Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes as In Vitro Model to Evaluate Genomic Instability Caused by Low Dose Radiation

  • Tewari, Shikha (Pathology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Khan, Kainat (Pathology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Husain, Nuzhat (Pathology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Rastogi, Madhup (Radiology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Mishra, Surendra P (Radiology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Srivastav, Anoop K (Radiology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences)
  • Published : 2016.06.01


Diagnostic and therapeutic radiation fields are planned so as to reduce side-effects while maximising the dose to site but effects on healthy tissues are inevitable. Radiation causes strand breaks in DNA of exposed cells which can lead to chromosomal aberrations and cause malfunction and cell death. Several researchers have highlighted the damaging effects of high dose radiation but still there is a lacuna in identifying damage due to low dose radiation used for diagnostic purposes. Blood is an easy resource to study genotoxicity and to estimate the effects of radiation. The micronucleus assay and chromosomal aberration can indicate genetic damage and our present aim was to establish these with lymphocytes in an in vitro model to predict the immediate effects low dose radiation. Blood was collected from healthy individuals and divided into 6 groups with increasing radiation dose i.e., 0Gy, 0.10Gy, 0.25Gy, 0.50Gy, 1Gy and 2Gy. The samples were irradiated in duplicates using a LINAC in the radiation oncology department. Standard protocols were applied for chromosomal aberration and micronucleus assays. Metaphases were stained in Giemsa and 200 were scored per sample for the detection of dicentric or acentric forms. For micronuclei detection, 200 metaphases. Giemsa stained binucleate cells per sample were analysed for any abnormality. The micronuclei (MN) frequency was increased in cells exposed to the entire range of doses (0.1-2Gy) delivered. Controls showed minimal MN formation ($2.0%{\pm}0.05$) with triple MN ($5.6%{\pm}2.0$) frequency at the lowest dose. MN formation increased exponentially with the radiation dose thereafter with a maximum at 2Gy. Significantly elevated numbers of dicentric chromosomes were also observed, even at doses of 0.1-0.5Gy, compared to controls, and acentric chromosomes were apparent at 2Gy. In conclusion we can state that lymphocytes can be effectively used to study direct effect of low dose radiation.


Supported by : Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB)


  1. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, et al (2001). Estimated Risks of radiation induced fatal cancer from paediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 176, 289-96.
  2. Brooks AL, Khan MA, Jostes RF, et al (1993). Metaphase chromosomal aberration as markers of radiation exposure and dose. J Toxicol Environ Health, 40, 277-88.
  3. Cardoso RS, Takahashi-H S, Peitl P Jr, et al (2001). Evaluation of chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, and sister chromatid exchanges in hospital workers chronically exposed to ionizing radiation. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen, 21, 431-9.
  4. Fenech M. (2000) The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res, 455, 81-95.
  5. George K, Willingham V, Wu H, et al (2002). Chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes induced by 250 MeV protons: effects of dose, dose rate and shielding. Adv Space Res, 30, 891-9.
  6. Gonzalez AB, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al (2009). Projected Cancer Risks From Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med, 169, 2071-7.
  7. He Y, Gong Y, Lin J, et al (2013). Ionizing radiation-induced ${\gamma}$-H2AX activity in whole blood culture and the risk of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 22, 443-51.
  8. Johnson JN, Hornik CP, Li JS, et al (2014). Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimation in children with heart disease. Circulation, 130, 161-7.
  9. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, et al (2013). The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr, 167, 700-7.
  10. Milacic S. (2009) Chromosomal Aberrations after exposure to low doses of ionising radiation. J BUON, 14, 641-6.
  11. M'kacher R, E Maalouf , Terzoudi G, et al, (2015) Detection and automated scoring of dicentric chromosomes in nonstimulated lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes after telomere and centromere staining. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 91, 640-9.
  12. Moorhead PS, Nowell PC, Mellman WJ, (1960). Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Exp Cell Res, 20, 613-6.
  13. Nguyen PK, Wu JC (2011). Radiation exposure from imaging tests: is there an increased cancer risk? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther, 9, 177-83.
  14. Nikjoo H.. (2003). Radiation track and DNA damage. Iran J Radiat Res, 1, 3-16.
  15. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al (2012). Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 380, 499-505.
  16. Sodickson A, Baeyers P F, Andriole K P, et al.(2009). Recurrent CT, Cumulative Radiation Exposure and associated radiation induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiol, 251, 175-84.

Cited by

  1. Active caspase-3 expression levels as bioindicator of individual radiosensitivity vol.89, pp.1 suppl, 2017,
  2. The Lowest Radiation Dose Having Molecular Changes in the Living Body vol.16, pp.2, 2018,