Analysis of University Student Awareness of Radiation Exposures from Consumer Products

  • Received : 2015.07.21
  • Accepted : 2016.01.11
  • Published : 2016.03.31


Background: Since the terminology 'radioactive consumer product' is not quite familiar to the public and is often considered as negative and detrimental things, the educational curriculum is essential for establishing reliability of nuclear energy related and for the development of better communication strategy of radiation risk with the public. To provide base data which is valuable for establishing efficient curriculum of education and training about radiation safety, it is necessary to apprehend the different level of awareness of radiation exposures classified by various consumer products. Materials and Methods: On November 2014, a question investigation about asking awareness level of radiation exposure from various consumer products was done for university students who are highly educated. The object students are studied at a four-year-course universities which is located at Daejeon City. Results and Discussion: Although the average awareness level is comparatively low, the awareness of senior students, who major in radiation, nuclear related departments and male students are relatively high. On the other hand, the awareness of freshman, sophomore, junior students, who do not major in radiation, nuclear related departments and female students are relatively low. It is necessary to provide various information to avoid unnecessary concerns and misconceptions about radiation exposure. Conclusion: This paper will be an instrument for efficient establishment of curriculum of education and training related with radiation safety.


  1. Kim YG, Jin SH, Park SO. Studies on the risk-govering criminal law and criminology in the late-modern society(II) - Energy technology and criminal colicy for the risk management especially in respect to nuclear power technology. 13-CB-04. Korean Institute of Criminology. Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2014;6-7.
  2. Korean Association for Radiation Application. Statistics of radiation usage in 2012. Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2013;6-7.
  3. Yang HH. Investigation of high school students recognitions for ordinary utilizations and influences of nuclear energy. Korea National University of Education. MS Thesis. 2006;1-2.
  4. Kang BS, Park SJ, Lee HJ. A study on the public recognition change on radiation by providing education and practice. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2008;2(4):27-32.
  5. Park BJ. Analysis of adolescent awareness of radiation: Marking the first anniversary of the Fukushima nuclear accident. Journal of Radiation Protection and Research. 2012;37(2):75-83.
  6. Kim SY, Kim GS. Analysis of attitude change of the acceptance of nuclear power after Fukushima nuclear accident. The Korean Association for Policy Studies. 2014;23(3):57-89.
  7. Song YS, Han DS. Exploration of influencing factors for acceptance of scientific technology information- With focus on acceptance of recognition and information related to nuclear energy. Journalism and Communication. 2011;15(2):207-235.
  8. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 Report Vol I Annex B. New York, NY. 2008;253.
  9. Shaw J, Dunderdale J, Paynter RA. A Review of consumer products containing radioactive substances in the European Union. Radiation Protection 146. National Radiological Protection Board, London, UK. 2007;11-14.
  10. Oh MY, Choi JY, Kim HS. Stigma effect of technology with risk : The impact of Stigma on nuclear power on the perception and acceptance of products based on radiation technology. Korean Society for Journalism and Communication Studies. 2008;52(1):467-500.
  11. Han EO, Park BS. Knowledges, consciousnesses, and attitudes of some university students on the use of radiations. Journal of Radiation Protection and Research. 2005;30(4):221-230.

Cited by

  1. Evaluating Radioactivity Remote Laboratory’s Effectiveness in Learning Radioactivity Concepts pp.1573-1898, 2018,