Exploratory Study of Characterizing Scholarly Communication Patterns in Humanities for Facilitating Consilience in Cyberscholarship Environment: Based on Historians' Research Activities

사이버스칼러쉽 환경에서의 융복합 연구 촉진을 위한 인문학 분야 학술 커뮤니케이션 특성 파악에 관한 연구 - 역사학 분야를 중심으로 -

  • 유소영 (한남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2016.01.22
  • Accepted : 2016.02.09
  • Published : 2016.02.29


Digitalized data and literature in scholarly community has developed the concept of digital humanities and cyberscholarship which indicate the characteristics of a new aspect and approach in scholarly activities with digitalized resources or new media. This study was performed in order to identify the changes in national research activities of art and humanities by using a multi-modal approach. The combined methodology of in-depth interview and content analysis on publishing and citing behaviors in literature was executed. The steps of research process is identified as a non-linear combination of 3 parts: developing research idea, developing the research idea to write, and submitting manuscript to publish. Prominent implementations of cyberscholarship were found in the 2nd step for accessing and using research data and literatures. Understanding the characteristics of scholar communication using cyberscholarhip factors in humanities for interdisciplinarity, sophisticating the environment of cyberscholarhip for data sharing, investing and developing archivist and archives, and providing a various platform for accelerating scholarly communication were derived by the panel discussion for developing interdisciplinary research for humanities.


Supported by : 한국연구재단


  1. 권나현, 이정연, 정은경. 2012. 과학기술분야 R&D 전주기 연구: 국내 생명 및 나노과학기술 연구자를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(3): 103-131.(Kwon, Nahyun, Lee, Jungyeoun and Chung, Eunkyung. 2012. "Understanding ScientificResearch Lifecycle: Based on Bio- and Nano- Scientists' Research Activities." Journal ofthe Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(3): 103-131.)
  2. 이정연, 정은경, 권나현. 2012. 과학기술분야 연구활동 단계별 문제상황 극복을 위한 정보행동 연구. 정보관리학회지, 29(3): 99-122.(Lee, Jungyeoun, Chung, Eunkyung and Kwon, Nahyun. 2013. "Scientists' Information Behaviorfor Bridging the Gaps Encountered in the Process of the Scientific Research Lifecycle."Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(3): 99-122.)
  3. 한상완. 2000. 디지털시대의 정보조사제공학. 서울: 구미무역.(Han, Sang-Wan. 2000. Information Service in Digital Age. Seoul: Kumibooks.)
  4. Arms, W. Y. 2008. "Cyberscholarship: High Performance Computing Meets Digital Libraries." Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(1). [online] [cited 2015. 12. 30.]
  5. Arms, W. Y. and Larsen, R. L. 2007. "The Future of Scholarly Communication: Building the Infrastructure for Cyberscholarship." In Report of the NSF/JISC Workshop on Scholarly Information Repositories, April 17-19, 2007, Arizona: 1-31.
  6. Barrett, A. 2005. "The Information-Seeking Habits of Graduate Student Researchers in the Humanities." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(4): 324-331.
  7. Buchanan, G. et al. 2005. "Information Seeking by Humanities Scholars." Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3652: 218-229.
  8. Burdick, A. et al. 2012. Digital Humanities. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  9. Case, D. O. 2010. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. 2nd ed. London: Emerald Group Publishing.
  10. Dalton, M. S. and Charnigo, L. 2004. "Historians and Their Information Sources." College & Research Libraries, 65(5): 400-425.
  11. Dervin, B. 1983. An Overview of Sense-Making Research: Concepts, Methods and Results. May, 1983, Dalls, TX. [online] [cited 2015. 12. 30.]
  12. Dervin, B. 1998. "Sense-Making Theory and Practice: An Overview of User Interests in Knowledge Seeking and Use." Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2): 36-46.
  13. Dervin, B., Foreman-Wernet, L. and Lauterbach, E. 2003. Sense-Making Methodology Reader: Selected Writings of Brenda Dervin. New York: Hampton Press.
  14. Drummond, R. and Wartho, R. 2009. "RIMS: The Research Impact Measurement Service at the University of New South Wales." Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40(2): 76-87.
  15. Foster, A. 2004. "Nonlinear Model of Information Seeking Behavior." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3): 228-237.
  16. Gold, M. K. ed. 2012. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  17. Jankowski, N. W. 2007. "Exploring E-Science: An Introduction." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2): 549-562.
  18. King, D. W. and Tenopir, C. 2001. "Using and Reading Scholarly Literature." Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34: 423-477.
  19. Larkin, C. 2010. "Looking to the Future While Learning from the Past: Information Seeking in the Visual Arts." Art Documentation, 29(1): 49-60.
  20. Larsen, R. L. 2008. On the Threshold of Cyberscholarship. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(1). [online]
  21. Larsen, R. L. 2012. "The Emergence of Cyberscholarship." In Proceedings of the International Symposium Celebrating the 60th Anniversary of the National Assembly Library of Korea, February 21, 2012, Seoul: National Assembly Library.
  22. Pontille, D. and Torny, D. 2010. "The Controversial Policies of Journal Ratings: Evaluating Social Sciences and Humanities." Research Evaluation, 19(5): 347-360.
  23. Rose, T. 2002. "Technology's Impact on the Information-seeking Behavior of Art Historians." Art Documentation, 21(2): 35-42.
  24. Rhee, H. L. 2010. "Unique Qualities of Historians' Information-seeking Behavior in Historical Research." Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1): 1-2.
  25. Savolainen, R. 1993. "The Sense-making Theory: Reviewing the Interests of a User-centered Approach to Information Seeking and Use." Information Processing & Management, 29(1): 13-28.
  26. UNESCO. 1971. UNISIST Study Report on the Feasibility of a World Science Information System. Paris: UNESCO. [online] [cited 2015. 12. 30.]
  27. Van de Sompel, H. et al. 2004. "Rethinking Scholarly Communication." D-Lib Magazine, 10(9). [online] [cited 2015. 12. 30.]
  28. WeftQDA. [online] [cited 2015. 12. 30]
  29. White, H. D. et al. 2009. "Libcitations: A Measure for Comparative Assessment of Book Publications in the Humanities and Social Sciences." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6): 1083-1096.
  30. Wiktionary. 2015. San Francisco, CA: Wikimedia Foundation., s.v. "cyberscholarship". [online] [cited 2015. 12. 30.]