Preconditioning technique for a simultaneous solution to wind-membrane interaction

  • Sun, Fang-jin (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Liaoning Technical University) ;
  • Gu, Ming (State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University)
  • Received : 2015.06.11
  • Accepted : 2016.01.27
  • Published : 2016.03.25


A preconditioning technique is presented for a simultaneous solution to wind-membrane interaction. In the simultaneous equations, a linear elastic model was employed to deal with the fluid-structure data transfer at the interface. A Lagrange multiplier was introduced to impose the specified boundary conditions at the interface and strongly coupled simultaneous equations are derived after space and time discretization. An initial linear elastic model preconditioner and modified one were derived by treating the linearized elastic model equation as a saddle point problem, respectively. Accordingly, initial and modified fluid-structure interaction (FSI) preconditioner for the simultaneous equations were derived based on the initial and modified linear elastic model preconditioners, respectively. Wind-membrane interaction analysis by the proposed preconditioners, for two and three dimensional membranous structures respectively, was performed. Comparison was made between the performance of initial and modified preconditioners by comparing parameters such as iteration numbers, relative residuals and convergence in FSI computation. The results show that the proposed preconditioning technique greatly improves calculation accuracy and efficiency. The priority of the modified FSI preconditioner is verified. The proposed preconditioning technique provides an efficient solution procedure and paves the way for practical application of simultaneous solution for wind-structure interaction computation.


Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China


  1. Badia, S., Quaini, A. and Quarteroni, A. (2008a), "Modular vs. non-modular preconditioners for fluid-structure systems with large added-mass effect", Comput. Method. Appl. M., 197(49-50), 4216-4232.
  2. Badia, S., Quaini, A. and Quarteroni, A. (2008b), "Splitting methods based on algebraic factorization for fluid-structure interaction", SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 30(4), 1778-1805.
  3. Barker, A.T. and Cai, X.C. (2009), "NKS for fully coupled fluid-structure interaction with application", Lecture Notes in Computational Science & Engineering, 70, 275-282.
  4. Barker, A.T. and Cai, X.C. (2010), "Scalable parallel methods for monolithic coupling in fluid-structure interaction with application to blood flow modeling", J. Comput. Phys., 229(3), 642-659.
  5. Borna, A., Habashi, W.G., McClure, G. and Nadarajah, S.K. (2013), "CFD-FSI simulation of vortex-induced vibrations of a circular cylinder with low mass-damping", Wind Struct., 16(5), 411-431.
  6. Dagnew, A.K. and Bitsuamlak, G.T. (2013), "Computational evaluation of wind loads on buildings: a review", Wind Struct., 16(6), 629-660.
  7. Dagnew, A.K. and Bitsuamlak, G.T. (2014), "Computational evaluation of wind loads on a standard tall building using LES", Wind Struct., 18(5), 567-598.
  8. Degroote, J., Bathe, K.J. and Vierendeels, J. (2009), "Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid-structure interaction", Comput. Struct., 87(11-12), 793-801.
  9. Farhat, C. and Vinod, K.L. (2014), "An ALE formulation of embedded boundary methods for tracking boundary layers in turbulent fluid-structure interaction problems", J. Comput. Phys., 263(15), 53-70.
  10. Forster, C., Wall, W.A. and Ramm, E. (2005), "On the geometric conservation law in transient flow calculations on deforming domains", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl., 50(12), 1369-1379.
  11. Geuzaine, C. and Remacle, J.F. (2009), "Gmsh: a three-dimensional finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 79(11), 1309-1331.3366077
  12. Habchi, C., Russeil, S. and Bougeard, D. (2013), "Partitioned solver for strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction", Comput. Fluids, 71(30), 306-319.
  13. Hachem, E., Feghali, S., Codina, R. and Coupez, T. (2013), "Anisotropic adaptive meshing and monolithic Variational Multiscale method for fluid-structure interaction", Comput. Struct., 122, 88-100.
  14. Heil, M., Andrew, L.H. and Jonathan, B. (2008), "Solvers for large-displacement fluid-structure interaction problems: segregated versus monolithic approaches", Comput Mech., 43(1), 91-101.
  15. Hermann, G.M. and Jan, S. (2002), "Partitioned but strongly coupled iteration schemes for nonlinear fluid-structure Interaction", Comput. Struct., 80(27-30), 1991-1999.
  16. Hermann, G.M. and Jan, S. (2003), "Partitioned strong coupling algorithms for fluid-structure interaction", Comput. Struct., 81(8-11), 805-812.
  17. Lazarov, B.S. and Sigmund, O. (2011), "Factorized parallel preconditioner for the saddle point problem", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Biomed. Eng., 27(9), 1398-1410.
  18. Manguoglu, M., Takizawa, K., Ahmed, H.S. and Tezduyar, T.E. (2011), "Nested and parallel sparse algorithms for arterial fluid mechanics computations with boundary layer mesh refinement", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl., 65(1-3), 135-149.
  19. Michler, C., Hulshoff, S.J., Van, E.H. and Borst, (2004), "A monolithic approach to fluid-structure interaction", Comput. Fluids, 33, 839-848.
  20. Namkooong, K., Choi, H. and Yoo, J.Y. (2005), "Computation of dynamic fluid-structure interaction in two-dimensional laminar flows using combined formulation", J. Fluid. Struct., 20(1), 51-69.
  21. Rees, T. and Greif, C. (2007), "A preconditioner for linear systems arising from interior point optimization methods", SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 29(5), 1992-2007.
  22. Saad Y. (2003), "Iterative methods for sparse linear systems", Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.
  23. Sun, F.J. and Gu, M. (2014), "A numerical solution to fluid-structure interaction of membrane structures under wind action", Wind Struct., 19(1), 35-58.