High Rate of Gangrenous Adnexal Torsion: Dilemma of a Missing Silent Cancer

  • Published : 2016.11.01


Background: Adnexal torsion results in ischemia of structures distal to twisted pedicle and acute onset of pain is responsible for about 3% of all gynecologic emergencies. Ovarian torsion classically occurs in a pathological enlarged ovary, as with cancer, but diagnosis remains a challenge. Objective: Our purpose was to evaluate clinical risk factors predictive of torsion with gangrenous adnexa. Material and methods: A retrospective descriptive study and chart review of surgically proven ovarian torsion/adnexal torsion cases at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Prapokklao Hospital, Chanthaburi, Thailand between January 2011 and December 2015 was conducted. Result: Seventy-eight cases were identified. Mean age at presentation was 35.5 years. The average maximum diameter of the ovarian tumors was 10.8 cm. The percentage of gangrenous ovarian cysts in this study was 46.2 (36/78). The precision to determine the pathological site by patient, physician and ultrasonography was 8.5, 24.2 and 83.3 percent, respectively with statistically significant variation. Conclusion: Ovarian/adnexal torsion remains a challenge condition especially in young nulliparous women. Sophisticated investigation does not guarantee ovary preservation. Combining clinical acumen, appropriate tests and detailed consideration may be the best practice at the present time.


Supported by : Research Institute of Prapokklao Hospital


  1. Abduljabbar HS, Bukhari YA, Al Hachim EG, et al (2016). Review of 244 cases of ovarian cysts. Saudi Med J, 36, 834-8.
  2. Berek JS (2012). Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea. In: 'Berek and Novak's gynecology', Eds Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 475.
  3. Damigos E, Johns J, Ross J (2012). An update on the diagnosis and management of ovarian torsion. Obstet Gynecol, 14, 229-36.
  4. Erdemoglu M, Kuyumcuoglu U, Guzel AI (2011). Clinical experience of adnexal torsion: evaluation of 143 cases. J Exp Ther Oncol, 9, 171-4.
  5. Huchon C, Panel P, Kayem G, et al (2012). Does this woman have adnexal torsion? Hum Reprod, 27, 2359-64.
  6. Karadag B, Kocak M, Kayikcioglu F, et al (2014). Risk for malignant and borderline ovarian neoplasms following basic preoperative evaluation by ultrasonography, ca125 level and age. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 8489-93.
  7. Lobo RA, Gershenson DM, Lentz GM, et al (2016). Comprehensive gynecology, Philadelphia, Elsevier, pp 418-21.
  8. Lourenco AP, Swenson D, Tubbs RJ, et al (2014). Ovarian and tubal torsion: imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI. Emerg Radiol, 21, 179-87.
  9. Mahim N, Maria C, Mandana M (2012). Clinical and pathological findings of ovarian cyst, Torsion over the ovary period of ten years (2001-2011). JPSI, 6, 79-81.
  10. Mashiach R, Melamed N, Gilad N, et al (2011). Sonographic diagnosis of ovarian torsion: accuracy and predictive factors. Ultrasound Med, 30, 1205-10.
  11. Oranratanaphan S, Khemapech N (2013). Characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with malignant transformation arising from mature cystic teratoma of the ovary: experience at a single institution. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 4693-7.
  12. Sahlu Z, Negash S, Yusuf L (2014). Adnexal torsion a fiveyear retrospective review in two hospitals. Ethiop Med J, 52, 155-64.
  13. Sasaki KJ, Miller CE (2013). Adnexal Torsion: Review of the Literature. J minim invasive gynecol, 21, 196-202.
  14. Simsek HS, Tokmak A, Ozgu E, et al (2014). Role of a risk of malignancy index in clinical approaches to adnexal masses. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 7793-7.
  15. Tobiume T, Shiota M, Umemoto M, et al (2011). Predictive factors for ovarian necrosis in torsion of ovarian tumor. Tohoku J Exp Med, 225, 211-4.