DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Insight into coupled forced vibration method to identify bridge flutter derivatives

  • Xu, Fuyou (School of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology) ;
  • Ying, Xuyong (School of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology) ;
  • Zhang, Zhe (School of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology)
  • Received : 2014.09.10
  • Accepted : 2015.11.12
  • Published : 2016.03.25

Abstract

The flutter derivatives of bridge decks can be efficiently identified using the experimentally and/or numerically coupled forced vibration method. This paper addresses the issue of inherent requirement for adopting different frequencies of three modes in this method. The aerostatic force components and the inertia of force and moment are mathematically proved to exert no influence on identification results if the signal length (t) is integer (n=1,2,3...) times of the least common multiple (T) of three modal periods. It is one important contribution to flutter derivatives identification theory and engineering practice in this study. Therefore, it is unnecessary to worry about the determination accuracy of aerostatic force and inertia of force and moment. The influences of signal length, amplitude, and frequency ratio on flutter derivative are thoroughly investigated using a bridge example. If the signal length t is too short, the extraction results may be completely wrong, and particular attention should be paid to this issue. The signal length t=nT ($n{\geq}5$) is strongly recommended for improving parameter identification accuracy. The proposed viewpoints and conclusions are of great significance for better understanding the essences of flutter derivative identification through coupled forced vibration method.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Science Foundation of China

References

  1. Bartoli, G., Contri, S., Mannini, C. and Righi, M. (2009), "Toward an improvement in the identification of bridge deck flutter derivatives", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 135(8), 771-785. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:8(771)
  2. Chen, Z., Yu, X., Yang, G. and Spencer Jr, B. (2005), "Wind-induced self-excited loads on bridges", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 131(12), 1783-1793. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1783)
  3. Diana, G., Resta, F., Zasso, A., Belloli, M. and Rocchi, D. (2004), "Forced motion and free motion aeroelastic tests on a new concept dynamometric section model of the Messina suspension bridge", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 92(6), 441-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.01.005
  4. Falco, M., Curami, A. and Zasso, A. (1992), "Nonlinear effects in sectional model aeroelastic parameters identification", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 42(1), 1321-1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90140-6
  5. Guo, Z. (2006), Three degree-of-freedom forced vibration method for identification of aerodynamic derivatives of bridge decks, Ph.D. dissertaion, Tongji University, China.
  6. Hua, X. and Chen, Z. (2008), "Full-order and multimode flutter analysis using ANSYS", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 44(9), 537-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2008.01.011
  7. Li, Q. (1995), "Measuring flutter derivatives for bridge sectional models in water channel", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 121(1), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:1(90)
  8. Mannini, C. and Bartoli, G. (2008), "Investigation on the dependence of bridge deck flutter derivatives on steady angle of attack", Proceedings of the BBAAVI Int. Colloquium on Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics and Applications, Milano, Italy.
  9. Mannini, C., Soda, A., VoB, R. and Schewe, G. (2010), "Unsteady RANS simulations of flow around a bridge section", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 98(12), 742-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.010
  10. Matsumoto, M., Matsumiya, H., Fujiwara, S. and Ito, Y. (2010), "New consideration on flutter properties based on step-by-step analysis", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 98(8), 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.02.001
  11. Matsumoto, M., Shiraishi, N., Shirato, H., Shigetaka, K. and Niihara, Y. (1993), "Aerodynamic derivatives of coupled/hybrid flutter of fundamental structural sections", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 49(1), 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90051-O
  12. Niu, H., Chen, Z., Liu, M., Han, Y. and Hua, X. (2007), "Development of the 3-DOF forced vibration device to measure the aerodynamic forces on section models", Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Cairns, Australia.
  13. Noda, M., Utsunomiya, H., Nagao, F., Kanda, M. and Shiraishi, N. (2003), "Effects of oscillation amplitude on aerodynamic derivatives", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 91(1), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00338-0
  14. Scanlan, R.H. (1997), "Amplitude and turbulence effects on bridge flutter derivatives", J. Struct. Eng. -ASCE, 123(2), 232-236. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:2(232)
  15. Shirai, S. and Ueda, T. (2003), "Aerodynamic simulation by CFD on flat box girder of super-long-span suspension bridge", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 91(1), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00351-3
  16. Singh, L., Jones, N., Scanlan, R. and Lorendeaux, O. (1996), "Identification of lateral flutter derivatives of bridge decks", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 60, 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(96)00025-6
  17. Sun, D., Owen, J. and Wright, N. (2009), "Application of the k-${\omega}$ turbulence model for a wind-induced vibration study of 2D bluff bodies", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 97(2), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.08.002
  18. Ukeguchi, N., Sakata, H. and Nishitani, H. (1966), "An investigation of aeroelastic instability of suspension bridges", Proceedings of the Int. Symposium on Suspension Bridges, Lisbon.
  19. Vairo, G. (2003), "A numerical model for wind loads simulation on long-span bridges", Simul. Model. Pract. Th., 11(5), 315-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-190X(03)00053-4
  20. Walther, J.H. and Larsen, A. (1997), "Two dimensional discrete vortex method for application to bluff body aerodynamics", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 67, 183-193.
  21. Xu, F., Chen, X., Cai , C. and Chen, A. (2012), "Determination of 18 flutter derivatives of bridge decks by an improved stochastic search algorithm", J. Struct. Eng. -ASCE, 17(4), 576-588.
  22. Xu, F., Ying, X. and Zhang Z. (2014), "A 3-DOF coupled numerical technique for extracting 18 aerodynamic derivatives of bridge decks", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001009
  23. Yang, Y., Ge, Y. and Xiang, H. (2007), "Investigation on flutter mechanism of long-span bridges with 2d-3DOF method", Wind Struct., 10(5), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2007.10.5.421
  24. Zhou, Z. and Ma, R. (2010), "Numerical simulation study of the Reynolds number effect on two bridge decks based on the deterministic vortex method", Wind Struct., 13(4), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2010.13.4.347

Cited by

  1. Identification of aerodynamic derivatives of bridge decks at high testing wind speed vol.45, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2017-0010