DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of User Preferences for Developing FRBR-Based Information Search Services

FRBR형 검색서비스 개발을 위한 이용자 선호도 분석

  • 이은주 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2016.05.20
  • Accepted : 2016.06.17
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

The purposes of this research is designing an FRBR-based information search services based on users' needs and behaviors. Regarding this matter, this study first extensively analysed literature related to the FRBR Model. On that basis, this study categorized foreign cases by application methods of FRBR Model, and identified their characteristics. Also this study analysed how Korean users evaluated the FRBR-based information search services. Afterwards, this study discussed the overall development direction before we develop the FRBR search service in earnest. In those terms, this study selected four types of FRBR-based search services(FictionFinder, AustLit, Perseus Digital Library, Virtua) and analysed each Model's application method. Finally, this study analysed user preference of the categorization using four undergraduate and four postgraduate students of the Department of Library and Information Science.

References

  1. 김소형. 2005. 영화정보를 위한 FRBR 모형 메타데이터 시스템 구현에 관한 연구. 박사학위 논문. 성균관대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과.(Kim, Sohyeong. 2005. A Study on the Developing of Metadata System Based on FRBR Model for the Information of Motion Pictures. Ph. D. diss., Sungkyunkwan University.)
  2. 김정현. 2013. 한국목록규칙의 개정 방향에 대한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 44(4): 123-143.(Kim, Jeong-Hyen. 2013. "A Study on the Direction for the Revision of Korean Cataloguing Rules." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(4): 123-143.)
  3. 김정현, 이성숙, 이유정. 2015. KORMARC 서지레코드의 FRBR 알고리즘 개발에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 46(1): 1-23.(Kim, Jeong-Hyen, Sung-Sook Lee and You-Jeong Lee. 2015. "A Study on the Development of FRBR Algorithm for KORMARC Bibliographic Record." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(1): 1-23.)
  4. 김현희. 2007. FRBR 모형 기반 서지검색시스템의 검색 효율성 평가 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 38(3): 223-246.(Kim, Hyun-Hee. 2007. "An Experimental Study on the Retrieval Efficiency of the FRBR Based Bibliographic Retrieval System." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(3): 223-246.)
  5. 김현희, 유영준, 박서은. 2007. FRBR 모형의 KORMARC 데이터베이스로의 적용 가능성에 대한 실험적 연구-음악자료를 중심으로. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 38(2): 185-202.(Kim, Hyun-hee, Yeong-Jun Yoo and Suh-Eun Park. 2007. "An Experimental Study on the FRBR Model Adaptation to KORMARC Database : Focusing on Music Materials." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(2): 185-202.)
  6. 노지현. 2007. 한국의 도서관 환경에서 FRBR 모델의 의미. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 38(2): 223-244.(Rho, Jee-Hyun. 2007. "Mean in gs o f FRBR Model i n Korean Library Circumstan ce." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(2): 223-244.)
  7. 노지현. 2008. KORMARC 레코드에 대한 FRBR 모델의 적용 실험. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 39(2): 291-312.(Rho, Jee-Hyun. 2008. "An Application of FRBR Model to KORMARC Records." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(2): 291-312.)
  8. 노지현. 2015. 국립중앙도서관 서지데이터의 FRBR 구현을 위한 방안 연구. 서울: 국립중앙도서관.
  9. 도태현. 2015. 한국목록규칙 4판 개정판의 구성 방안 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 46(4): 207-226.(Doh, Tae-Hyeon. 2015. "Suggestions for the Composition of KCR4 Revision." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(4): 207-226.)
  10. 박진희. 2009. RDA의 제정동향 및 내용구조에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 40(1): 317-338.(Park, Jin-Hee. 2009. "A Study on Movements to Establish RDA and Its Contents Structure." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(1): 317-338.)
  11. 서은경. 2006. FRBR 모형에 기반한 서지정보 인터페이스 개발에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4): 317-339.(Seo, EunGyong. 2006. "A Study on the Development of Bibliographic Interface Based on the FRBR Model." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(4): 317-339.) https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.317
