DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of thoracic epidurography and correlating factors affecting the extent of contrast medium spread

  • Hong, Ji Hee (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, School of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Jung Hue (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Ki Bum (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.08.08
  • Accepted : 2016.09.01
  • Published : 2016.10.01

Abstract

Background: Thoracic epidural anesthesia is frequently used to maintain intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Frequently, 3 ml of local anesthetic is used as a test dose, or for intermittent epidural injection. We assessed the extent of the spread of 3 ml of contrast medium in the thoracic epidural space and attempted to identify any correlating factors affecting the epidurography. Methods: A total of 70 patients were enrolled in the study, and thoracic epidural catheterizations were performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Using 3 ml of contrast medium, epidurography was evaluated to confirm the number of spinal segments covered by the contrast medium. Correlation analysis was performed between patient characteristics (sex, age, body mass index, weight, height, and location of catheter tip) and the extent of the contrast spread. Results: The mean number of vertebral segments evaluated by contrast medium was $7.9{\pm}2.2$ using 3 ml of contrast medium. The contrast spread in the cranial direction showed more extensive distribution than that in the caudal direction, with statistical significance (P < 0.01). Patient height demonstrated a negative correlation with the extent of distribution of contrast medium (r = -0.311, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Thoracic epidurography using 3 ml of contrast medium results in coverage of a mean of $7.9{\pm}2.2$ spinal segments, with more extensive cranial spread, and patient height showed a weak negative correlation with the distribution of contrast medium.

References

  1. Zhang D, Fujiwara R, Iseri T, Nagahama S, Kakishima K, Kamata M, et al. Distribution of contrast medium epidurally injected at thoracic and lumbar vertebral segments. J Vet Med Sci 2013; 75: 663-6. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.11-0276
  2. Gessler F, Mutlak H, Tizi K, Senft C, Setzer M, Seifert V, et al. Postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia in patients with spondylodiscitis and posterior spinal fusion surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 24: 965-70. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15415
  3. Nishimori M, Low JH, Zheng H, Ballantyne JC. Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012: CD005059.
  4. Popping DM, Elia N, Marret E, Remy C, Tramer MR. Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 2008; 143: 990-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.10.990
  5. Kim SH, Yoon KB, Yoon DM, Kim CM, Shin YS. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl: experience with 2,276 surgical patients. Korean J Pain 2013; 26: 39-45. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.39
  6. Park SK, Choi YS, Choi SW, Song SW. A comparison of three methods for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Korean J Pain 2015; 28: 45-51. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.1.45
  7. Windisch O, Heidegger CP, Giraud R, Morel P, Buhler L. Thoracic epidural analgesia: a new approach for the treatment of acute pancreatitis? Crit Care 2016; 20: 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1292-7
  8. Visser WA, Lee RA, Gielen MJ. Factors affecting the distribution of neural blockade by local anesthetics in epidural anesthesia and a comparison of lumbar versus thoracic epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 708-21. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817e7065
  9. Yokoyama M, Hanazaki M, Fujii H, Mizobuchi S, Nakatsuka H, Takahashi T, et al. Correlation between the distribution of contrast medium and the extent of blockade during epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 1504-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200406000-00024
  10. Kim YC, Lim YJ, Lee SC. Spreading pattern of epidurally administered contrast medium in rabbits. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42: 1092-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05382.x
  11. Iwata Y, Hamai Y, Koyama T. Anesthetic management of nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using epidural anesthesia and dexmedetomidine in three patients with severe respiratory dysfunction. J Anesth 2016; 30: 324-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-015-2122-9
  12. Kim KS, Shin SS, Kim TS, Jeong CY, Yoon MH, Choi JI. Fluoroscopically guided cervical interlaminar epidural injections using the midline approach: an analysis of epidurography contrast patterns. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 1658-61. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31819d107b
  13. Huang CH. Effect of cervical epidural blockade with 2% lidocaine plus epinephrine on respiratory function. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2007; 45: 217-22.
  14. Groeben H. Epidural anesthesia and pulmonary function. J Anesth 2006; 20: 290-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-006-0425-6
  15. Lee CJ, Jeon Y, Lim YJ, Bahk JH, Kim YC, Lee SC, et al. The influence of neck flexion and extension on the distribution of contrast medium in the high thoracic epidural space. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 1583-6. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000264006.46379.28
  16. Saitoh K, Hirabayashi Y, Shimizu R, Mitsuhata H, Fukuda H. Extensive extradural spread in the elderly may not relate to decreased leakage through intervertebral foramina. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 688-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/75.6.688
  17. Igarashi T, Hirabayashi Y, Shimizu R, Saitoh K, Fukuda H, Mitsuhata H. The lumbar extradural structure changes with increasing age. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 149-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/78.2.149
  18. Wu HT, Schweitzer ME, Parker L. Is epidural fat associated with body habitus? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 99-102. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rct.0000150139.87154.97