Assessment on the Forest Conservation Value Considering Forest Ecosystem Services - The case of Gapyung-gun -

산림 생태계 서비스를 고려한 산림 보전가치 평가 - 가평군을 대상으로 -

  • Jin, Yihua (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jeong, Seunggyu (Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jeong, Seulgi (Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Dongkun (Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural System Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • 김예화 (서울대학교 협동과정조경학) ;
  • 정승규 (서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 정슬기 (서울대학교 대학원) ;
  • 이동근 (서울대학교 조경지역시스템공학부)
  • Received : 2015.05.27
  • Accepted : 2015.09.16
  • Published : 2015.10.31


As biodiversity and climate change have become main issues in recent times, the role of the forest ecosystem has been more important and forest conservation has been highlighted. The purpose of this study is to estimate forest area with high conservation values in Gapyung-gun by considering forest ecosystem services. The indicators of biodiversity, climate regulation, and water regulation were selected for assessment in this study. To assess biodiversity, habitat structural features and distribution characteristics of species were analyzed. Climate regulation and water regulation were assessed through analysis of carbon absorption volume and water storage. The result showed that, 50.1% of the forests in Gapyung-gun had high conservation values. The results were verified by comparing them with distribution tendencies of other environmental maps, which represent forest ecological values, and showed similar distribution tendencies. The study was conducted on only Gapyung-gun in Korea; however, the methods used in this study could be utilized for assessment of other areas to identify forests with high conservation values.


