Spatial and Temporal Analyses of Cervical Cancer Patients in Upper Northern Thailand

  • Thongsak, Natthapat (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Chitapanarux, Imjai (Division of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Suprasert, Prapaporn (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Prasitwattanaseree, Sukon (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Bunyatisai, Walaithip (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Sripan, Patumrat (Division of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University) ;
  • Traisathit, Patrinee (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University)
  • Published : 2016.11.01


Background: Cervical cancer is a major public health problem worldwide. There have been several studies indicating that risk is associated with geographic location and that the incidence of cervical cancer has changed over time. In Thailand, incidence rates have also been found to be different in each region. Methods: Participants were women living or having lived in upper Northern Thailand and subjected to cervical screening at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital between January 2010 and December 2014. Generalized additive models with Loess smooth curve fitting were applied to estimate the risk of cervical cancer. For the spatial analysis, Google Maps were employed to find the geographical locations of the participants' addresses. The Quantum Geographic Information System was used to make a map of cervical cancer risk. Two univariate smooths: x equal to the residency duration was used in the temporal analysis of residency duration, and x equal to the calendar year that participants moved to upper Northern Thailand or birth year for participants already living there, were used in the temporal analysis of the earliest year. The spatial-temporal analysis was conducted in the same way as the spatial analysis except that the data were split into overlapping calendar years. Results: In the spatial analysis, the risk of cervical cancer was shown to be highest in the Eastern sector of upper Northern Thailand (p-value <0.001). In the temporal analysis of residency duration, the risk was shown to be steadily increasing (p-value =0.008), and in the temporal analysis of the earliest year, the risk was observed to be steadily decreasing (p-value=0.016). In the spatial-temporal analysis, the risk was stably higher in Chiang Rai and Nan provinces compared to Chiang Mai province. According to the display movement over time, the odds of developing cervical cancer declined in all provinces. Conclusions: The risk of cervical cancer has decreased over time but, in some areas, there is a higher risk than in the major province of Chiang Mai. Therefore, we should promote cervical cancer screening coverage in all areas, especially where access is difficult and/or to women of lower socioeconomic status.


  1. Adler NE, Ostrove JM (1999). Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don't. Ann NY Acad Sci, 896, 3-15.
  2. Aguettant JL (1996). Impact of population registration on hilltribe development in Thailand. Asia Pac Popul J, 11, 47-72.
  3. Ahmadi KA, Zahrani AA (2013). Spatial autocorrelation of cancer incidence in Saudi Arabia. Int J Environ Res Publ Health, 10, 7207-28.
  4. American Cancer Society (2015). Cervical Cancer. Accessed 5 July 2015 from
  5. Cancer Research UK (2015). Cervical cancer risk factor. Accessed 5 July 2015 from http://www.cancerresearchuk. org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-bycancer-type/cervical-cancer/risk-factors#heading-Zero.
  6. Cheng EM, Atkinson PM, Shahani AK (2011). Elucidating the spatially varying relation between cervical cancer and socioeconomic conditions in England. Int J Health Geogr, 10, 51.
  7. Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, et al (2009). Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control, 20, 417-35.
  8. Donprasit S (2016). Zoning study area. Accessed 5 July 2015 from
  9. Du PL, Wu KS, Fang JY, et al (2015). Cervical Cancer Mortality Trends in China, 1991-2013, and Predictions for the Future. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 16, 6391-6.
  10. Fielding AH (2015). Generalized Additive Models. Accessed 5 July 2015 from
  11. Froment MA, Gomez SL, Roux A, DeRouen MC, Kidd EA (2014). Impact of socioeconomic status and ethnic enclave on cervical cancer incidence among Hispanics and Asians in California. Gynecol Oncol, 133, 409-15.
  12. Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1999). Generalized additive models. Boca Raton, Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  13. Hernandez NEB, Rodriguez MA, Fleites OA (2013). Analisis espacial de la morbimortalidad del cancer de mama y cervix: Villa Clara. Cuba. 2004-2009. Rev Esp Salud Publica, 87, 49-57.
  14. Highland Research and Development Institute (Public Organization) (2009). Strategy project of development and conservation natural resources on the highland during 2010- 2019. Highland Research and Development Institute. Accessed 22 June 2016 from
  15. Imsamran W, Chaiwerawattana A, Wiangnon S, et al, editors. (2015). Cancer in Thailand. 1st ed. New Thammada Press, Bangkok, 88-115.
  16. Jontasopeepun P, Davidson PM, Srisomboon J (2012). Issues and challenges in implementing cervical cancer screenings in the emergence of HPV vaccination in Thailand. Collegian, 19, 45-50.
  17. Kritpetcharat O, Wutichouy W, Sirijaichingkul S, Kritpetcharat P (2012). Comparison of Pap smear screening results between Akha hill tribe and urban women in Chiang Rai province, Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 5501-4.
  18. National Cervical Cancer Coalition (2016). Cervical Cancer Overview. Accessed 16 Aug 2016 from
  19. National Economics and Social Development Board (2016). Mortality rate of cervical cancer in Thailand. Accessed 16 Aug 2016 from
  20. National Statistical Office (2015). Household income and expenditure and number of households, Thailand. Accessed 2 Sep 2016 from
  21. National Statistical Office (2015). Population and Housing, Thailand. Accessed 2 Sep 2016 from
  22. Peirson L, Lewis DF, Ciliska D, Warren R (2013). Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev, 2, 35.
  23. Rosner B (2000). Fundamentals of biostatistics. 5th ed. Pacific Grove, Duxbury, 98-120.
  24. Sriplung H, Singkham P, Iamsirithaworn S, Jiraphongsa C, Bilheem S (2014). Success of a cervical cancer screening program: trends in incidence in songkhla, southern Thailand, 1989-2010, and prediction of future incidences to 2030. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 10003-8.
  25. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al (2015). Global cancer statistics, 2012: Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin, 65, 87-108.
  26. Vaccarella S, Tieulent JL, Plummer M, Franceschi S, Bray F (2013). Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: Impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors. Eur J Cancer, 49, 3262-73.
  27. Vieira VM, Webster TF, Weinberg JM, Aschengrau A, Ozonoff D (2005). Spatial analysis of lung, colorectal, and breast cancer on Cape Cod: An application of generalized additive models to case-control data. Environ Health, 4, 11.
  28. Vieira VM, Webster TF, Weinberg JM, Aschengrau A (2008). Spatial-temporal analysis of breast cancer in upper Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Int J Health Geogr, 7, 46.
  29. Walter SD, Bimie SE, Marrett LD, et al (1994). The Geographic variation of cancer incidence in Ontario. Am J Public Health, 84, 367-76.
  30. Webster TF, Vieira VM, Weinberg J, Aschengrau A (2006). Method for mapping population-based case-control studies: an application using generalized additive models. Int J Health Geogr, 5, 26.
  31. Wiwanitkit V (2006). Screening for cervical cancer, results from Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 7, 329-30.
  32. World Health Organization (2016). Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Accessed 16 Aug 2016 from