DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Progress and Problems in Korean Public Library Policies

한국 공공도서관정책의 추이와 과제

  • 이제환 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2016.02.26
  • Accepted : 2016.03.10
  • Published : 2016.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to discuss about the progress and problems in Korean public library policies. The emphasis is on identifying both distinctive features and indigenous limitations in Korean Library Act and National Plans for Library Development. This article also investigates the current status and weakness of major policy driving forces such as national library policy committee(President's Committee on Library and Information Policy), administrative support organization, and professional associations. Finally suggested are both strategies and methods for promoting the quality of Korean public library policies, with focusing on enhancing public librarians' capacity of policy participation.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 부산대학교

References

  1. 도서관정보정책위원회. 2008. 제1차 도서관발전종합계획, 2009-2013. 서울: 동위원회. President's Committee on Library and Information Policy. 2008. The Comprehensive Library Advancement Plan(2009-2013). Seoul: President's Committee on Library and Information Policy.
  2. 도서관정보정책위원회. 2014. 제2차 도서관발전종합계획, 2014-2018. 서울: 동위원회. President's Committee on Library and Information Policy. 2014. The Second Comprehensive Library Advancement Plan(2014-2018). Sejong: President's Committee on Library and Information Policy.
  3. 문화관광부. 2007. 공공도서관 행정체계 일원화 방안 연구. 서울: 문화관광부. Ministry of Culture and Tourism. 2007. A Report on the Unified Plan of the Administrative System for the Public Library. Seoul: Ministry of Culture and Tourism.
  4. 문화체육관광부. 2015. 공공도서관 행.재정체계 일원화를 위한 법제도 개선방안에 대한 연구용역. 서울: 문화체육관광부. Ministry of Culture and Tourism. 2015. A Report on the Unified Plan of the Administrative and Financial System for the Public Library. Seoul: Ministry of Culture and Tourism.
  5. 양태진. 1974. 공공도서관 소속청 일원화와 직제의 합리화. 도협월보, 16(8): 168-172. Yang, Tae-Jin. 1974. "On the Problem of Office Regulations and Subordinate Government Office for Public Library." KLA Bulletin, 16(8): 168-172.
  6. 윤희윤. 2007. 국내 공공도서관의 정책적 현안과 과제. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(2): 31-54. Yoon, Hee-Yoon. 2007. "Policy Issues and Tasks of Public Libraries in Korea." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(2): 31-54. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.2.031
  7. 윤희윤. 2009. 공공도서관 행정체계 개편 방안 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 43(3): 5-29. Yoon, Hee-Yoon. 2009. "A Study on the Reform Plan of the Public Library Administrative System in Korea." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(3): 5-29.
  8. 윤희윤. 2014. 국내 공공도서관의 보편성과 특수성 담론. 한국문헌정보학회지, 48(1): 5-25. Yoon, Hee-Yoon. 2014. "Discourse on the University and Particularity of Public Libraries in Korea." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(1): 5-25. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.1.005
  9. 이용남. 1992. 도서관 행정체계 문제. 도서관문화, 33(5): 270-278. Lee, Yong-Nam. 1992. "The Problem of the Administrative System in Korea." Library Culture, 33(5): 270-278.
  10. 이제환. 2000. '참' 지식혁명을 위한 공공도서관 혁명의 당위성. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 31(1): 115-141. Lee, Jae-Whoan. 2000. "Public Library Revolution for the 'Real' Knowledge Revolution." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 31(1): 115-141.
  11. 이제환. 2008. 한국 도서관정보정책의 추이와 과제. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 39(4): 5-32. Lee, Jae-Whoan. 2008. "Progress and Problems in Korean Library and Information Policies." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(4): 5-32.
  12. 이제환. 2012. 한국 대학도서관정책의 추이와 과제. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 43(4): 317-346. Lee, Jae-Whoan. 2012. "Progress and Problems in Korean Academic Library Policies." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(4): 317-346.
  13. 차성종. 2014. 도서관 행정체계 일원화 정책 분석 연구: 제1, 2차 도서관발전종합계획을 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 48(4): 241-266. Cha, Sung-Jong. 2014. "An Analysis on the Unified Policy of the Administrative System for the Public Library: Focusing on the First and the Second Comprehensive Library Advancement Plan." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(4): 241-266.