  12. 이미화. 2012. 국제목록원칙 2009 제정에 따른 한국목록규칙의 방향성에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(2): 261-280.(Lee, Mihwa. 2012. The Study on the Directions of KCR4 under the New ICP 2009. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(2): 261-280.)
  13. 이성숙. 2006. FRBR 모형의 적용 전략에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2): 305-331.(Lee, Sung-Sook. 2006. "A Study on the Application Strategies of the FRBR model: Focused on Foreign Countries." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(2): 305-331.)
  14. 이은주. 2014. 이용자 요구 기반의 도서관목록 구현에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 48(3): 431-458.(Lee, Eun-Ju. 2014. "Redesign of OPAC based on College Students' Information Needs : The Case of P University Library." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(3): 431-458.)
  15. 정진규. 2007. 방송영상자료의 FRBR기반 서지구조모형에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(1): 185-214.(Chung, Jin-Gyoo. 2007. "A Study on Modeling of Bibliographic Framework Based on FRBR for Television Program Materials." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(1): 185-214.) https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.1.185
  16. 조재인. 2009. RDA 구현 시나리오와 서지 제어의 장래에 대한 고찰. 한국문헌정보학회지, 43(3): 85-105.(Cho, Jane. 2009. "A Study for RDA Implementation Scenarios and Future Bibliographic Control." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(3): 85-105.)
  17. Rosenfeld, Louis and Peter Morvill. 2003. 인포메이션 아키텍처. 남상신 옮김. 서울: 한빛미디어.
  18. Ayres, Marie-Louise et al. 2002. "Report on the Successful AustLit: Australian Literature Gateway Implementation of the FRBR and INDECS Event Models, and Implications for Other FRBR Implementations." International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control, 32(1): 1-9.
  19. Floyd, Ingbert. 2009. "Multiple Interpretations: Implications of FRBR as a Boundary Object." [cited 2016. 4. 25].
  20. Hickey, Thomas B., Edward T. O'Neill and Jenny Toves. 2002. "Experiments with the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records(FRBR)." D-Lib Magazine, 8(9) [cited 2016. 4. 20].
  21. Kapor, Mitchell. 1991. "Software design manifesto." Dr. Dobb's Journal, 16(1): 62-67.
  22. Madison, Olivia M. A. 2000. "The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: International Standards for Universal Bibliographic Control." Library Resources and Technical Services, 44(3): 153-159. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.44n3.153
  23. Maki, Uskali. 2001. "Models, Metaphors, Narrative, and Rhetoric: philosophical aspects." in International Encyclopedia of the social & Behavioral science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  24. Mercun, Tanja et al. 2013. Creating better library information systems: the road to FRBR-land. [cited 2016. 4. 25].
  25. Nielsen, Jakob. 1993. Usability Engineering, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
  26. Nielson, Jakob. 2000. Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. [cited 2016. 4. 25].
  27. OCLC. 2005. Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources [cited 2016. 4. 20].
  28. Powers, Heather and Dianne Coan, 2013. "RDA and FRBR... Tell me again why I care?" [cited 2016. 4. 20].
  29. Taniguchi, Shoichi. 2012. "Viewing RDA from FRBR and FRAD: does RDA represent a different conceptual model?" Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50: 929-943. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.712631
  30. Tillett, Barbara B. 2005. "FRBR and Cataloging for the Future." Cataloging & Classification Quaterly, 39(3/4): 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v39n03_12
  31. Vizine-Goetz, Diane. 2004. "FictionFinder: a FRBR works-based prototype." ALA Annual Conference. [cited 2016. 4. 20].
  32. Zhang, Yin, Athena Salaba. 2009. "What is Next for FRBR? A Delphi Study." The Library Quarterly, 79(2): 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1086/597078
  33. Zhang, Yin, Athena Salaba. 2012. "What do users tell us about FRBR-Based catalogs?" Cataloging & Classification Quaterly, 50: 705-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682000