Breast Cancer Detection Rate, Incidence, Prevalence and Interval Cancer-related Mammography Screening Times among Thai Women

  • Sripaiboonkij, Nintita (Department of Biostatistics and Demography, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Thinkamrop, Bandit (Department of Biostatistics and Demography, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Promthet, Supannee (Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Kannawat, Chalermdej (Thanyarak Breast Center, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Tangcharoensathien, Voranuj (Thanyarak Breast Center, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Ansusing, Tamnit (Thanyarak Breast Center, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Rattanamongkolgul, Suthee (Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University at Ongkharak)
  • Published : 2016.08.01


Background: A recent guideline by the American Cancer Society recommended that mammography (MMG) should be done for women starting in their mid-40s. In Thailand, information on opportunistic mammography screening is limited and data on the total incidence of breast cancer are also lacking. The purpose of this study was to estimate the breast cancer detection, incident and prevalence rates among Thai women. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the opportunistic mammography screening of normal women between 30 and 80 years who underwent the procedure between 2001 and 2010. All cases were followed until 2012. The detection rate was calculated for the whole period of observation using 'number of women with positive findings' divided by 'total number of women screened'. The incidence rate was calculated only at the first MMG while the subsequence rate was calculated based on all new cases detected at each subsequent MMG. Results: Among the 47,430 women, there were 152,091 MMGs or approximately 3.2 occasions per person (range, 1-10). The average duration of the interval between each subsequence visit was 1.8 years. Overall, breast cancer was detected in 543 women, with a detection rate of 10.3 per 1,000 persons. The prevalence rate of breast cancer at the first visit was 5.78 per 1,000 persons. The incidence or new cases detected at any follow-up visit was 10.4 per 1,000 persons. The overall interval cancer was 0.91 per 1,000 women, mainly detected before their second and third MMG, with a rate of 0.0.47 and 0.76 per 1,000 women. Conclusions: Opportunistic mammography screening in Thailand detected 10 case of breast cancer from each 1,000 women. This paper indicated a high rate of cancer detection during a two year interval, hence, a screening mammogram should be performed more often.


  1. Chang CM, Lin WC, Kuo HS, et al (2007). Estimation and prediction system for multi-state disease process: application to analysis of organized screening regime. J Eval Clin Pract, 13, 867-81.
  2. D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA. Mendelson EB, Morris EA, et al (2013). Follow-up and outcome monitoring. In: Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BIRADS. 5th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology
  3. Howlander N, Noone A, Krapcho M, et al (2015). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2012. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
  4. Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, et al (2011). Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med, 155, 481-492.
  5. American Cancer Society (2013). Breast cancer: early detection [Internet]. Available from
  6. Chaiwerawattana A, Sukornyothin S, Imsamran W, Khuhaprema T (2013). Early breast cancer detection. Bangkok, Thailand: National Breast Society.
  7. Imsamran W, Chaiwarawattana A, Wiangnon S, Pongnikorn D (2015). Cancer in Thailand (Vol VIII, 2010-2012). National Cancer Institute, Thailand.
  8. Jung KW, Kong HJ, Won YJ, et al (2011). Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2008. Cancer Res Treat, 43, 1-11.
  9. Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, et al (2013). Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy. JAMA, 173, 807-816.
  10. Khunaprema T,Attasara P, Sriplung H, et al (2013). Cancer in Thailand (Vol. VII, 2007-2009). National Cancer Institute, Thailand.
  11. Lee WC (2006). Breast, stomach and colorectal cancer screening in Korea. J Med Screen, 13, 20-2.
  12. Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, et al (2009). Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med, 151, 738-47.
  13. Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R, et al (2015). Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA, 314, 1599-614
  14. Public outreach and civil society division of the ASEAN secretariat (2015). Cause of death in Thailand. In: ASEAN statistical yearbook 2014 [internet]. Available from
  15. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. (2014). Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin, 64, 9-29.
  16. Siegel R, Miller DK, Jemal A. (2015). Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin, 65, 5-29.
  17. Leong SP, Shen ZZ, Liu TJ, et al (2010). Is breast cancer the same disease in Asian and Western Countries? World J Surg, 34, 2308-24.
  18. Tabar L, Faberberg G, Day NE, et al (1987). What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish twocounty breast cancer screening trial. Br J Cancer, 55, 547-51.
  19. Torre AL, Bray F, Siegel LR, et al (2015). Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin, 2, 87-108.
  20. Wilson J, Jungner G. (1968). Principles and practice of screening for disease. Geneva, Switzerland. World Health Organization.
  21. Wu TY, Chung S, Yeh MC, et al (2012). Understanding breast cancer screening practices in Taiwan: a country with universal health care. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 13, 4289-94.