# Application of In Situ Measurement for Site Remediation and Final Status Survey of Decommissioning KRR Site

• Accepted : 2016.06.13
• Published : 2016.06.30

#### Abstract

Background: In situ gamma spectrometry has been used to measure environmental radiation, assumptions are usually made about the depth distribution of the radionuclides of interest in the soil. The main limitation of in situ gamma spectrometry lies in determining the depth distribution of radionuclides. The objective of this study is to develop a method for subsurface characterization by in situ measurement. Materials and Methods: The peak to valley method based on the ratio of counting rate between the photoelectric peak and Compton region was applied to identify the depth distribution. The peak to valley method could be applied to establish the relation between the spectrally derived coefficients (Q) with relaxation mass per unit area (${\beta}$) for various depth distribution in soil. The in situ measurement results were verified by MCNP simulation and calculated correlation equation. In order to compare the depth distributions and contamination levels in decommissioning KRR site, in situ measurement and sampling results were compared. Results and Discussion: The in situ measurement results and MCNP simulation results show a good correlation for laboratory measurement. The simulation relationship between Q and source burial for the source layers have exponential relationship for a variety depth distributions. We applied the peak to valley method to contaminated decommissioning KRR site to determine a depth distribution and initial activity without sampling. The observed results has a good correlation, relative error between in situ measurement with sampling result is around 7% for depth distribution and 4% for initial activity. Conclusion: In this study, the vertical activity distribution and initial activity of $^{137}Cs$ could be identifying directly through in situ measurement. Therefore, the peak to valley method demonstrated good potential for assessment of the residual radioactivity for site remediation in decommissioning and contaminated site.

#### Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

#### References

1. Lee KW, Hong SB, Park JH, Chung US. Final status of the decommissioning of research reactor in Korea. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2010 Jan;47(12): 1227-1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2010.9720990
2. Benke RR, Kearfott KJ. An improved in situ method for determining depth distribution of gamma-ray emitting radionuclides. Nucl. Instrum. Method Phys. Res. A. 2001 Jan;463:393-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00449-1
3. Zoombori P, Andrasi INA, Lettner H. In situ measurement of the contaminated in some selected settlements of Byelorussia(BSSR), Ukraine (UkrSSR) and the Russian Federation(RSFSR), J. of Enviro. Radioact. 1992;17:97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0265-931X(92)90019-P
4. Tyler AN. Monitoring anthropogenic radioactivity in salt marsh environments through in situ gamma ray spectrometry. J. Enviro. Radioact. 1999;45: 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(98)00110-6
5. Norihiro M, Satoshi M, Susumu S, Junko T, Masakazu N, Kiyotaka S, Kiichiro U, Sigetomo H, Kimiaki S. Depth profiles of radioactive cesium in soil using scraper plate over a wide area surrounding the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant, Japan. J. Enviro. Radioact. 2014 Jan;139:427-434.
6. International Commissioning on Radiation Units and Measurements. Gamma-ray spectrometry in the environment. ICRU Report 53. 1994;18-23.