# 전력부문 수소에너지 도입의 경제 및 에너지부문 파급효과

• Accepted : 2016.08.11
• Published : 2016.08.31
• 38 15

#### Abstract

The transition from a carbon economy based on fossil fuels to a hydrogen economy is necessary to ensure energy security and to combat climate change. In order to pursue the transition to a hydrogen economy while achieving sustainable economic growth, a preliminary study into the establishment of the necessary infrastructure for the future hydrogen economy needs to be carried out. This study addresses the economic and environmental interactions in a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model focusing on the economic effects of the introduction of renewable energy into the Korean energy system. Firstly, the introduction of hydrogen results in an increase in the investment in hydrogen production and the reduction of the production cost, ultimately leading to GDP growth. Secondly, the mandatory introduction of renewable energy and associated government subsidies bring about a reduction in total demand. Additionally, the mandatory introduction of hydrogen energy into the power sector helps to reduce CO2 emissions through the transition from a carbon economy-based on fossil energy to a hydrogen economy. This means that hydrogen energy needs to come from non-fossil fuel sources in order for greenhouse gases to be effectively reduced. Therefore, it seems necessary for policy support to be strengthened substantially and for additional studies to be conducted into the production of hydrogen energy from renewable sources.

#### Keywords

Emissions Trading;Regional General Equilibrium Modeling;Economic Welfare;GDP;Hydrogen energy

#### References

1. Hourcade, J.-C., Jaccard, M., Bataille, C., Gershi, F., "Hybrid modeling: new answers to old challenges," Energy Journal-Special Issue, pp.1-12, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/23297043
2. Bahn, O., Kypreos, S., Bueler, B., Luethi, H.J., "Modelling an international market of $CO_2$ emission permits," International Journal of Global Energy Issues 12, pp.283-291, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.1999.000825 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.1999.000825
3. Messner, S., Schrattenholzer, L., "MESSAGE-MACRO: linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving iteratively," Energy-The International Journal 25(3), pp.267-282, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0360-5442(99)00063-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(99)00063-8
4. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Galeotti, M., Massetti, E., Tavoni, M., "WITCH: a world induced technical change hybrid model," Energy Journal-Special Issue, pp.13-38, 2006.
5. Bohringer, C., "The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling," Energy Economics 20 (3), pp.233-248, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(97)00015-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(97)00015-7
6. Schumacher, K., Sands, R.D., "Innovative energy technologies and climate policy in Germany". Energy Policy 34 (18), pp.3939-3941, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.022
7. Bohringer, C., Rutherford T.F., "Combining bottom-up and top-down," Energy Economics 30(2), pp.574-596, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.03.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.03.004
8. Katrin Springer, The DART General Equilibrium Model: A Technical Description, Kiel Working Paper no. 883, 1998.

#### Acknowledgement

Supported by : Yeungnam University