Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility of Broken Rice Fed to Postweaned Piglets with or without Multicarbohydrase and Phytase Supplementation

  • Dadalt, J.C. (Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Gallardo, C. (Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Polycarpo, G.V. (Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Budino, F.E.L. (Animal Science Institute, IZ) ;
  • Rogiewicz, A. (Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba) ;
  • Berto, D.A. (Department of Animal Science, UNESP) ;
  • Trindade Neto, M.A. (Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, University of Sao Paulo)
  • Received : 2015.10.20
  • Accepted : 2016.03.04
  • Published : 2016.10.01


Most of amino acid (AA) digestibility values for feed ingredients are obtained using pigs cannulated in the distal ileum. The ileal-cannulated pig model uses pigs older than six weeks due to difficulties related to implanting the T-cannula in distal ileum of younger pigs and complications during the post-surgical recovery. However, to properly formulate the diet of weaned pigs, the nutritive value of feed ingredients should be determined with younger pigs. Thus, 25 weaned pigs were used to determine the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients, energy, and apparent ileal digestibility (AID) and standardized ileal digestibility (SID) ileal AA digestibility of broken rice (BR), with or without multicarbohydrase (MC) and phytase (Phy) supplementation. Piglets were weaned at 23 d of age and individually housed in digestibility cages until 45 d of age. The trial consisted of 7 d of adaptation to the experimental diets and 3 d of excreta (feces and urine) collection. Ileal digesta was collected at slaughter (about 6 weeks of age). A completely randomized experimental design was used to determine the effects of MC and Phy. Reference diets (RD, 5% casein) was replaced by 30% of BR with or without MC, Phy, or MC+Phy. The RD was used to quantify endogenous AA losses. BR with Phy supplied had increased the ATTD of dry matter (p<0.05) and SID of histidine (p = 0.05), arginine, leucine, lysine, valine, alanine, and proline (p<0.05). BR with MC had been increased digestible energy and protein and SID for histidine (p<0.05). There was no interaction between Phy and MC on the BR nutrient digestibilities. Standardized amino acid digestibilities of BR, without enzymes, were lower than those values reported in the literature. The MC and Phy improved the digestibility of some nutrients and energy of BR in post-weaned piglet diets.


Amino Acids Digestibility;Broken Rice;Exogenous Enzymes;Metabolism;Nutrient Balance;Weaned Pigs


Supported by : The Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)


  1. Fireman, F. A. T. and A. K. B. A. T. Fireman. 1998. Enzymes in pig diets. Ciencia Rural 28:173-178.
  2. Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, USA.
  3. Hongtrakul, K., R. D. Goodband, K. C. Behnke, J. L. Nelssen, M. D. Tokach, J. R. Bergstrom, W. B. Nessmith, and I. H. Kim. 1998. The effects of extrusion processing of carbohydrate sources on weanling pig performance. J. Anim. Sci. 76:3034-3042.
  4. Kim, J. C., P. H. Simmins, B. P. Mullan, and J. R. Pluske. 2005. The digestible energy value of wheat for pigs, with special reference to the post-weaned animal. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 122: 257-287.
  5. Kim, J. C., B. P. Mullan, D. J. Hampson, M. M. J. A. Rijnen, and J. R. Pluske. 2007. The digestible energy and net energy content of two varieties of processed rice in pigs of different body weight. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 134:316-325.
  6. Li, D., D. F. Zhang, X. S. Piao, I. K. Han, C. J. Yang, J. B. Li, and J. H. Lee. 2002. Effects of replacing corn with Chinese brown rice on growth performance and apparent fecal digestibility of nutrients in weaning pigs. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1191-1197.
  7. Mateos, G. G., F. Martin, M. A. Latorre, B. Vicente, and R. Lazaro. 2006. Inclusion of oat hulls in diets for young pigs based on cooked maize or cooked rice. Anim. Sci. 82:57-63.
  8. Menoyo, D., M. P. Serrano, V. Barrios, D. G. Valencia, R. Lazaro, J. Argente, and G. G. Mateos. 2011. Cereal type and heat processing of the cereal affect nutrient digestibility and dynamics of serum insulin and ghrelin in weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 89:2793-2800.
  9. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2005. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th edn. Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  10. Apolonio, L. R., J. L. Donzele, R. F. M. Oliveira, A. V. C. Souza, F. C. O. Silva, and S. Bunzen. 2003. Ileal amino acid digestibility of some ingredients, determined by the simple T-cannula technique with pigs. Brazilian Anim. Sci. 32:605-614.
  11. NRC. 2012. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 11th revised edn. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  12. Nyachoti, C. M., C. F. de Lange, and H. Schulze. 1997. Estimating endogenous amino acid flows at the terminal ileum and true ileal amino acid digestibilities in feedstuffs for growing pigs using the homoarginine method. J. Anim. Sci. 75:3206-3213.
  13. Opapeju, F. O., A. Golian, C. M. Nyachoti, and L. D. Campbell. 2006. Amino acid digestibility in dry extruded-expelled soybean meal fed to pigs and poultry. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1130-1137.
  14. Ravindran, V., S. Cabahug, G. Ravindran, P. H. Selle, and W. L. Bryden. 2000. Response of broiler chickens to microbial phytase supplementation as influenced by dietary phytic acid and non-phytate phosphorous levels. II. Effects on apparent metabolisable energy, nutrient digestibility and nutrient retention. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:193-200.
  15. Rostagno, H. S., L. F. T. Albino, J. L. Donzele, P. C. Gomes, and R. F. Oliveira. 2011. Brazilian Tables for Broilers and Pigs. Food Composition and Nutritional Requirements. 3rd edn. Vicosa:MG, Brazil. 252 p.
  16. SAS. 2002. SAS/STAT User Guide, Release 8.0, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  17. Slominski, B. A. 2011. Recent advances in research on enzymes for poultry diets. Poult. Sci. 90:2013-2023.
  18. Teixeira, A. S. 1997. Food and Animal Feed. 4th edn. Lavras:UFLA/FAEPE, MG, Brazil. 402 p.
  19. Tester, R. F., J. Karkalas, and X. Qi. 2004. Starch-Composition, fine structure and architecture. J. Cereal Sci. 39:151-165.
  20. Vicente, B., D. G. Valencia, M. Perez-Serrano, R. Lazaro, and G. G. Mateos. 2008. The effects of feeding rice in substitution of corn and the degree of starch gelatinization of rice on the digestibility of dietary components and productive performance of young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 86:119-126.
  21. Williams, C. H., D. J. David, and O. Iismaa. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. Agric. Sci. 59:381-385.
  22. Woyengo, T. A., E. Kiarie, and C. M. Nyachoti. 2010. Energy and amino acid utilization in expeller-extracted canola meal fed to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 88:1433-1441.
  23. Zijlstra, R. T., S. Li, A. Owusu-Asiedu, P. H. Simmins, and J. F. Patience. 2004. Effect of carbohydrase supplementation of wheat-and canola-meal-based diets on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in group-housed weaned pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84:689-695.