- Volume 17 Issue 4
DOI QR Code
Post-Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Complications in Srinagarind Hospital
- Maleerat, Pimjai (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University) ;
- Chumworathayi, Bandit (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University) ;
- Kietpeerakool, Chumnan (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University) ;
- Luanratanakorn, Sanguanchoke (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University) ;
- Temtanakitpaisan, Amornrat (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University)
- Published : 2016.06.01
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of post-Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) complications in Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand. Retrospective chart review was performed for 200 patients undergoing LEEP during January 2012 to February 2013. Their mean age was 45 years-old. Fifty-three (26.5%) were menopausal. The three most common preceding abnormal cervical cytology were high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL; 50%), atypical squamous cell cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H; 10.5%), and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL; 10%). The overall complications prevalence rate was 16.5% (95%CI, 11.4-21.6). Complications included bleeding (11%; 95%CI, 6.66-15.3), offensive discharge (4%; 95%CI, 1.28-6.72), and pelvic inflammatory disease (1.5%; 95%CI, 0.18-3.18). Only mode of delivery was an independent predictor of post-LEEP complications. Women with previous caesarean sections carried an increased risk of complications by 3.9 times (95%CI, 1.21-12.56) compared with vaginal delivery. In conclusion, LEEP is generally safe with an acceptable complication rate. Previous caesarean section was the only independent predictor for post-LEEP complications. However, this predictor still needs prudent evaluation as no clear cause-effect relationship was identified.
Cervical lesion removal;loop electrosurgical excision;complications;risk factors
- Chan KKL, Tam KF, Tse KY, et al (2007). The use of vaginal antimicrobial after large loop excision of transformation zone: a prospective randomised trial. BJOG, 114, 970-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01417.x
- Dunn TS, Killoran K, Wolf D (2004). Complications of outpatient LLETZ procedures. J Reprod Med, 49, 76-8.
- Ingkapairoj N, Luanratanakorn S, Chumworathayi B, et al (2012). Incidences of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 or cancer pathologic diagnoses in patients with a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion pap smear attending a colposcopy clinic at srinagarind hospital. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 6203-6. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.12.6203
- Janthanaphan M, Wootipoom V, Tangsinmunkong K, et al (2009). Comparison of success rate and complications of contour-loop excision of the transformation zone (C-LETZ) with cold knife conization (CKC) in high grade lesion (HGL) from colposcopic impression. J Medical Assoc Thai, 92, 1573-9.
- Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Khobjai A, et al (2006). Complications of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia: a prospective study. J Med Assoc Thai, 89, 583-7.
- Lindeque BG (2005). Management of cervical premalignant lesions. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 19, 545-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.02.008
- Lopes A, Beynin G, Robertson G, et al (1994). Short term morbidity following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. J Obstet Gynaecol, 14, 197-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443619409004075
- Mints M, Gaberi V, Andersson S (2006). Miniconization procedure with C-LETZ conization electrode for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a Swedish study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scan, 85, 218-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340500345618
- Mitchell MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Cook E, et al (1998). A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol, 92, 737-44.
- Morrill MY, Schimp MO, Abed H, et al (2013). Antibiotic prophylaxis for selected gynecologic surgeries. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 120, 10-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.06.023
- Prendiville W (1995). Large loop excision of the transformation zone. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 38, 622-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003081-199509000-00022
- Prendiville W, Cullimore J, Norman S (1989). Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 96, 1054-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03380.x
- Takac I, Gorisek B (1999). Cold knife conization and loop excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Tumori, 85, 243-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/030089169908500406
- Wright TC Jr, Gagnon S, Richart RM, et al (1992). Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using the loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol, 79, 173-8.
- World Health Organization (WHO) (2014). Comprehensive cervical cancer control: a guide to essential practice (C4GEP), 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO Press: 1-364.