Changes in Vietnamese Male Smokers' Reactions Towards New Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Over Time

  • Published : 2016.04.14


Printing of pictorial health warnings (PHWs) on cigarette packages became obligatory by the Vietnam Law on Prevention and Control of Tobacco Harm in May 2013. Literature from high-income countries suggests that PHWs motivate smokers to quit smoking although their long-term effects have been questioned due to reduction of impact over time. This study aimed to assess the salience of PHWs and smokers' reactions towards PHWs over time. In May 2014 and May 2015, a cross-sectional questionnaire-based household survey was administered to respectively 1,462 and 1,509 Vietnamese male smokers aged 18 to 35. The result showed that salience of the PHWs 2 years after the implementation was higher than at the point of 1 year after the implementation. The proportion of respondents who tried to avoid noting the PHWs was reduced from 35% in wave 1 to 23% in wave 2. However, "Tried to avoid looking/thinking about the PHWs" increased 1.5 times the odds of presenting quit intention compared to those respondents who did not try to avoid looking/thinking about the PHWs (OR=1.5; 95%CI: 1.2-2.0). In conclusion, avoidance regarding PHWs may not work as a barrier when aiming at a higher level of quit intention. Salience of the PHWs may increase in the period shortly after their introduction onto packs but can be expected to decrease with time. In other words, it might be advisable to change or renew PHWs after a period of implementation to maintain their beneficial effects.


  1. Auemaneekul N, Silpasuwan P, Sirichotiratana N, et al (2015). The impact of cigarette plain packaging on health warning salience and perceptions: implications for public health policy. Asia Pac J Public Health, 27, 848-59.
  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2004). National Drug Strategy Household Survey: detailed findings. Canberra: AIHW cat. no. PHE 66.
  3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2010). National Drug Strategy Household Survey: survey report. Canberra: AIHW cat. no. PHE 145.
  4. Borland R, Wilson N, Fong GT, et al (2009a). Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years. Tob Control, 18, 358-64.
  5. Borland R, Yong HH, Wilson N, et al (2009b). How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: findings from the ITC Four-Country survey. Addiction, 104, 669-75.
  6. Borland R, Hill D (1997). Initial impact of the new Australian tobacco health warnings on knowledge and beliefs. Tobacco Control, 6, 317-25.
  7. Canadian Cancer Society (2010). Cigarette Package Health Warnings - International Status Report. Canada.
  8. Elton-Marshall T, Xu SS, Meng G, et al (2015). The lower effectiveness of text-only health warnings in China compared to pictorial health warnings in Malaysia. Tobacco Control, 24, 6-13.
  9. Fagan P, Augustson E, Backinger CL, et al (2007). Quit attempts and intention to quit cigarette smoking among young adults in the United States. Am J Public Health, 97, 1412-20.
  10. Fathelrahman AI, Li L, Borland R, et al (2013). Stronger pack warnings predict quitting more than weaker ones: finding from the ITC Malaysia and Thailand surveys. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 11, 20.
  11. Fathelrahman AI, Omar M, Awang R, et al (2010). Impact of the new Malaysian cigarette pack warnings on smokers' awareness of health risks and interest in quitting smoking. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 7, 4089-99.
  12. Feng G, Jiang Y, Li Q, et al (2010). Individual-level factors associated with intentions to quit smoking among adult smokers in six cities of China: findings from the ITC China Survey. Tobacco Control, 19, 6-11.
  13. Hammond D (2007). Tobacco labelling and packaging: A review of evidence. International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.
  14. Hammond D (2009). Tobacco labelling and packaging toolkit: A guide for FCTC Article 11. Ottawa, Canada: University of Waterloo. Department of Health Studies.
  15. Hammond D (2011). Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob Control, 20, 327-37.
  16. Hammond D, Fong G T, McNeill A, et al (2006). Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control, 15, 19-25.
  17. Hammond D, G T Fong, P W McDonald, et al (2003). Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour. Tobacco Control, 12, 391-5.
  18. Hyland A, Borland R, Li Q, et al (2006). Individual-level predictors of cessation behaviours among participants in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control, 15, 83-94.
  19. Hyland A, Li Q, Bauer JE, et al (2004). Predictors of cessation in a cohort of current and former smokers followed over 13 years. Nicotine Tobacco Res, 6, 363-9.
  20. International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. Countries report: China summary report. 2009.
  21. Li L, Borland R, Yong H, et al (2015). Longer term impact of cigarette package warnings in Australia compared with the United Kingdom and Canada. Health Educ Res, 30, 67-80.
  22. Miller CL, Hill DJ, Quester PG, et al (2009). Impact on the Australian Quitline of new graphic cigarette pack warnings including the Quitline number. Tobacco Control, 18, 235-7.
  23. Moodie C, Mackintosh AM, G. H (2013). Adolescents' response to pictorial warnings on the reverse panel of cigarette packs: a repeat cross-sectional study. Tobacco Control, 1-5.
  24. National Assembly of Vietnam. Law on Prevention and Control of Tobacco Harms. 09/2012/QH13. Government document. Language: Vietnamese.
  25. Nguyen NB, Do MS (2006). The views of consumers about the health warnings on cigarette packets. Vietnam J Public Health, 5, 8-14.
  26. O'Hegarty M, Pederson LL, Yenokyan G, et al (2007). Young adults' perceptions of cigarette warning labels in the United States and Canada. Prev Chronic Dis, 4, A27.
  27. Panda R, Venkatesan S, Persai D, et al (2014). Factors determining intention to quit tobacco: exploring patient responses visiting public health facilities in India. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 12, 1-4.
  28. Sychareun V, Hansana V, Phengsavanh A, et al (2015). Perceptions and acceptability of pictorial health warning labels vs text only - a cross-sectional study in Lao PDR. BMC Public Health, 15, 1094.
  29. Tan YL, Ulysses D (2013). The ASEAN tobacco control atlas. Bangkok, Thailand: Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA).
  30. Vardavas CI, Connolly G, Karamanolis K, et al (2009). Adolescents perceived effectiveness of the proposed European graphic tobacco warning labels. Eur J Public Health, 19, 212-7.
  31. Vathesatogkit P (2010). Article 11 (Packaging and Labelling of Tobacco products) Guidelines, Thailand, Action on Smoking and Health Foundation (ASH).
  32. Vietnam Ministry of Health, Hanoi Medical University, General Statictis Office, et al Global Adults Tobacco Survey GATS - Vietnam final report 2010. Hanoi, Vietnam: 2010. Language: English.
  33. Vietnam Ministry of Health, Vietnam Ministry of Industry and Trade. Joint Circular guiding the labeling, printing pictorial health warnings on cigarette packages. 05 /2013/TTLT-BYT-BCT. Government document. Language: Vietnamese.
  34. White V, Bariola E, Faulkner A, et al (2014). Graphic health warnings on cigarette packs: how long before the effects on adolescents wear out? Nicotine Tobacco Res 17, 776-83.
  35. World Health Organization (2005). Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), Geneva, Switzerland, WHO Press.
  36. World Health Organization 2008. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic: The MPOWER package, Geneva, Switzerland, WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.