Soonchunhyang University)
  • 손봉진 (순천향대학교 관광경영학과) ;
  • 박다슬 (순천향대학교 국제문화학과) ;
  • 최재원 (순천향대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2016.08.17
  • Accepted : 2016.09.24
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been a rapid diffusion of technological devices and a rising number of various devices, resulting in an escalation of virtual reality technology. Technological market has rapidly been changed from smartphone to wearable devices based on virtual reality. Virtual reality can make users feel real situation through sensing interaction, voice, motion capture and so on. Facebook.com, Google, Samsung, LG, Sony and so on have investigated developing platform of virtual reality. the pricing of virtual reality devices also had decreased into 30% from their launched period. Thus market infrastructure in virtual reality have rapidly been developed to crease marketplace. However, most consumers recognize that virtual reality is not ease to purchase or use. That could not lead consumers to positive attitude for devices and purchase the related devices in the early market. Through previous studies related to virtual reality, there are few studies focusing on why the devices for virtual reality stayed in early stage in adoption & diffusion context in the market. Almost previous studies considered the reasons of hard adoption for innovative products in the viewpoints of Typology of Innovation Resistance, MIR(Management of Innovation Resistant), UTAUT & UTAUT2. However, product-based antecedents also important to increase user intention to purchase and use products in the technological market. In this study, we focus on user acceptance and resistance for increasing purchase and usage promotions of wearable devices related to virtual reality based on headgear products like Galaxy Gear. Especially, we added a variables like attitude confidence as a dimension for user resistance. The research questions of this study are follows. First, how attitude confidence and innovativeness resistance affect user intention to use? Second, What factors related to content and brand contexts can affect user intention to use? This research collected data from the participants who have experiences using virtual rality headgears aged between 20s to 50s located in South Korea. In order to collect data, this study used a pilot test and through making face-to-face interviews on three specialists, face validity and content validity were evaluated for the questionnaire validity. Cleansing the data, we dropped some outliers and data of irrelevant papers. Totally, 156 responses were used for testing the suggested hypotheses. Through collecting data, demographics and the relationships among variables were analyzed through conducting structural equation modeling by PLS. The data showed that the sex of respondents who have experience using social commerce sites (male=86(55.1%), female=70(44.9%). The ages of respondents are mostly from 20s (74.4%) to 30s (16.7%). 126 respondents (80.8%) have used virtual reality devices. The results of our model estimation are as follows. With the exception of Hypothesis 1 and 7, which deals with the two relationships between brand awareness to attitude confidence, and quality of content to perceived enjoyment, all of our hypotheses were supported. In compliance with our hypotheses, perceived ease of use (H2) and use innovativeness (H3) were supported with its positively influence for the attitude confidence. This finding indicates that the more ease of use and innovativeness for devices increased, the more users' attitude confidence increased. Perceived price (H4), enjoyment (H5), Quantity of contents (H6) significantly increase user resistance. However, perceived price positively affect user innovativeness resistance meanwhile perceived enjoyment and quantity of contents negatively affect user innovativeness resistance. In addition, aesthetic exterior (H6) was also positively associated with perceived price (p<0.01). Also projection quality (H8) can increase perceived enjoyment (p<0.05). Finally, attitude confidence (H10) increased user intention to use virtual reality devices. however user resistance (H11) negatively affect user intention to use virtual reality devices. The findings of this study show that attitude confidence and user innovativeness resistance differently influence customer intention for using virtual reality devices. There are two distinct characteristic of attitude confidence: perceived ease of use and user innovativeness. This study identified the antecedents of different roles of perceived price (aesthetic exterior) and perceived enjoyment (quality of contents & projection quality). The findings indicated that brand awareness and quality of contents for virtual reality is not formed within virtual reality market yet. Therefore, firms should developed brand awareness for their product in the virtual market to increase market share.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Abdullah, N., S. A. Ismail, S. Sophiayati and S. M. Sam, "Data Quality in Big Data: A Review", Int. J. Advance Soft Compu. Appl, Vol.7, No.3(2015), 17-27.
  2. Bae J. H. and H. Y. Noh, "An experimental study of the effects of learning on driving simulation game in Virtual environment.", Korean Study For Computer Game, Vol.28, No.2(2015), 103-111.
  3. Bataineth, A. Q., "The Impact of Perceived e-WOM on Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Corporate Image", International Journal of Marketing Studies, Vol.7, No.1(2015), 126-137.
  4. Baumgartner, H. and E. M. Steenkamp, "Exploratory Consumer Buying Behavior: Conceptualization and Measurement," International Journal of Research, Vol.10 (1973), 184-190.
  5. Bian, Q. and S. Forsythe, "Purchase Intention for Luxury Brands: A Cross Cultural Comparison", Journal of Business Research, Vol.65(2012), 1443-1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.010
  6. Cha, J., "Exploring the Internet as a Unique Shopping Channel to Sell Both Real and Virtual Items: A Comparison of Factors Affecting Purchase Intention and Consumer Characteristics," Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.12, No.2(2011), 115-132.
  7. Choi, J., H. Lee, F. Sajjad and H. Lee, "The Influence of National Culture on the Attitude Towards Mobile Recommender Systems," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol.86(2014).