Supported by : 산림청


  1. 강완모, 김지원, 박찬열, 성주한. 2014. 국내 7대 광역시 산림 연결성 비교 분석, 한국농림기상학회지, 16(2), 93-102. (Kang WM, Kim JW, Park CR, Sung JH. 2014. Comparing Connectivity in Forest Networks of Seven Metropolitan Cities of South Korea, Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 16(2), 93-102.)
  2. 김상균. 2011. 산림환경서비스 지불제 연계를 고려한 산림공익기능평가기법 개발 연구, 산림청. (Kim SG. 2011. A study on the development of the methodology to value the social and environmental benefits of forests, connected with payment scheme for forest ecosystem services, Korean Forest Services.)
  3. 권순덕, 박영규, 김은희. 2008. GIS를 이용한 산림기능구분에 관한 연구-춘양 국유림 산림경영계획구를 대상으로, 한국지리정보학회지, 11(4), 10-21. (Kwon SD, Park YK, Kim EH. 2008. Study on Forest Functions Classification using GISChunyang National Forest Management Planning, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, 11(4), 10-21.)
  4. 권혁수. 2011. 보호지역 계획을 위한 생물다양성 통합평가모형-지리산과 덕유산, 가야산 권역을 대상으로, 박사학위논문, 서울대학교. (Gwon HS. 2011. Integrated Evaluation Model of Biodiversity for Conservation Planning: Focused on Mt. Jiri, Mt. Deokyu and Mt. Gaya regions, Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea.)
  5. 김경민. 2012. 생장모델과 GIS를 이용한 소나무림 탄소저장량 공간 분포 추정및 불확실성 평가 충북 단양지역을 대상으로, 박사학위논문, 서울대학교. (Kim KM. 2012. Spatially explicit estimation and the uncertainty analysis of carbon stocks in pine forest using growth model and GIS, Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea.)
  6. 김종호, 이경학, 박찬우, 서정원, 손영모, 김경하, 윤호중, 박찬열, 이승우, 오정수. 2006. 산림의 공익기능 평가, 한국산림휴양학회지, 10(2), 7-15. (Kim JH, Lee KH, Park CW, Seo JW, Son YM, Kim KH, Youn HJ, Park CR, Lee SW, Oh JS. 2006. Nonmarket valuation of forest resources in Korea, The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, 10(2), 7-15.)
  7. 김지연, 권혁수, 서창완, 김명진. 2014. 전국단위의 포유류 생물다양성우수지역 분석 연구, 환경영향평가학회지, 23(6), 453-465.(Kim JY, Kwon HS, Seo CW, Kim MJ. 2014. A nationwide analysis of mammalian biodiversity hotspots in South Korea, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 23(6), 453-465.)
  8. 박은진, 강규이. 2010. 경기도 도시가로수의 탄소저장량과 연간 이산화탄소 흡수량 산정, 한국환경생태학회지, 24(5), 591-600.(Park EJ, Kang GY. 2010. Estimation of C Storage and Annual CO2 Uptake by Street Trees in Gyeonggi-do, Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 24(5), 591-600.)
  9. 산림청. 2012. 주요 산림수종의 표준 탄소흡수량. (Korea Forest Research Institute. 2012. Carbon Emission Factors and Biomass Allometric Equations by Species in Korea, Korean Forest Service.)
  10. 서창완, 박유리, 최윤수. 2008. 위치자료의 종류에 따른 생물종 분포모형 비교 연구, 지형공간정보, 16(4), 59-64. (Seo CW, Park YR, Choi YS. 2008. Comparison of Species Distribution Models According to Location Data, The Korea Society for Geospatial Information System, 16(4), 59-64.)
  11. 송원경, 김은영, 이동근. 2012. 이질적 경관에서의 연결성 측정: 리뷰 및 적용, 환경영향평가, 21(3), 391-407. (Song WK, Kim EY, Lee DK. 2012. Measuring Connectivity in Heterogenous Landscapes: a Review and Application, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 21(3), 391-407.)
  12. 이도원. 2001. 경관생태학-환경계획과 설계, 관리를 위한 공간 생리, 서울: 서울대학교 출판부. (Lee DW. 2001. Landscape Ecology, Seoul: Seoul National University Press.)
  13. 이동근, 송원경. 2008. 삵의 서식지 적합성 평가를 위한 분석단위 설정 및 보전지역 선정: 충청도 지역을 중심으로, 한국조경학회지, 36(5), 64-72. (Lee DK, Song WK. 2008. A study on the Analytic Unit of Habitat Suitability Assessment and Selection in Conservation Areas for Leopard Cat(Prionailurus bengalensis)-Focus on Chungchenong Province Area, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 36(5), 64-72.)
  14. 이종열, 주효진, 노지영. 2010. 계층분석법(AHP)을 활용한 산림가치 우선순위에 관한 연구, 한국정책연구, 10(3), 301-317.(Lee JY, Ju HJ, Roh JY. 2010. Research on Priority of Forest Values based on AHP, Korean Policy Studies, 10(3), 301-317.)
  15. 정승규. 2014. 수변 코리더 연결성 평가모형(RHSM)-강원도 섬강유역을 사례로, 박사학위논문, 서울대학교. (Jeong SK. 2014. Evaluation Model of Riparian Corridor Connectivity: A case Study of Seom River Basin, Gangwon-do, Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea.)
  16. 조윤숙. 2014. 산림자원 및 산림의 공익기능량 추정을 위한 시스템다이내믹스 모형 개발, 한국시스템 다이내믹스 연구, 15(3), 5-36.(Cho YS. 2014. Development of a System Dynamics Model for Estimating the Volume of Forest Resources and Function of Public Benefit, Korean System Dynamics Review, 15(3), 5-36.)
  17. 최태영, 박종화. 2004. 설악산 국립공원내 산양의 잠재 서식지 적합성 모형: 다기준평가기법과 퍼지집합의 도입을 통하여, 한국조경학회지, 32(4), 28-38. (Choi TY, Park JH. 2004. Korean Groal Potential Habitat Suitability Model at Soraksan National Park Using Fuzzy Set and Multi-Criteria Evaluation, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 32(4), 28-38.)
  18. 한국환경정책.평가연구원. 2004. 생태자연도 활용에 있어 식생보전등급 적용 방안 연구, 환경부. (Korean Environmental Institute. 2004. The Study of Vegetation Conservation Ratings Apply for Ecosystem and Nature Map, Ministry of Environment.)
  19. 환경부. 2013. 국토환경성평가지도 평가항목 및 평가기준. (Ministry of Environment. 2013. Indicators and Standard of Korean Environmental Conservation Value Assessment Map.)
  20. Beazley K, Smandych L, Snaith T, Mackinnon F, Austen-Smith JP, Duinker P. 2005. Biodiversity consideration in conservation system planning: Map-based approach for Nova Scotia, CANADA, Ecological Applications, 15(6), 2192-2208.
  21. Bugalho MN, Dias FS, Brinas B, Cerdeira JO. 2015. Using the high conservation value forest concept and Pareto optimization to identify areas maximizing biodiversity and ecosystem services in cork oak landscape, Agroforestry Systems, doi: 10.1007/s10457-015-9814-x.
  22. Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh EG, Chave J, Terborgh J, Foster RB, Nunez P, Aguilar S, Valencia R, Villa G, Muller-Landau HC, Losos E, Hubbell SP. 2002. Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees, Science, 295(5555), 666-669.
  23. Getis A, Ord JK. 1996. Local spatial statistics: an overview in Longley, P. and Batty, M (eds.), Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment, Cambridge: GeoInformation International, 261-277.
  24. Grassman JLI, Tewes ME, Silvy NJ, Kreetiyutanont K. 2005. Spatial organization and diet of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in north-central Thailand, Journal of Zoology (London), 266, 45-54.
  25. Hanski I. 1999. Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes, Oikos, 87(2), 209-219.
  26. Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge, Ecological Monographs, 75, 3-35.
  27. Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-Neto PR. 2005. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data, Ecological Monographs, 75(4), 435-450.
  28. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities, Nature, 403, 853-858.
  29. Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, Collins S, Dobson A, Duke C, Gold B, Jacobson R, Kingsland S, Kranz R, Mappin M, Martinez ML, Micheli F, Morse J, Pace M, Pascual M, Palumbi S, Reichman OJ, Simons A, Townsed A, Turner M. 2004. Ecology for a crowded planet, Science, 304, 1251-1252.
  30. Philips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions, Ecological modelling, 190, 231-259.
  31. Primack RB. 2003. A primer of conservation biology, Sinauer.
  32. Rayden T. 2008. Assessment, management and monitoring of High Conservation Value Forest(HCVF): A practical guide for forest managers, ProForest, Oxford.
  33. Soule ME. 1986. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity.
  34. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G. 1993. Connectivity is a element of landscape structure, Oikos, 68(3), 571-573.
  35. Thorne JH, Roth N, Boynton R. 2014. The San Joaquin Valley Greenprint State of the Valley.
  36. Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops JMH. 2006. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment, Nature, 441, 629-632.
  37. 村井 宏, 岩崎勇作. 1975. 森林狀態的差異對地表逕流, 滲透以及沖蝕的影響, 陳信雄譯, 國立台灣大學森林學系防砂工程學硏究室.(Murai H, Isamu I. 1975. The impact of surface runoff, infiltration and erosion in different forest status, School of Forestry and Resource Conservation, National Taiwan University.)