# 정수압에 의존하는 항복기준의 강도정수 비교연구

• Accepted : 2016.07.07
• Published : 2016.07.31

#### Abstract

In this theoretical study, the strength parameters of the Drucker-Prager yield criterion and Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion were set to equal values, in order to analyze the correlation among the parameters. The Drucker-Prager strength parameters ${\alpha}$ and k were represented by the Mohr-Coulomb strength parameters c and ${\phi}$. Specifically it can be seen that k is function of c, ${\phi}$ and ${\alpha}$ is function of ${\phi}$ alone. Drucker-Prager strength parameter ${\alpha}$ increases as the internal friction angle of soil increases. ${\alpha}_{av}$ which is the average of ${\alpha}_c$ and ${\alpha}_i$ was proportional to internal friction angle in which ${\alpha}_c$ and ${\alpha}_i$ are ${\alpha}$ values corresponding to the circles of the Drucker-Prager yield cirteria circumscribes and inscribes the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion respectively. The values of the ${\alpha}_{av}$ was 0.07 and 0.29 which correspond to the internal friction angle of $10^{\circ}$ and $45^{\circ}$ respectively. In addition, value of ${\alpha}_c/{\alpha}_i$ was proportional to internal friction angle of soil and the values of ${\alpha}_c/{\alpha}_i$ 1.12 and 1.62 which corresponds to internal friction angle of $10^{\circ}$ and $45^{\circ}$ respectively.The influence of the Mohr-Coulomb strength parameters on the Drucker-Prager strength parameter k was investigated and it was found that k was mainly influenced by the cohesion of the soil, except in the case of the minimum assumed value of c of 10kPa. The deviator stresses, $S_{c0}$ and $S_{t0}$, which correspond to the cases of the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion under uniaxial compression and uniaxial tension, respectively, and $S_{0(ave)}$, which is the average value of $S_{c0}$ and $S_{t0}$, decrease as the internal friction angle increases. Furthermore, the hexagon, which represents the Mohr-Coulomb yield locus, becomes more irregular, and the deviations of $S_{c0}$ and $S_{t0}$ from $S_{0(ave)}$ also increase, as the internal friction angle increases.

#### References

1. Tresca, H., Memoire sur l'ecoulement des corps solides soumis a de fortes pressions. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 59, p. 754, 1864.
2. von Mises, R., Mechanik der festen Korper im plastisch deformablen Zustand. Gottin. Nachr. Math. Phys., vol. 1, pp.582-592, 1913.
3. Taylor, G. I. and Quinney, H., The latent energy remaining in a metal after cold working, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat. 143:849, p.307-326, 1934. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1934.0004
4. Fung, Y.C., Foundations of Solid Mechanics, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1965.
5. Drucker, D. C. and Prager, W., Soil mechanics and plastic analysis for limit design. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 157-165, 1952. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/48291
6. Haigh, Bernard Parker, "Strain-energy Function and the Elastic-limit". Report of the Eighty-Seventh Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 9-13 September 1919, Bournemouth. London: John Murray. pp. 486-495, 1920.
7. Westergaard HM, On the resistance of ductile materials to combined stresses. J Franklin Inst., 189, pp. 627-640, 1920. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-0032(20)90373-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-0032(20)90373-3
8. Coulomb, C. A., Mem. Math. et Phys., 7, p.343, 1773.