  8. Davis, F. D., "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.3(1989), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  9. Handayanto, A. J., "Analysis of Consumer Awareness on Twitter Communication and Brand Equity of Bear Brand Milk," Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.5, No.2(2016), 348-356. https://doi.org/10.17722/jorm.v5i2.122
  10. Ho, S. Y. and B. David, "The Effects of Web Personalization on User Attitude and Behavior: An Integration of the Elaboration Likelihood Model and Consumer Search Theory," MIS Quarterly, Vol.38, No.2(2014), A1-A10. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.01
  11. Jia, S., "Social Comparison, Social Presence, And Enjoyment in the Acceptance of social Shopping Websites," Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.13, No.3(2012), 198-212.
  12. Joseph, B. and S. J. Vyas, "Concurrent Validity of a Measure of Innovative Cognitive Style," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.12, No.2(1984), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729494
  13. Khalifa, M., N Cheong, S. K. and Shen N. K., "Adoption of mobile commerce: a confidence model," Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol.53, No.1, 14-22.
  14. Kim B. H., "A study on Business Strategies of VR(Virtual Reality) Contents at Broadcasting Networks," Mass Communication & Public Relations of Konkuk University, 2015, 1-98.
  15. Kim, Y. and J. Lee, "The Psychological Resistance Factors against Mobile Video Telephony," Journal of Marketing Management Research, Vol.15, No.2(2010), 23-41.
  16. Lee, K. H. and D. Shin, "Consumers' Responses to CSR Activities: The Linkage between Increased Awareness and Purchase Intention", Public Relations Review(2010), 1-4.
  17. Lisa, B. F., "Effects of Video Game Streming on Consumer Attitudes and Behaviors," East Tennessee State University, 2016, 1-55.
  18. Ma Y. S., D. Y. Won and S. H. Park, "Moderating Effect of Consumer Innovativeness on Relationship between Sportwearable Device's Innovation Attribute and Innovation Resistance of College Students," Korean Journal of Sport Science, Vol.26, No.4(2015), 861-873. https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2015.26.4.861
  19. Madhikermi, M., S. Kubler, J. Robert, A. Buda and K. Framling, "Data Qulity Assement of Maintenance Reporting Procedures," Preprint submitted to Elsevier, 2016, 1-23.
  20. Marins, C., "Exploring Digital Music Online: User Acceptance and Adoption of Online Music Services," Instituto Superior de Economia Gestao, 2013.
  21. Melody, M. T., S. C. Ho and T. P. Liang, "Consumer Attitude toward Mobile Advertising: An Empirical Study", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol.8, No.3(2004), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2004.11044301
  22. Nicolaou, A. I. and D. H. Mcknight, "Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchages: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use," Information Systems Research, Vol.17, No.4(2006), 332-351. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0103
  23. Park H. J., J. W. Choi and K. S. Shin, "Innovation resistance and adoption regarding a virtual reality motionsensing input device," The Knwoledge Management Society of Korea, Vol.16, No.4(2015), 191-213.
  24. Park H. J., K. S. Shin and J. W. Choi, "A Multi-dimensional Structure for User Resistance with the Determinants of Innovative Product Use on Virtual Reality", The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, Vol21, No.2(2016), 97-119.
  25. Park H. H. and M. J. Noh, "The Influence of Product Attribute of Smart Clothing on Initial Trust and Purchase Intention: Focused on Sensor-Based Smart Clothing," The Korean Academy of Family Medicine, Vol.49, No.6(2011), 13-22.
  26. Petty, R. E., Z. L. Tormala and P. Brinol, "Thought Confidence as a Determinant of Persuasion: The Self-Validation Hypothesis," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.82, No.5(2002), 722-741. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.722
  27. Ram, S., "A Model of Innvation Resistance," In Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.14 (1987), 208-212.
  28. Ram, S. and J. N. Sheth, "Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and Its Solutions," Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.6, No.2(1989), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002542
  29. Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of Innovations(5th Ed.), The Free Press, New York, 2003.
  30. Schlosser, A. E., "Experiencing Products in the Virtual World: The Role of Goal and Imagery in Influencing Attitudes Versus Purchase Intentions," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.30(2003), 184-198. https://doi.org/10.1086/376807
  31. Sheth, J. N., "Psychology of Innovation Resistance: The Less Developed Concept (LDC) in Diffusion Research," Research in Marketing, Vol.4, No.3(1981), 273-282.
  32. Shuai X., S. J. Lee and K. R. Lee, "Chinese User Resistance of Mobile Payment," Journal of Information Technology and Architecture, Vol.12, No.2(2015), 219-227.
  33. So Y. H., "Relationship with Educational Effects and Medium Characteristics in Virtual Reality Learning based on Immersion Gear VR," Communication Design Assosition of Korea, Vol.24(2016), 226-237.
  34. Thomas, P. N. and L. H. Donna, "Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach," Marketing Science, Special Issue, 1999, 1-37.
  35. Venkatesh, V., James, Y. L. Thong and X. Xin, "Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead," Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol.17, No.5(2016), 329-376.
  36. Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis and F. D. Davis, "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View," MIS Quarterly, Vol.27, No.3(2003), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  37. Wu, S. and Chen, Y., "The Impact of Green Marketing and Perceived Innovation on Purchase Intention for Green Products," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Vol.6, No.5(2014), 81-100.
  38. Yun S. U., "A study of integrative adoption model regarding social TV: Focused on integrative approach on intention of continuous use based on innovation diffusion theory, technology acceptance model and innovation resistance model", The Journal of Press Science, Vol.16, No.2(2016), 145-183.
  39. Zhu, A. Y., M. v. Zedtwitz, D. Assimakopoulos and K. Fernandes, "The Impact of Organizational Culture on Concurrent Engineering, Design-for-Safety, and Product Safety Performance," International Journal Production Economics, Vol.176(2016), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.007